Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far below this size band
124 average views per post against 335,207 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.037%. Across the 1,201 registered channels in the same cohort — 316,370–998,379 subscribers — the middle half sit between 1.58% and 11.4%, with a median of 3.98%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (7 August 2026 – 6 September 2026)
Posts measured
886 of 886 published in the window (886 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
110,088
Mature posts only
0.057% over 16 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 6 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
54 measurements spanning 28 days, net -17,355. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 332,604–355,165 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 54
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Sept 2026, 16:21
335,207
-164
5 Sept 2026, 09:37
335,371
-1,006
3 Sept 2026, 19:38
336,377
-215
3 Sept 2026, 10:13
336,592
-723
2 Sept 2026, 11:12
337,315
no change
2 Sept 2026, 07:17
337,315
-691
1 Sept 2026, 10:12
338,006
no change
1 Sept 2026, 08:07
338,006
-537
31 Aug 2026, 11:57
338,543
-17
31 Aug 2026, 08:34
338,560
-576
30 Aug 2026, 14:27
339,136
-137
30 Aug 2026, 10:07
339,273
-416
29 Aug 2026, 13:16
339,689
-65
29 Aug 2026, 12:06
339,754
-446
28 Aug 2026, 15:53
340,200
-61
28 Aug 2026, 14:44
340,261
-590
27 Aug 2026, 15:46
340,851
no change
27 Aug 2026, 15:44
340,851
-433
26 Aug 2026, 14:43
341,284
no change
26 Aug 2026, 14:16
341,284
first reading
Engagement
886 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.037%
avg views ÷ 335,207 subscribers
Avg views / post
124
886 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.676%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
886
of 886 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 77 of 886 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026
Posts held
886 (7 August 2026 – 6 September 2026)
Views total
110,088
Reactions total
85
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Sept 2026, 13:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈6,710
Videos
≈2,310
Links
≈706
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3m 00s
Average length
15s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
85 reactions across 70 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
70
82.4%
👍
4
4.71%
👎
3
3.53%
🔥
2
2.35%
🤣
2
2.35%
👏
1
1.18%
💩
1
1.18%
😱
1
1.18%
🤮
1
1.18%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 77 of the 886 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 85 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 886 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔓 جیلبریک هوش مصنوعی، ارزانتر از یک فنجان قهوه
سایت Abliteration.ai نسخههای بدون محدودیت از مدلهای متنباز مثل GLM-5.3 را میفروشد؛ مدلهایی که تمام فیلترهای ایمنیشان کاملاً حذف شده. این سرویس رسماً برای «تیمهای قرمز» (red teaming) و آزمونهای امنیتی بازاریابی میشود، اما خبرنگاران در عرض چند دقیقه توانستند دستورالعمل ساخت بدافزار دریافت کنند.
مدلهای متنباز همیشه یک شمشیر دولبه بودند 🔓 — حالا کسی آن لبهٔ تیز…
🛢️ اوپکپلاس سهمیههای تولید را تا پایان سال ثابت نگه داشت
با وجود اختلال در عرضهٔ نفت خاورمیانه به دنبال جنگ ایران، OPEC+ تصمیم گرفت سهمیههای تولید خود را تا پایان سال بدون تغییر حفظ کند. 🌍
@baxcryptonews
💰 رکورد تاریخی میلیونرهای ۴۰۱K در آمریکا
شمار افرادی که از طریق حسابهای بازنشستگی ۴۰۱K به میلیونر تبدیل شدهاند، به رکورد تاریخی ۷۶۹,۰۰۰ نفر رسید.
@baxcryptonews
⭕️ بوکله دروغ رسانهها را رد کرد؛ ذخایر BITCOIN السالوادور در دست دولت است 🇸🇻
رئیسجمهور السالوادور، نایب بوکله، ادعاهای رسانهای درباره واگذاری ذخایر استراتژیک BITCOIN این کشور به یک اپراتور خصوصی را «کاملاً دروغ» خواند. وی تأکید کرد تنها سهام CHIVO WALLET منتقل شده، نه BTC متعلق به دولت که اکنون بیش از ۷٬۷۶۶ واحد است.
🔸 نکات کلیدی:
• 📰 روزنامه اسپانیایی El País به استناد بیانیه IMF مدعی انتقال کنترل بیش از ۶۳۲ می…
⭕️ نهنگ دوران SATOSHI بیدار شد؛ ۶۰۰ BTC از سال ۲۰۱۰ جابجا شد 🐋
یک ماینر قدیمی از دوران SATOSHI، روز شنبه ۶۰۰ BTC به ارزش تقریباً ۴۷.۸۴ میلیون دلار را پس از بیش از ۱۵ سال سکون جابجا کرد. این انتقال در بلاکهای ۹۶۵۶۳۹ تا ۹۶۵۶۴۶ و از طریق ۱۲ کیفپول قدیمی P2PK به کیفپولهای جدید P2WPKH انجام شد.
🔸 نکات کلیدی:
• 📅 این ۶۰۰ BTC بین ۲ تا ۵ مارس ۲۰۱۰ ماین شدهاند؛ پیش از آنکه BITCOIN اصلاً قیمت بازاری داشته باشد
• 🏦 ARKHA…
⭕️ بحران بزرگ کریپتو در شیلی؛ ORIONX تعلیق شد 🚨
صرافی شیلیایی ORIONX پس از کشف یک حفره مالی ۷ میلیون دلاری، برداشت کاربران را متوقف کرده و در حال تعطیلی است. حسابرسی قانونی نشان داد داراییهای امانی کاربران به کیفپولهای خارجی منتقل شده؛ صرافی علیه دو بنیانگذارش شکایت کیفری ثبت کرد.
🔸 نکات کلیدی:
• بیش از ۱۰۰,۰۰۰ کاربر در معرض خطر از دست دادن داراییهایشان هستند
• 📉 تراکنشهای مشکوک بین ۲۰۱۸ تا ۲۰۲۱ انجام شده؛ وج…
🔑 اولویت BNB CHAIN تغییر کرد
مدیر اجرایی رشد BNB CHAIN اعلام کرد که کاهش کارمزدهای شبکه دیگر در صدرِ اولویتها قرار ندارد — بهجای آن، تمرکز اصلی بر توسعهٔ مدلهای تجاریِ پایدار است. 📈
@baxcryptonews
⭕️ مصادرهٔ ۵۶۰ هزار دلار کریپتو از شبکهٔ تأمین مالی HAMAS توسط FBI 🚨
FBI در یک عملیات چندمرحلهای، بیش از ۵۶۰ هزار دلار رمزارز مقصد HAMAS را مصادره کرد. این عملیات شامل تصاحب دامنهها، سرورها و یک گروه رمزنگاریشده برای جذب کمکمالی بود. همچنین اطلاعات هزاران حامی بالقوه در سراسر جهان به دست آمد.
🔸 نکات کلیدی:
• سه مرحلهٔ مصادره در ۲۵ مارس، ۲۵ ژوئن و ۱۰ اکتبر ۲۰۲۵ انجام شد
• 📈 شبکهٔ کریپتوی هدف از اکتبر ۲۰۲۴ بیش از…
⭕️ شکست پارلمان لهستان در لغو وتوی قانون کریپتو 🇵🇱
پارلمان لهستان برای سومین بار موفق نشد وتوی رئیسجمهور بر قانون بازار داراییهای دیجیتال را نقض کند. رأیگیری روز جمعه تنها ۲۴۱ رأی از ۲۶۶ رأی موردنیاز را به دست آورد. این ناکامی در حالی رخ داد که لهستان درگیر رسوایی صرافی ZONDACRYPTO است.
🔸 نکات کلیدی:
• 📉 سومین شکست پارلمان در لغو وتوی رئیسجمهور NAWROCKI بر قانون کریپتو
• 🏦 شرکتهای کریپتوی لهستانی مجبورند برای …
🇰🇷 رونق تراشه، صادرات کره جنوبی را متحول کرد
موج بوم CHIPS جهانی، صادرات کره جنوبی را بهشدت تقویت کرده و این کشور را به یکی از بزرگترین بهرهبرداران از رشد تقاضای تراشه در سطح جهان تبدیل کرده است. 📈
@baxcryptonews
🔥 رابینهود از سولانا پیشی گرفت
ROBINHOOD در حجم معاملات ۲۴ ساعته صرافیهای غیرمتمرکز (DEX) از SOL پیشی گرفت — رقمی که توجه بازار را به خود جلب کرده است.
@baxcryptonews
📉 دلار آمریکا ۹۷٪ از قدرت خرید خود را از دست داده است
از زمان تأسیس FEDERAL RESERVE تاکنون، دلار آمریکا ۹۷٪ از ارزش واقعی خود را از دست داده است 💸 کالایی که در سال ۱۹۱۳ تنها ۳ دلار قیمت داشت، امروز ۱۰۰ دلار هزینه میبرد.
@baxcryptonews
👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 886 posts we hold for @cactusbox. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
CANO Kombat News @canoann · 32,843 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 4 September 2026
Gold Miner @GoldMiner_App · 92,423 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
PHI Network @PHICoreTeam · 41,563 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 August 2026
Meme Rich Club @meme_investerment_community · 139,835 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 28 August 2026
Crypto Novel 🪙 @CryptoBtcNovel · 122,433 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 August 2026
QCT @QCT_News · 53,868 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 August 2026
Airdrop coinfree @irdropcrypto · 35,485 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 2 September 2026
PinEye Community @pineye · 1,150,322 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 August 2026
Duck @duckcoin · 144,260 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026
Galaxy Wallet @bscgalaxywallet · 233,701 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 28 August 2026
Galaxy Announcements @bscnewwallet · 218,478 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
OpenPad AI Channel @openpad_channel · 166,529 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 16 August 2026
DTL Channels 🇻🇳 @DTLChannels · 78,158 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 August 2026
Allinvex Crypto Exchange @Allinvexc · 147,464 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
ONUS Announcements @onus_newsroom · 215,092 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
1000DaysCrypto | Channel @days1000crypto · 35,095 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 2 September 2026
ارز دیجیتال سیگنال رایگان @coinxj · 36,794 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 1 September 2026
EARTH @earthcoin_channel · 179,852 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
Đồng Đội CRYPTO - Channel @dongdoicrypto · 35,108 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
MAHAN Crypto💵🐦🔥🐦🔥 @cryptomahanbit · 48,410 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 25 August 2026
Dân Cày Airdrop 💎💙 @dancayairdrop · 67,589 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 August 2026
Number++ @numb3rdp · 35,114 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 2 September 2026
Thông báo Baby Doge @BabyDogeAnnVI · 85,943 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 17 August 2026
MeonCoin Channel🐱 @MeonCoin · 125,039 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 25 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BaxCrypto” (@cactusbox), 335,207 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cactusbox.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.