Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Crypto Crores Calls

Channel

Crypto Crores Calls

@cryptocroresofficial

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,592subscribers

-729 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002129658766
TypeChannel
Username@cryptocroresofficial
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptocroresofficial

Growth

8,5929,3218,956.57 August 2026 — 9,321 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,321 subscribers8 August 2026 — 9,315 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,218 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,167 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,108 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,057 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,001 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,962 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,917 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,863 subscribers4 September 2026 — 8,705 subscribers9 September 2026 — 8,592 subscribers7 August 20269 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 33 days, net -729. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,483–9,430 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 13:368,592-113
4 Sept 2026, 11:548,705-158
31 Aug 2026, 15:038,863-54
28 Aug 2026, 21:538,917-45
25 Aug 2026, 12:448,962-39
22 Aug 2026, 21:089,001-56
19 Aug 2026, 19:339,057-51
16 Aug 2026, 21:589,108-59
14 Aug 2026, 00:389,167-51
10 Aug 2026, 18:039,218-97
8 Aug 2026, 00:579,315-6
7 Aug 2026, 13:019,321no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:529,321first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 5 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
58.6%
avg views ÷ 8,592 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,040
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.238%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held23 (5 May 202625 August 2026)
Views total10,070
Reactions total24
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

209 reactions across 17 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6631.6%
🔥4019.1%
146.70%
👏146.70%
💯125.74%
👍115.26%
🤯104.78%
🐳73.35%
🏆62.87%
🗿62.87%
🤩62.87%
😇41.91%
🥰41.91%
31.44%
👀31.44%
🤝31.44%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 209 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
78
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 17 we hold a reading for · 88%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptocroresofficial. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 May 2026 to 25 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC≈4,220 views9 reactions10 Starsread 28 August 2026
Photo

All you need to get rich this bull run: 1. Dexscreener 2. GMGN Bot (https://gmgn.ai/?ref=cryptocrores) 3. TrojanBot (https://t.me/solana_trojanbot?start=r-andewblogger) 4. My telegram: https://t.me/cryptocroresofficial 5. X: https://x.com/crypto_crores Let's print💵

3🔥21👀1🗿1🤩1

13 Aug 2026, 08:13 UTC≈5,850 views15 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

I’ve been accumulating more $UTYA over the past few days, and it’s currently around a $33M market cap. We all saw UTYA pump from $4M to $61M in just a few days. That move brought many retail traders and whales into the $GRAM ecosystem, including me. The easiest way to bring attention and liquidity to a chain is by having a memecoin run into the billions. BONK did it for Solana, and CASHCAT recently did it for the R

4🔥32👏21💯1🤩1😇1

4 Jul 2026, 09:38 UTC≈5,560 views12 reactions4 Starsread 28 August 2026
Photo

3x already on $GRINCH. Pepe Grinch is proving why it’s one of the strongest memes on $GRAM. If you missed $PEPE on Ethereum, don’t ignore GRAM's PEPE. I’m betting this is only the beginning.

🔥721🏆1👏1

24 Jun 2026, 17:16 UTC≈5,590 views7 reactions4 Starsread 28 August 2026
Photo

2x on $GRINCH. The only Pepe on $GRAM, created by Egor Zhgun the same artist behind the Utya and Yoda sticker packs. Strong narrative and still early. Don’t get left behind. Pepe Grinch have all the potential to reach billions.

21👏1💯1🔥1🤯1

20 Jun 2026, 09:08 UTC≈5,170 views11 reactions5 Starsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Got around 100 DMs asking which bot I use to trade $GRAM (prev. $TON) coins. Buying and selling coins on STON. fi and DeDust can be slow, and sometimes traders get MEV’d. We all know speed matters a lot in trading, and if you’re not using a bot, you’ll likely be outperformed by those who are. The bot I use to trade GRAM coins is DTrade. It’s one of the fastest and easiest bots to use, with a clean UI, low fees, and

51🏆1👍1💯1🔥1😇1

15 Jun 2026, 10:59 UTC≈4,680 views13 reactions5 Starsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Aped into $GRINCH sitting at a $208K market cap right now, and here’s why I’m so bullish: Pepe Grinch represents every trader who has ever missed a life changing opportunity. Created by legendary Telegram sticker artist Egor Zhgun, Pepe Grinch is the face of regret, missed opportunities, and selling too early. The coin you almost bought. The trade you exited too soon. The meme you ignored before it exploded. Pe

5🐳2🤯2👀1👍1💯1🔥1

15 Jun 2026, 07:40 UTC≈4,470 views12 reactions4 Starsread 28 August 2026

Got a new play on $TON. I’ll share it soon🚬

4👍3💯1🔥1🗿1🤝1🥰1

27 May 2026, 07:16 UTC≈4,430 views18 reactions4 Starsread 28 August 2026
Photo

4x on $ALTSZN it pumped to a $10M market cap while I was sleeping. While other KOLs are busy scamming and rugging their followers, I’m genuinely trying to give you solid calls in this market. I appreciate everyone who’s been supporting and trusting me from the start. This is just the beginning. More big plays are coming. Love you all for the support.

6🔥4🤝2👍1👏1🗿1🤯1🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @cryptocroresofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Zin Trades
@CryptoZinTrades · 40,839
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
Donkey King / Channel
@donkeykingdoky · 28,109
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 September 2026
Wulf Calls
@wulfcryptocalls · 28,753
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 9 September 2026
🎯Lyxe’s Degen🎯
@lyxedegen · 42,319
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
MemeCoin Whale Pumps
@MemeCoin_Whale_Pumps · 113,637
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 August 2026
Lyxe’s Journal
@cryptolyxecalls · 55,702
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
News Coins
@newscoins · 322,769
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto Crores Calls” (@cryptocroresofficial), 8,592 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptocroresofficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.