Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 👑Chappo Calls (Free)👑

Channel

👑Chappo Calls (Free)👑

@cryptochappo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,453subscribers

-300 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001816805540
TypeChannel
Username@cryptochappo
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptochappo

Growth

9,4539,7539,6037 August 2026 — 9,753 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,753 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,730 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,710 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,678 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,646 subscribers24 August 2026 — 9,611 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,590 subscribers30 August 2026 — 9,535 subscribers2 September 2026 — 9,510 subscribers8 September 2026 — 9,453 subscribers7 August 20268 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 32 days, net -300. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,408–9,798 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 04:429,453-57
2 Sept 2026, 20:339,510-25
30 Aug 2026, 11:039,535-55
27 Aug 2026, 15:349,590-21
24 Aug 2026, 17:189,611-35
20 Aug 2026, 23:389,646-32
17 Aug 2026, 13:149,678-32
14 Aug 2026, 00:589,710-20
10 Aug 2026, 18:019,730-23
7 Aug 2026, 12:479,753no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:399,753first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
40s
Average length
40s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

58 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4374.1%
🔥915.5%
🐳35.17%
🍾23.45%
👍11.72%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 May 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 02:35 UTC490 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026

0x0e1CC2EaEec2aC0957f428cC381D62059fBD08FA Heard good team behind, aping a bag here at 85k https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0xaA20eC261EAf4BBD92bc6d0133D3a7eA694715D4

🍾21

11 Jul 2026, 11:56 UTC753 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

1.1M tapped, told you guys good team behind LFG!

3

9 Jul 2026, 18:45 UTC484 views0 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Added a bag here, got told good team behind, lets see how it cooks since robinhood chain is hot rn 0xa5baC17a919A10Ba0628CDA5BCf273681e1a8D4e https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x9a7013172083F275142CE0CDec6d172EbBE68114

28 Jun 2026, 17:04 UTC538 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Bidding $FREEDOM here, got told good team behind, expecting some x’s from here 82XVWa4pEfPhZfN3a7ANHSy9iPekmMwm934ZUpkFMUSA https://dexscreener.com/solana/HG8pdXXeBcbVFukUB1bVa9FUjfEYtqrwpeVvt9uTzfwx

20 Jun 2026, 10:23 UTC581 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

$BLORG is cooking 🔥 told you good dev behind

2

11 Jun 2026, 18:58 UTC732 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Deleted the post, thought team was credible but they ended up selling Still did a 2x from the call but not worth having this up

6

11 Jun 2026, 11:20 UTC699 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Markets are shit not gambling anything. Good days are ahead. Mean while ape hold relax $SQGROW

3

6 Jun 2026, 12:24 UTC845 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Added a eth bag here on $Blorg Good dev behind this one, pretty high conviction that this will do some x’s Dev wont stop cooking until it hits atleast 500K+ here imo https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x4E0445e49cD806aDCa14206C276259bD66100FA3 0xD5F8DB39f84C55fdDE66a8D7999d6C32C1fe3368

1

11 May 2026, 17:10 UTC≈1,010 views4 reactionsread 29 August 2026

We are still so fucking early! Generational cook loading

4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptochappo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Zin Trades
@CryptoZinTrades · 40,839
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
🎯Lyxe’s Degen🎯
@lyxedegen · 42,319
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
Wulf Calls
@wulfcryptocalls · 28,753
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 9 September 2026
Lyxe’s Journal
@cryptolyxecalls · 55,702
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
MemeCoin Whale Pumps
@MemeCoin_Whale_Pumps · 113,637
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“👑Chappo Calls (Free)👑” (@cryptochappo), 9,453 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptochappo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.