Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for KELVIN BET CHANNEL

Channel

KELVIN BET CHANNEL

@Pymstake0

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,656subscribers

+23 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001545842267
TypeChannel
Username@Pymstake0
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded20 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Pymstake0

Growth

13,62913,69613,662.520 August 2026 — 13,633 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,633 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,639 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,660 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,673 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,629 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,669 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,682 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,678 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,688 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,696 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,693 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,685 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,674 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,656 subscribers13,65620 August 20262 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 14 days, net +23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,619–13,706 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 22:5913,656-18
1 Sept 2026, 17:2513,674-11
31 Aug 2026, 15:5713,685-8
30 Aug 2026, 15:5613,693-3
29 Aug 2026, 18:1713,696+8
28 Aug 2026, 17:0313,688+10
27 Aug 2026, 17:0413,678-4
26 Aug 2026, 15:2813,682+13
25 Aug 2026, 15:1213,669+40
24 Aug 2026, 14:3313,629-44
22 Aug 2026, 22:1913,673+13
21 Aug 2026, 10:3713,660+21
20 Aug 2026, 12:2213,639+6
20 Aug 2026, 07:1513,633no change
20 Aug 2026, 07:0113,633first reading

Engagement

98 posts held, back to 15 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.55%
avg views ÷ 13,656 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,170
96 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.928%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
98
of 98 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 88 of 96 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held98 (15 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total112,047
Reactions total958
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 19:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

958 reactions across 88 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
48450.5%
💋939.71%
🎉919.50%
❤‍🔥565.85%
🔥495.11%
🏆414.28%
😍404.18%
👍293.03%
👏161.67%
🤷‍♂131.36%
🥰101.04%
😁80.835%
🤔50.522%
👀30.313%
💔30.313%
💯30.313%
🤣30.313%
🎅20.209%
😭20.209%
😱20.209%
4 further kinds50.522%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 88 of the 98 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 958 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 98 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 09:25 UTC843 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Let’s chase some green✅ on BET9JA #Bet9jaCode 5PYBDDZ 5PYBJTF 5PYBGT7 5PYBNCF Register with this link https://rt.bet9ja.click/o/7lz91T?lpage=WK3XQp&t1=Freekelvin&site_id=305744

2

1 Sept 2026, 21:17 UTC≈1,000 views19 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

DAY 1 BOOM CONGRATULATIONS IF YOU PLAYED ✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅

12🏆7

1 Sept 2026, 09:07 UTC≈1,150 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Let’s chase some green✅ on BET9JA #Bet9jaCode 5PV5YXQ 5PV6J9L 5PV6L6Y 5PV6MQX Register with this link https://rt.bet9ja.click/o/7lz91T?lpage=WK3XQp&t1=Freekelvin&site_id=305744

1

31 Aug 2026, 23:17 UTC≈1,180 views57 reactionsread 2 September 2026

3 odds rollover for 5 days

38🔥12❤‍🔥7

31 Aug 2026, 18:08 UTC≈1,200 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://x.com/freekelvin_/status/2094418391620591735?s=46 I need you’ll to reply and react to this post if you love me 🥺❤️

2

31 Aug 2026, 06:46 UTC≈1,300 views63 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Sept 1- Dec 31. We locked in.

41🏆19👌1👍1🤔1

30 Aug 2026, 21:32 UTC≈1,330 views26 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

10 ODDS BOOM CONGRATULATIONS IF YOU PLAYED ✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅

👍11🎉75👏2😍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 98 posts we hold for @Pymstake0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 32,871 of 1,629,808 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

𝐀𝐒𝐀™ 𓃵
@theofficialasa · 53,456
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 August 2026
YOUNG BLOOD ⚽🏀 (RISK IT)
@youngblood7777 · 60,732
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 21 August 2026
DR ZEH MILLIONS 🫶💚
@winningtips599 · 40,341
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 August 2026
Vecthor Tips
@vecthortips · 74,237
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
Deenayaah 💵💰
@deenayaahwinwins · 39,420
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
Boss Nation Tips🤞🔑⚽️
@Bossnationn · 39,257
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026
₦200 to win ₦200M
@jaredad · 42,442
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 29 August 2026
BOOCHI TIPS⚽🏀🎾🎯
@boochitips · 65,419
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“KELVIN BET CHANNEL” (@Pymstake0), 13,656 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Pymstake0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.