3+ odds on steezybet๐ฅ๐ฐ Code: SRGZWL Register here; https://steezybet.com/auth/register?affiliate_id=DearGod Use promo code ; DEARGOD
โค28๐ค6

Channel
@DearGodwins
On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry
24,832subscribers
+10,159 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002007672576 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DearGodwins |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DearGodwins |
Gambling & betting โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 12:01 | 24,832 | +1 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 00:59 | 24,831 | +22 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:20 | 24,809 | +111 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:41 | 24,698 | -33 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 13:01 | 24,731 | -6 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:37 | 24,737 | +65 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 14:20 | 24,672 | +121 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:35 | 24,551 | +767 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:33 | 23,784 | +273 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:44 | 23,511 | +291 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:56 | 23,220 | +525 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:15 | 22,695 | +670 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 22,025 | +607 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:13 | 21,418 | +436 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 20,982 | +610 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 20,372 | +1,305 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:14 | 19,067 | +1,800 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 17,267 | +1,526 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:13 | 15,741 | +564 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 15,177 | first reading |
436 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 436 (10 August 2026 โ 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,295,480 |
| Reactions total | 31,739 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 11:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
41,128 reactions across 416 posts, in 49 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 17,050 | 41.5% | |
| ๐ฅ | 13,401 | 32.6% | |
| ๐ | 2,721 | 6.62% | |
| ๐ | 2,485 | 6.04% | |
| ๐ | 1,136 | 2.76% | |
| ๐ | 1,066 | 2.59% | |
| ๐ข | 713 | 1.73% | |
| ๐ | 397 | 0.965% | |
| ๐ | 340 | 0.827% | |
| ๐ | 275 | 0.669% | |
| ๐พ | 267 | 0.649% | |
| ๐คฏ | 221 | 0.537% | |
| ๐ | 194 | 0.472% | |
| โก | 154 | 0.374% | |
| ๐ฏ | 107 | 0.26% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 80 | 0.195% | |
| ๐ค | 63 | 0.153% | |
| ๐ฑ | 60 | 0.146% | |
| ๐ซก | 55 | 0.134% | |
| ๐ | 31 | 0.075% | |
| 29 further kinds | 312 | 0.759% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 418 of the 436 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 41,128 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 436 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ bought with money โ on a post by @DearGodwins. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 436 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
3+ odds on steezybet๐ฅ๐ฐ Code: SRGZWL Register here; https://steezybet.com/auth/register?affiliate_id=DearGod Use promo code ; DEARGOD
โค28๐ค6
8F78QJ
โค92๐22๐ฅ21
130+ odds for the day๐
โค125๐25๐ฅ18
Take it as if you are giving away this money, just take part in this, even when we fail, still go again, youโll be making your first 100,000ghc with this if you havenโt yet. Just have the patience and donโt give upโค๏ธ๐
โค246๐ฅ66๐50๐10๐7๐7๐5๐พ4
BW6E4B5258
๐ฅ104โค29๐11๐ฅฐ7๐3
Rollover Week 1 ๐ 200ghc >>>> 1000ghc Too sweeeettt๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅ
๐ฅ167โค42๐24๐5๐1
5 odds Weekly rollover 1 month ( 125k GHC) Week 1 ๐ 200 x 5 =1,000 GHC Week 2 ๐ 1000 x 5 =5,000 GHC Week 3 ๐ 5000 x 5 =25,000 GHC Week 4 ๐ 25000 x 5 =125,000 GHC You are getting your car money in a month with 200ghc! Take this serious, pray for me and letโs hope for the best ๐๐๐๐
โค409๐ฅ136๐107๐26๐12๐จโ๐ป8๐ฏ7๐5
Those who have problem with the previous code can use this; BW6E4961B4
โค104๐ฅ23๐10๐3๐คฏ2
Just know we are only doing this for 4 days as usual
๐178๐ฅ43โค21๐7๐5๐4๐พ3๐3
BW6E488FD8
๐135โค54๐ฅ36๐7๐4๐2
Rollover Day 2๐๐ 400ghc >>>> 1600ghc โ Too sweet๐๐ฅ
โค193๐ฅ74๐11๐8๐ค5๐4๐4๐คฏ4
Rollover Day 1 BOOOOMMMโ โ โ ๐๐๐๐ 400ghc in the bagggg.. weโve started well๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅ
๐ฅ350โค98๐33๐11๐10๐คฏ6๐5๐4
Showing the 12 most recent of 436 posts we hold for @DearGodwins. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions โ Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Telegramโs own answer, not this registerโs. When this register asks Telegramโs API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it โ never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegramโs; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegramโs recommendation API, most recently 15 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register โ how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โDEAR GOD WINS๐โ (@DearGodwins), 24,832 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DearGodwins.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.