Channel
@DeathSentenceFAQ
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
120subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002122950192 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DeathSentenceFAQ |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 21 March 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:35 | 120 | +2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:05 | 118 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 117 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:39 | 117 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 21 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 10 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 19 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
🇷🇺🔥Moscow Terror Attack🇷🇺🔥 Behind 🇪🇺 @DeathPenaltyMafia
It's high time to return the death penalty for terrorism, murder and pedophelia at the same time Давно пора вернуть смертную казнь за терроризм, убийство и за педофелию заодно Nope! Right wing terrorism: ✅ https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence https://t.me/TerrorDeutschland/251 to https://t.me/TerrorDeutschland/254 https://t.me/TerrorDeutschland/262 https://t.me/TerrorismTelegram/1308 ☪️ terrorism: depends! https://t…
Amnesty 🇪🇸 1:1 pena de muerte / death penalty Part 7 Part 1 https://t.me/AmnestyOneToOne/95 So again, AMNESTY AND CAROLYN HOYLE (= University of Oxford) ARE FAKE SCIENCE AND INFOS! where Carolyn is 1000x better than Amnesty BUT STILL YEARS AWAY FROM BEING PERFECT! https://t.me/CarolynHoyle Not just them, even John Bessler and co. are BULLSHIT! https://t.me/JohnBessler https://t.me/DeathPenaltyMafia Please don't c…
Amnesty 🇪🇸 1 to 1 about pena de muerte / death penalty facts Part 6 Part 1 https://t.me/AmnestyOneToOne/95 El efecto de la abolición en los índices de delincuencia - The effect of abolition on crime rates En Canadá, por ejemplo, el índice de homicidios por 100.000 habitantes descendió del 3,09 en 1975, el nivel máximo alcanzado y correspondiente al año anterior a la abolición de la pena de muerte para el d…
Amnesty 🇪🇸 1 to 1 about pena de muerte / death penalty facts Part 5 Part 1 https://t.me/AmnestyOneToOne/95 The estimated effects of capital punishment on homicide rates change dramatically even with small changes in econometric specifications!!! https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/328 LIKE WE SAID! is not just about "death penalty yes or no"! It's MORE COMPLEX! Fourth, have all the relevant variables been taken into ac…
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @DeathSentenceFAQ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 11,674 of 1,629,497 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 85 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Death Sentence FAQ : Pros & cons of the death penalty - Avantages et inconvénients de la peine mort - Amnesty Bullshit Leaked” (@DeathSentenceFAQ), 120 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DeathSentenceFAQ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.