Если давно не пишут про фантомов, то это не значит, что они куда-то исчезли. Такая статистика появления их новых с2. Только в августе уже 8 новых. Всего около 150-ти узлов, у 60-ти из них есть активные жертвы.
👍5👎1

Channel
@CyberSquattingChannel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,443subscribers
+35 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001505258693 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CyberSquattingChannel |
| Created | Between 1 June 2021 and 31 March 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CyberSquattingChannel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:00 | 2,443 | +4 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 2,439 | +11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:14 | 2,428 | +13 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:55 | 2,415 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:44 | 2,414 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:36 | 2,412 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 2,413 | +2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:58 | 2,411 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 2,410 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:30 | 2,409 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 2,408 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 2,408 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
126 reactions across 17 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 118 | 93.7% | |
| 👎 | 8 | 6.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 126 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Если давно не пишут про фантомов, то это не значит, что они куда-то исчезли. Такая статистика появления их новых с2. Только в августе уже 8 новых. Всего около 150-ти узлов, у 60-ти из них есть активные жертвы.
👍5👎1
плюс fdn4apex.com cloudflare04us.com
Волей случая, ознакомился со статьей Zscaler ThreatLabz о GoGRPC Backdoor. Отслеживать таких одно удовольствие 😊 Плюс к индикаторам: 104.194.214.25 104.194.214.58 104.200.67.77 104.200.67.87 104.238.35.192 130.49.214.20 185.228.83.164 185.243.113.90 185.45.192.153 193.29.57.37 193.93.194.67 195.133.38.33 2.58.15.23 2.58.15.231 31.172.83.224 45.86.162.223 45.86.162.228 45.86.162.238 46.30.191.126 46.30.191.60 5.252.…
👍5
Пятничное 😊 Если чтение новостей вводит вас в ступор, то знайте как помочь себе или другому: Начните дышать. Сделайте глубокий вдох и долгий выдох. Следите, чтобы выдох был длиннее вдоха. Включите тело. Осторожно потрогайте руки или плечи человека. Попросите его почувствовать стопами пол. Дайте простые задачи. Попросите назвать три предмета вокруг или сосчитать до десяти. Говорите спокойно. Используйте тихий, ровны…
👍10
На maltrail еще есть индикаторы по этой теме, но не все, конечно. Их там почему-то клаудатласу приписали. На ThreatCat Public Feeds они тоже были. Вообще эта история достаточно активна, с апреля они минимум два десятка узлов сменили и кучу доменов зарегистрировали.
👍3👎1
NetSupport Rat домены, в публичном пространстве еще не светились msedgewebview2.pro cloud365web.com outlook87web.com web365office.com microsoft04web.com microsoft11office.com sheberas.net typoank.net semylox.net copilot6web.com ospanilaryl01.com main-route.com web404router.com web02message.com router-apex.com verify-cloud.digital accountshemig.com
👍3
плюс вчера - mkxaqbzdxvr.top
👍3
Дал почитать роботу статью, через 10 минут говорит надо добавить индикаторов. Не поленился проверить, пара десятков имен в публичном пространстве не светилось. Хотя корейцы, конечно, не сложные для отслеживания ребята, но все-таки роботы (агенты) моего сынишки это тема... Они внимательны, они учатся, не отвлекаются от работы, ничего не забывают... Скоро оставят меня без работы 😀 02euweb.us 02room.us 02usweb.sbs 02w…
Как-то я уже касался этой темы, но можно и еще раз пройтись. Отслеживание инфраструктур злоумышленников, кроме непосредственно индикаторов, дает и еще один пласт информации, а именно их целеполагание. Характерный пример от rare werewolf: aero-bas.store vaz-impulse.site focon.site oao-pit-energo-mash.site tytan-barikada.space oao-electropribor.space info-salut.space вполне читаемая история. В июле они зарегали еще …
👍14
Пару слов о киберпартизанах. Хоть в публичном пространстве о них особо и не слышно, но они явно активны, регулярно регистрируют новые домены. Стабильно 3-4 домена в месяц. Сейчас около 50 активных. Домены используются в своеобразной схеме туннелирования. Приблизительно половина доменов регистрируются по DGA списку коллег из RED Security, остальные уже не DGA. Ниже активные DGA домены, и ссылка на полный список колл…
👍10
Свеженький darkwatchman - 30b2c4e3.xyz
👍7👎3
Вчера вендоры отчитались по атаке через обновление VipNet, ну и я добавлю от себя еще один живой с2 - 5.39.253.210 https://t.me/ptescalator/758 https://securelist.ru/tr/hellonet-vipnet/116327/
👍13
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CyberSquattingChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CyberSquatting RU Alerts” (@CyberSquattingChannel), 2,443 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CyberSquattingChannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.