Channel
@StuproFatti
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
26subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002048693879 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @StuproFatti |
| Description | Un progetto di @WomenRightsTelegram @GenRevolutionOfficial @FactsTelegramFreaks @RapeTelegram @DefenseFacts @DefenceTelegram @FactsTelegramChannels @LawsTelegram @HumanRightsChannels @HumanRightsChecklist https://t.me/addlist/l6ip-Sstsa8wZDIx |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 28 February 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/StuproFatti |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:03 | 26 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:39 | 26 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 28 February 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 17 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
10 motivi per dire NO alla pena di morte - One to one with Amnesty Italia Part 10 - World day (against) pro death penalty Part 1 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/374 Again, rape is complex! and totally different compared to serial killer and right wing terrorism https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/384 We support death penalty especially for a) child rape https://t.me/DeathSentenceNOW/58 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/286 b…
🤦♂️ En Italie, des gynécologues refusent de pratiquer l'IVG Backup by @StuproFatti A @grttme project - Other backups: https://swiy.co/tgme
Just one of many things WE NEED TO CHANGE! ✅ ABORTION https://t.me/HumanRightsChecklist/115 https://t.me/HumanRightsChecklist/242 https://t.me/HumanRightsChecklist/247 https://t.me/IsraelWarWomenRights/1534 https://t.me/HumanRightsChecklist/185 ✅ SUICIDE https://t.me/LawsTelegram/123 https://t.me/NeverForgetTelegram/30 ✅ DEATH PENALTY https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel/87 ✅ NEW LAWS https://t.me/LawsTelegram https://…
Pena di morte in Italia - Cazzate di Fanpage / Death Penalty Part 6 Part 1 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/313 So again Fanpage.it , less bullshit! https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/328 https://t.me/AmnestyPropaganda/78 So again THIS REPORT IS BULLSHIT! with mafia propaganda! https://t.me/RapeDeathPenalty/17 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/328 and remember that this human right association is citing the other bullshit tea…
Pena di morte in Italia - Cazzate di Fanpage / Death Penalty Part 5 Part 1 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/313 UN: A 2018 report by the U.S.-based Abdorrahman Boroumand Center examined murder rates in eleven countries in the ten years following each country’s abolition of the death penalty. 🤦♂️ 🤣 YOU DON'T NEED TO CHECK ONLY THAT! Check full infos, means when the death penalty is active and used, like https://t.me/…
Quasi un italiano su tre vuole reintrodurre la pena di morte - Cazzate di Fanpage / Death Penalty Part 4 Part 1 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/313 Switzerland banned death penalty JUST BECAUSE OF 4%! https://t.me/PrisonFacts/98 by considering many people are not voting too! so stats are shit! https://t.me/IgnorancePeople/44 https://t.me/IgnorancePeople/37 Senso insicurezza 🙅♂️ Don't come here with the same bullsh…
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @StuproFatti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 73 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fatti sullo stupro e le leggi in Italia su Telegram by GRT : quando non ci sono pene decenti per un terrorista stupratore” (@StuproFatti), 26 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/StuproFatti.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.