Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 晶晶工作室

Channel

晶晶工作室

@CrystalspaTW

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,205subscribers

+85 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001310205063
TypeChannel
Username@CrystalspaTW
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/CrystalspaTW

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@CrystalspaTW/69476 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 01:18 UTC@fyt_spa/569317 Aug 2026, 01:18 UTC1.00under a minute
@CrystalspaTW/69479 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 01:18 UTC@fyt_spa/569377 Aug 2026, 01:18 UTC1.00under a minute
@CrystalspaTW/69484 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 01:18 UTC@fyt_spa/569397 Aug 2026, 01:18 UTC1.00under a minute
@CrystalspaTW/69486 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 01:18 UTC@fyt_spa/569417 Aug 2026, 01:18 UTC1.00under a minute
@CrystalspaTW/69490 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 01:18 UTC@fyt_spa/569457 Aug 2026, 01:18 UTC1.00under a minute
@CrystalspaTW/69492 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 01:18 UTC@fyt_spa/569477 Aug 2026, 01:18 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@fyt_spa7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (7–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 8 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @CrystalspaTW — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

6,1196,2156,1677 August 2026 — 6,120 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,119 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,120 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,128 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,144 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,148 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,155 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,160 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,167 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,175 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,180 subscribers8 September 2026 — 6,181 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,182 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,185 subscribers1 October 2026 — 6,200 subscribers7 October 2026 — 6,197 subscribers13 October 2026 — 6,207 subscribers16 October 2026 — 6,215 subscribers19 October 2026 — 6,212 subscribers22 October 2026 — 6,208 subscribers25 October 2026 — 6,206 subscribers28 October 2026 — 6,209 subscribers31 October 2026 — 6,204 subscribers3 November 2026 — 6,209 subscribers6 November 2026 — 6,205 subscribers6,2057 August 20266 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 91 days, net +85. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,105–6,229 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 16:056,205-4
3 Nov 2026, 13:596,209+5
31 Oct 2026, 10:046,204-5
28 Oct 2026, 01:476,209+3
25 Oct 2026, 07:566,206-2
22 Oct 2026, 15:356,208-4
19 Oct 2026, 12:366,212-3
16 Oct 2026, 19:406,215+8
13 Oct 2026, 20:356,207+10
7 Oct 2026, 22:166,197-3
1 Oct 2026, 05:166,200+15
15 Sept 2026, 22:176,185+3
12 Sept 2026, 08:406,182+1
8 Sept 2026, 01:586,181+1
2 Sept 2026, 20:056,180+5
30 Aug 2026, 23:476,175+8
28 Aug 2026, 07:036,167+7
25 Aug 2026, 03:176,160+5
21 Aug 2026, 23:276,155+7
19 Aug 2026, 02:346,148first reading

Engagement

70 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.36%
avg views ÷ 6,205 subscribers
Avg views / post
84.6
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
28
of 70 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held70 (7 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total2,369
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 16:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈23,800
Videos
≈1,300
Links
≈3,140

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 28 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 06:36 UTC52 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

超級新女 #Koey💕 廣東話溝通 全功能服務型靚女👍 Nuru刺激好玩超過癮😍 背漫遊爽到你唔信😳 皮膚白滑任你摸🤫 多汁多水💦易敏感 不格手順得人👍 多功能服務集於一身😱 手法獨特一絕👍🔥 頂級吹功🎷一試難忘 🚘牌易考 預約TG👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 @spacrystaltw TG無人回覆時可電☎️📞 28148293 /91735368 或直接上來街市街8號成安樓2F TG預約 @crystalspa

6 Nov 2026, 06:36 UTC66 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

菲菲靚女全場最大波,超大G奶,按摩服務又非常好,哥哥們快啲過嚟試吓😍😍😍

6 Nov 2026, 06:36 UTC47 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

💜新女 #菲菲 💜 未系其它場出現過 165cm,E杯真波 全店最大波 靚波好揸手,性格隨和好傾 溫柔好服務,順得人,三路通 🚗車牌易考,配合度極高 按得又玩得洗面奶 nuru夾腸最正 慢慢玩吾會急 小心走火喔😜服務有驚喜😜 《服務有保證》👍🏼 服務有:body nuru🔓㊙️ 預約 @spacrystaltw

6 Nov 2026, 06:36 UTC71 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

堅靚😍幼幼 - #Yumi 超級紅牌 (店內實拍) 😝回頭客超高😝 🌟 20歲卜卜趣,青春胴體慢慢品嚐 🌟 傾計Plan 🌟 極易沉船,小啲定力都唔得 🌟 雙眼識放電,小心觸電喔 🌟 鬼妹仔性格,有求必應 🌟 獨特按摩推油手法,試過必讚好 身材評分: 瘦底長腿真D波😋,玩完波再玩腿,一個鐘未必夠時間 精選客人評語不外乎:「SPA界新星,可遇不可求😍」 預約TG👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 @spacrystaltw TG無人回覆時可電☎️📞 28148293 /91735368 或直接上來街市街8號成安樓2F

5 Nov 2026, 01:24 UTC139 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

超級新女 #Koey💕 廣東話溝通 全功能服務型靚女👍 Nuru刺激好玩超過癮😍 背漫遊爽到你唔信😳 皮膚白滑任你摸🤫 多汁多水💦易敏感 不格手順得人👍 多功能服務集於一身😱 手法獨特一絕👍🔥 頂級吹功🎷一試難忘 🚘牌易考 預約TG👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 @spacrystaltw TG無人回覆時可電☎️📞 28148293 /91735368 或直接上來街市街8號成安樓2F TG預約 @crystalspa

5 Nov 2026, 01:24 UTC141 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

斯文長腿 #Emma 陀地 (自拍相 服務王) 165高,天然大E波, Model身材😁按摩骨技一流😍 天然堅靚樣韓妹feel💕 #斯文氣質OL性感秘書😍 皮膚超級白滑 真波大蘿柚大長腿意態撩人🤤 零防守,聽教聽話😬女友feel爆燈 誘人聲線慾求不滿🥰任舞任玩 大車靈魂車高手🏎️ #Rpp男潮吹技術一級棒 反應強烈敏感🤩好多水💦💦 超級溫柔順得人意👍 隨時有驚喜👄㊙️ TG睇相👉https://t.me/CrystalspaTW TG預約👉 @spacrystaltw

5 Nov 2026, 01:24 UTC134 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

#樂兒 🔥🔥🔥 165Cm 天然大D波,模特兒身型 相頭保證 瘦底大長腿👠幼腰馬甲線🤩 蜜桃臀控 不能錯過👍 熱情主動女車手🏎 輕鬆上車😘 Rpp放風箏🪁 男潮吹高手 大長腿腳交🤤 技術冇得頂👍 調情高手🥰 三路全通點玩都得🤪 識得刺激男人敏感點❤️ 包哥哥爽到震 TG睇相👉https://t.me/CrystalspaTW TG預約👉 @spacrystaltw

5 Nov 2026, 01:24 UTC106 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

高質 #Miki 初下海🤩🤩 美女🤩 😜不加修飾純天然清純 溫柔體貼 声音娇嗲嗲要哥哥呵護💋 態度超好,高挑身材 完美黃金比例身型 白滑天然大D波,瘦底,大長腿索爆鏡 女朋友feel 小鳥依人 超溫柔 完美body😍😍😍😍 長得漂亮又溫柔 五官精緻又自然,性格好 服務也好👍一定唔會讓你失望🥰 銷魂大🚗♻️㊙️ TG睇相👉https://t.me/CrystalspaTW TG預約👉 @spacrystaltw

5 Nov 2026, 01:24 UTC90 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

菲菲靚女全場最大波,超大G奶,按摩服務又非常好,哥哥們快啲過嚟試吓😍😍😍

5 Nov 2026, 01:24 UTC41 viewsread 5 November 2026
Photo

💜新女 #菲菲 💜 未系其它場出現過 165cm,E杯真波 全店最大波 靚波好揸手,性格隨和好傾 溫柔好服務,順得人,三路通 🚗車牌易考,配合度極高 按得又玩得洗面奶 nuru夾腸最正 慢慢玩吾會急 小心走火喔😜服務有驚喜😜 《服務有保證》👍🏼 服務有:body nuru🔓㊙️ 預約 @spacrystaltw

5 Nov 2026, 01:24 UTC88 viewsread 5 November 2026

水晶工作室 5/11 預約水晶工作室 #菲菲 #晴晴 #安琪 #Koey #Miki #樂兒 #Yumi 休息 #Emma 點擊名字👆可直接到達美人广告 本店24小時營業 只收現金⭕️ 謝絕過數❌ TG睇相👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 https://t.me/CrystalspaTW TG預約👉@spacrystaltw 無人回覆時可電☎️📞 28148293/91735368 或直接上來街市街8號成安樓2F

4 Nov 2026, 02:31 UTC70 viewsread 5 November 2026
Photo

高質 #Miki 初下海🤩🤩 美女🤩 😜不加修飾純天然清純 溫柔體貼 声音娇嗲嗲要哥哥呵護💋 態度超好,高挑身材 完美黃金比例身型 白滑天然大D波,瘦底,大長腿索爆鏡 女朋友feel 小鳥依人 超溫柔 完美body😍😍😍😍 長得漂亮又溫柔 五官精緻又自然,性格好 服務也好👍一定唔會讓你失望🥰 銷魂大🚗♻️㊙️ TG睇相👉https://t.me/CrystalspaTW TG預約👉 @spacrystaltw

Showing the 12 most recent of 70 posts we hold for @CrystalspaTW. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“晶晶工作室” (@CrystalspaTW), 6,205 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CrystalspaTW.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.