Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Den Deniel 18+

Channel

Den Deniel 18+

@DenDeniel359

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

116subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001678546835
TypeChannel
Username@DenDeniel359
Created19 July 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/DenDeniel359

Growth

1151211187 August 2026 — 121 subscribers9 August 2026 — 121 subscribers16 August 2026 — 118 subscribers31 August 2026 — 116 subscribers9 September 2026 — 115 subscribers18 September 2026 — 116 subscribers1167 August 202618 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 42 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 114–122 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 15:19116+1
9 Sept 2026, 10:17115-1
31 Aug 2026, 15:54116-2
16 Aug 2026, 02:23118-3
9 Aug 2026, 03:46121no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:53121first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 6 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10m 36s
Average length
1m 11s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

25 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍832.0%
🔥520.0%
416.0%
🤡312.0%
😢14.00%
😭14.00%
😱14.00%
🤬14.00%
🫡14.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 6 February 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Jul 2026, 14:31 UTC39 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @webmlandVideo

Хохляцкие дроны атаковали гражданские автомобили на пункте пропуска "Чонгар" в Крыму. WebM⚡️2.0 WebM⚡️Original

👍1😱1

12 Mar 2026, 04:21 UTC263 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @boris_rozhinPhoto

Беженцы убитые Израилем во время бомбардировок палаточного лагеря.

👍1🤬1

11 Mar 2026, 04:13 UTC179 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @grpzdcPhoto

18+ Кадры из Брянска. Какие же мрази на хохлах.

👍1

7 Mar 2026, 20:02 UTC152 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @webmlandVideo

Well well well WebM⚡️2.0 WebM⚡️Original

1🤡1

7 Mar 2026, 19:59 UTC135 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @mig41Photo

🔺🔺🔺 Мега-популярный американский блогер Марио Нофаль повторяет то же самое, что постоянно говорим мы: все военно-политические и даже экономические вопросы меркнут на фоне гонки за планетарное лидерство в области искусственного интеллекта. Более того, он называет это главной причиной войны в Иране, пытаясь неуклюже оправдать агрессию США: "Тот, кто контролирует Иран, контролирует Ормузский пролив. Тот, кто контроли

🔥1🤡1

6 Mar 2026, 15:14 UTC98 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @boris_rozhinVideo

Дети убитые коалицией Эпштейна в Минабе.

👍1😭1

6 Mar 2026, 05:59 UTC94 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @webmlandVideo

А عа що воюешь Джон? حال و روز بد همسر یک آمریکایی هنگامی که از مرگ شوهرش در جنگ با ایران مطلع می‌شود/ شاید وقت آن رسیده که همسران و فرزندانتان را به خانه فرا بخوانید، آنها نباید در راه اهداف رژیم اسرائیل جانشان را از دست بدهند. Горе жены американского военного в тот момент, когда она узнаёт о гибели своего мужа в войне с Ираном / Возможно, пришло время позвать домой своих жён и детей — они не должны отдавать жизни

1

3 Mar 2026, 09:25 UTC89 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @KIMMARINAVideo

Легендарный корейский спецназ. Напомню, КНДР единственная на планете страна, которая пришла нам на помощь и беззаветно проливала кровь своих бойцов во время Курской операции. Уникальные кадры, которых в мире никто не видел! Боевая, стрелковая и полит подготовка корейских спецназовцев в условиях Курского плотного леса. Одна полоса препятствий чего стоит! Специалисты поймут.) Еще и в полной секретности от всего мира

1🫡1

3 Mar 2026, 09:22 UTC87 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @auantonovPhoto

— Где ёр битч асс миллионы иранских бабок со сзвездно-полосатым флагом, а? Пит Буль Хегсет мистер ворлдвайд или как там тебя, А?? — Донни, босс, а чо я-то? А чо я-то? Аль-Мевед-ибн-Чуг пророком клялся, что они там…

👍1🤡1

3 Mar 2026, 05:04 UTC106 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @boris_rozhinPhoto

Подготовка могли для похорон детей убитых коалицией Эпштейна в Минабе.

🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @DenDeniel359. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Den Deniel 18+” (@DenDeniel359), 116 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DenDeniel359.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.