23 measurements spanning 24 days, net -2,650. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 78,188–81,633 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
31 Aug 2026, 17:36
78,585
-96
30 Aug 2026, 19:55
78,681
-136
29 Aug 2026, 16:54
78,817
-105
28 Aug 2026, 14:16
78,922
-148
27 Aug 2026, 13:11
79,070
-50
26 Aug 2026, 10:28
79,120
-111
25 Aug 2026, 13:35
79,231
-115
24 Aug 2026, 14:29
79,346
-226
22 Aug 2026, 22:29
79,572
-160
21 Aug 2026, 12:04
79,732
-95
20 Aug 2026, 09:22
79,827
-248
19 Aug 2026, 12:28
80,075
-127
18 Aug 2026, 12:04
80,202
-112
17 Aug 2026, 09:34
80,314
-139
15 Aug 2026, 20:17
80,453
-109
14 Aug 2026, 12:57
80,562
-105
13 Aug 2026, 04:03
80,667
-81
12 Aug 2026, 05:31
80,748
-127
11 Aug 2026, 06:01
80,875
-123
10 Aug 2026, 07:00
80,998
first reading
Engagement
65 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.61%
avg views ÷ 78,585 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,260
65 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.194%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
65
of 65 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 38 of 65 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held
65 (3 August 2026 – 26 August 2026)
Views total
82,120
Reactions total
94
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
1 Sept 2026, 02:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈17,800
Videos
≈337
Links
≈9,660
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
94 reactions across 34 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
50
53.2%
😁
22
23.4%
🤣
10
10.6%
🔥
5
5.32%
😢
3
3.19%
👏
2
2.13%
😎
2
2.13%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😁 Thành quả nho nhỏ của một vài ae làm Affiliate Vàng với mình , tiền tươi về mỗi ngày vài trăm tới vài triệu VNĐ củng ấm áp giữa lúc kinh tế khó khăn này
‼️ Đoạn này thị trường Crypto khó kiếm tiền quá , rủi ro khi trade hoặc đăng bài tuyển kèo Airdrop có kèm link mời củng có thể dính liếu đến 1 số quy định pháp lý , KOL lớn nhỏ đã rời bỏ thị trường để tìm con đường khác kiếm ăn rất đông
- Trong khi đó thị trường …
🚫 Bồi thẩm đoàn liên bang tại Las Vegas ngày 24/8 đã kết tội Brent C. Kovar, chủ công ty Profit Connect, về hành vi lừa đảo nhà đầu tư. Kovar bị xác định moi 24 triệu USD từ ít nhất 400 nhà đầu tư.
🔽 Bản chất thì công ty này là một Ponzi cổ điển: lấy tiền người vào sau trả cho người trước, che giấu bằng câu chuyện công nghệ AI đào coin trông có vẻ rất thần thánh!
👉 Và kết quả nhãn tiền là với 15 tội danh, Kovar đan…
🟠 Giới thiệu thị trường Trade Vàng ( Xu Hướng của thế giới hiện tại ) Là Thị trường tài chính lớn nhất thế giới , tồn tại lâu đời hơn 50 năm
— Không đòi hỏi vốn nhiều , Vài chục đô là có thể vào giao dịch được
— Có cả cặp BTC - ETH , nhìu loại tiền tệ quốc gia , xăng dầu ... cho ae Trade
— Vàng đang là xu hướng lớn nhất nhì hiện tại
— TRUMP còn làm tổng thống thì Vàng còn rất nóng
🔖 Đặc Biệt Vàng chưa có luật áp th…
😁 Bitcoin tăng lên vị trí thứ 12
Tháng này chứng kiến sự tăng trưởng của hầu hết các lĩnh vực. Vàng, bạc và các công ty công nghệ lớn đều tăng hàng nghìn tỷ, nhưng Bitcoin dẫn đầu với mức tăng 24,8%, trở lại vị trí thứ 12 với giá 80.000 đô la.
😁 Vốn hóa thị trường crypto đã tăng 22% chỉ trong 7 ngày, thêm 474 tỷ USD giá trị.
Đây là mức tăng tuần lớn nhất mà thị trường crypto ghi nhận kể từ tháng 2/2021, tức phá kỷ lục hơn 5 năm qua.
🔼 Và nếu nhìn vào hiện tại thì cú tăng này diễn ra ngay giữa bối cảnh thị trường ảm đạm, không phải trong một chu kỳ háo hức tăng giá điển hình.
🟠 Cập nhật giá Vàng Bạc thế giới và trong nước hôm nay | Thứ 2 Ngày 24-8-2026
- Giá vàng miếng SJC hôm nay bán ra: 14.900.000đ/chỉ.
- Giá vàng Tư nhân 24K 9999:
- Tại một số nơi bán ra khoảng: 14.450.000đ/chỉ.
- Giá vàng thế giới hiện nay khoảng 4.629 USD/ounce. Quy đổi sang Việt nam đồng khoảng 14.680.000đ/chỉ.
⚪️ Giá bạc Phú Quý khoãng 2.390.000 triệu đồng /lượng . khoảng 63,7 triệu đồng/Kg.
- Giá bạc thế giới sá…
🇺🇸 DÒNG TIỀN VÀO/RA TỪ CÁC QUỸ ETF: Tuần trước
🔼 Các quỹ ETF giao dịch trực tiếp tiền điện tử đã chứng kiến dòng tiền ròng tăng đáng kể
😁 Trong đó BTC dẫn đầu với 1,92 tỷ đô la và ETH đạt 697,18 triệu đô la.
- BTC: 1,92 tỷ đô la
- ETH: 697,18 triệu đô la
- XRP: 39,78 triệu đô la
- SOL: 28,34 triệu đô la
- LINK: 13,35 triệu đô la
- HYPE: 3,89 triệu đô la
- AVAX: 1,30 triệu đô la
- HBAR: 848.19 nghìn đô la
- DOGE: 6…
🟠 Vàng vượt mốc 4700$
🔼 Đà tăng còn được hỗ trợ bởi đồng USD suy yếu và những tín hiệu cho thấy lợi suất trái phiếu cao có thể phản ánh áp lực kinh tế tiềm ẩn.
Thị trường hiện tập trung vào PCE tháng 7 và bài phát biểu của Kevin Warsh tại Jackson Hole.
🤔 Nếu Fed giữ giọng điệu thận trọng và để ngỏ khả năng nới lỏng, vàng có thể tiếp tục hưởng lợi.
➕ Tham Khảo Thị Trường Vàng
https://t.me/DTLChannels/22053
⏰ TUẦN NÀY CÓ NHỮNG SỰ KIỆN ĐÁNG CHÚ Ý
THỨ HAI → DỮ LIỆU LẠM PHÁT BOJ
THỨ BA → THÔNG BÁO KHẨN CẤP FOMC
THỨ TƯ → FED BƠM $2.1 TỶ
THỨ NĂM → DIỄN ĐÀN KINH TẾ MỸ
THỨ SÁU → BÀI PHÁT BIỂU CỦA CHỦ TỊCH FED KEVIN WARSH
🕯 Chỉ số tham lam và sợ hãi của thị trường 24/8 ... Ae đang fomo quá nhỉ 😁
Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @DTLChannels. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 317,217 of 1,629,362 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Dân Cày Airdrop 💎💙 @dancayairdrop · 68,184 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 August 2026
Thông báo Baby Doge @BabyDogeAnnVI · 87,048 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 17 August 2026
OpenPad AI Channel @openpad_channel · 168,374 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 16 August 2026
ONUS Announcements @onus_newsroom · 216,367 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DTL Channels 🇻🇳” (@DTLChannels), 78,585 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DTLChannels.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.