Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
22 measurements spanning 88 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,749–1,769 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Nov 2026, 23:29
1,760
+1
31 Oct 2026, 17:26
1,759
+3
28 Oct 2026, 15:55
1,756
+5
25 Oct 2026, 12:55
1,751
-7
19 Oct 2026, 09:21
1,758
+2
12 Oct 2026, 22:28
1,756
-1
6 Oct 2026, 16:19
1,757
-8
29 Sept 2026, 08:36
1,765
+6
19 Sept 2026, 04:35
1,759
+6
14 Sept 2026, 18:20
1,753
-1
11 Sept 2026, 07:21
1,754
-10
6 Sept 2026, 09:37
1,764
+3
2 Sept 2026, 02:35
1,761
-2
30 Aug 2026, 04:27
1,763
+3
27 Aug 2026, 07:43
1,760
-1
20 Aug 2026, 21:56
1,761
-4
17 Aug 2026, 13:03
1,765
-1
14 Aug 2026, 14:56
1,766
-1
11 Aug 2026, 00:43
1,767
+2
8 Aug 2026, 09:46
1,765
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 1 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
242 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
142
58.7%
🔥
80
33.1%
💔
16
6.61%
🥰
3
1.24%
👍
1
0.413%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 242 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 1 March 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сегодня был у психиатра, чтобы решить, что делать с таблетками, потому что кажется словил выгорание и ухудшение по симптомам депрессии, которую мы лечим с мая 2025 года. Сейчас мне получше, не зря (можно сказать вынужденно) пошел в отпуск!
И вот что было очень интересным. Депрессия существует не сама по себе - это следствие сильного истощения на фоне не только СДВГ, но и РАС. Да, мы давно крутили гипотезу насчет РАС…
Думаю, пора переписать пост-знакомство.
Меня зовут Дамир. Как вы уже знаете, я врач-психиатр и психотерапевт.
Сначала хочу сказать спасибо. Какое-то время этот канал был во многом про путь к себе, для более широкой аудитории. Многие из вас были со мной всё это время - читали, делились реакциями, своими историями. Я правда это ценю.
🔺И поэтому хочу быть честным: я понял, что мне хочется двигаться чуть-чуть в другую…
Хочу вернуться в детство и сказать себе: ты важен, я тебя вижу и ценю просто за то, что ты есть, успехи и достижения не определяют твою ценность.
А что бы вы хотели передать маленькой версии себя ? Пишите в комментариях, буду очень рад, если поделитесь
Часто в моей памяти всплывают воспоминания о периоде, когда я не справлялся. Тогда-то психиатр и поставил мне ПРЛ.
Не буду делать вид, что всегда знал как жить правильно. Был период, когда рассыпалось то, что казалось надёжным, отношения рушились и было очень тяжело.
Я пытался делать всё "правильно" и всё равно оказывался в одном и том же месте, c теми же реакциями, эмоциями и болью.
И (как-то кажется случайно) т…
Снова вопрос к коллегам. Если вы психолог, психотерапевт или психиатр. Сколько вы в ДЕНЬ можете консультировать человек, чтоб после рабочего дня у вас были силы? Хочу узнать, как у кого это у устроено
2-3 человека48%
4-540%
6-74%
8-101%
Больше 102%
Свой вариант15%
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
И вот первый член нашей mental health team, которого я хочу вам представить – это чудесный человек, Борис. И вот что он пишет про себя.
«🙌 Здравствуйте!
Меня зовут Борис, я клинический психолог. Работаю в таких научно-обоснованных подходах, как терапия принятия и ответственности (ACT) и функциональная аналитическая психотерапия (FAP). Провожу консультации в Санкт-Петербурге и онлайн.
➡️ Строго следую этическому код…
Больше года я вынашивал одну идею.
Найти людей, которые со мной на одной волне. Которые реально разбираются в психотерапии — и при этом человечны, гуманны, в общем имеют схожие ценности. Готовы работать в команде, а не каждый сам по себе.
Идея простая: команда специалистов, которая помогает сообществу людей.
Более 30 заявок на работу в команде и 30 проведенных созвонов и собеседований.
Почему только сейчас готов н…
Сделал карточки для облегчения восприятия
Кому так легче/удобнее читать, ставьте огоньки, чтоб я понимал, на какой формат сделать упор 🔥
#СДВГ
🔥23❤11🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @Damir_lets_study. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Снова вопрос к коллегам. Если вы психолог, психотерапевт или психиатр. Сколько вы в ДЕНЬ можете консультировать человек, чтоб после рабочего дня у вас были силы? Хочу узнать, как у кого это у устроено
2-3 человека48%
4-540%
6-74%
8-101%
Больше 102%
Свой вариант15%
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 1 March 2026 to 23 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Damir_lets_study named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@yulia_grek named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Краснощеков | Детская психиатрия @doc_kras · 19,309 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 4 October 2026
Где моё внимание? @pure_cognitions_adhd · 28,372 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 September 2026
Доктор Лесков @doctorleskov · 27,769 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 September 2026
Чистые Когниции @pure_cognitions · 38,832 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дамир Про Терапию 🧠” (@Damir_lets_study), 1,760 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Damir_lets_study.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.