Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for LUIS CALLS

Channel

LUIS CALLS

@luis100xcalls

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,544subscribers

+149 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001781816723
TypeChannel
Username@luis100xcalls
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/luis100xcalls

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5,1045,5475,325.57 August 2026 — 5,395 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,395 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,394 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,388 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,379 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,223 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,202 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,153 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,118 subscribers30 August 2026 — 5,115 subscribers2 September 2026 — 5,107 subscribers7 September 2026 — 5,104 subscribers11 September 2026 — 5,545 subscribers14 September 2026 — 5,547 subscribers19 September 2026 — 5,544 subscribers5,5447 August 202619 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 43 days, net +149. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,038–5,613 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 04:195,544-3
14 Sept 2026, 23:005,547+2
11 Sept 2026, 15:365,545+441
7 Sept 2026, 01:175,104-3
2 Sept 2026, 10:435,107-8
30 Aug 2026, 21:155,115-3
27 Aug 2026, 16:235,118-35
24 Aug 2026, 18:575,153-49
20 Aug 2026, 17:435,202-21
17 Aug 2026, 11:555,223-156
13 Aug 2026, 23:565,379-9
10 Aug 2026, 22:215,388-6
7 Aug 2026, 22:575,394-1
7 Aug 2026, 12:325,395no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:215,395first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 2 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

466 reactions across 21 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
19642.1%
🔥11524.7%
👍8017.2%
👏429.01%
😁71.50%
🐳61.29%
💯51.07%
🥰51.07%
👀30.644%
🙏20.429%
🤯20.429%
🎉10.215%
🏆10.215%
🫡10.215%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 466 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 20:42 UTC≈1,000 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Truly believe time is running out to pick up $DOGE-1 at these levels.

8🔥7🐳2

9 Aug 2026, 18:38 UTC510 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Just noticed $DOGE-1 updated their website back to the OG version with the day counter. Doge1lunar.com which was in the bio of the official X mission page before someone banned them Seems like they are ramping up for a big week ahead DpBzjtgGLF7QA9Ug3eUVGbnqa6j3jvYBn1XuQuktvfhm

11🐳4🔥2🏆1

8 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC505 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

11🔥3👍2

28 Jul 2026, 13:34 UTC932 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Smash for your $DOGE-1 bags bros https://x.com/0xluisnft/status/2082097175463333929?s=46

👍1510💯5

28 Jul 2026, 08:20 UTC988 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Sitting at 2M right now 5x from bottom call Much much higher soon I’ve been telling you guys all year this is my biggest conviction bag

👍149🔥5

28 Jul 2026, 08:14 UTC≈4,310 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

There’s only one legitimate $DOGE-1 project Don’t get it twisted/miss out on this opportunity You just witnessed 15 different vamps launch Now watch all that money ape in to the clear main runner when the time comes DpBzjtgGLF7QA9Ug3eUVGbnqa6j3jvYBn1XuQuktvfhm

👍12🔥53🙏2

28 Jul 2026, 07:34 UTC560 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Many $DOGE-1 CAs just launched after announcement of the mission in 49 days like I’ve been telling you guys for over a year now I dont think they know that the 1 year old Doge-1 has the IP rights to the mission Free entry here 400k DpBzjtgGLF7QA9Ug3eUVGbnqa6j3jvYBn1XuQuktvfhm

🔥106👍2

20 Jul 2026, 16:34 UTC≈1,780 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

I’m also starting to accumulate $WAR at these levels again We saw the insane run to ATHs of 50M+ Now $WAR headlines are starting to ramp back up again and it is the talk of the town for all major media outlets Just under an hour ago an Iranian air defense officer just got killed by the USA Tension is only going to grow and compound as time goes on Also normie tokens tend to catch a lot of bids and send out of no

🔥119👏3

19 Jul 2026, 15:08 UTC857 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$DOGE-1 chart has been bottomed for a while now and is starting to catch some bids again This remains one of my biggest conviction plays for this upcoming cycle and there’s only been more and more proof as to why it can be the largest runner we’ve seen since last cycle We saw what happened with $ASTEROID and the catalysts that existed with Elon there and how quickly it exploded to 200M MC We saw what just happened

14🔥7👍4

8 Jul 2026, 19:14 UTC980 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$HOOD bottom officially in The reversal has begun Robinhood chain finally starting to catch massive vol With Robinhood CEO interacting with memes it’s only a matter of time till listings on Robinhood go out and normies are all over the place 0x5f6CD1cb5c90d733F0e1B540044230225A96836D

13👏9🔥6

8 Jul 2026, 17:28 UTC≈1,010 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @mocryptoplaysPhoto

Time for the only Robinhood $HOOD memecoin lead runner to become the next biggest 100M MC+ runner on Robinhood Chain. Waiting on @vladtenev to follow @hoodonrobinhood, it's inevitable. $HOOD has the OG $HOOD team from Solana running this, so expecting big numbers from them. CA: 0x5f6CD1cb5c90d733F0e1B540044230225A96836D Posted on X: https://x.com/MoEthWhale/status/2074714146147541206

13👏9🔥6

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @luis100xcalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

DADDY TATE CTO
@DADDYTATECTO · 48,616
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 29 August 2026
Shmoo’s Calls
@shmooscalls · 37,996
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
GS Memecoins (Public)
@degenwar · 23,749
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 17 September 2026
Wulf Calls
@wulfcryptocalls · 28,554
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 9 September 2026
Crypto Mason
@cryptomasun · 29,280
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 8 September 2026
🎯Lyxe’s Degen🎯
@lyxedegen · 42,080
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
Shmoos Journal ✍️
@shmooscasino · 30,186
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 7 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“LUIS CALLS” (@luis100xcalls), 5,544 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/luis100xcalls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.