Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Der Milchwirt spricht

Channel

Der Milchwirt spricht

@DerMilchwirtSpricht

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,118subscribers

+37 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001387205397
TypeChannel
Username@DerMilchwirtSpricht
Created3 September 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/DerMilchwirtSpricht

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

6,0786,1306,1046 August 2026 — 6,081 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,081 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,078 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,086 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,097 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,103 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,109 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,110 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,117 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,130 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,118 subscribers6,1186 August 20269 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 35 days, net +37. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,070–6,138 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 16:596,118-12
4 Sept 2026, 06:366,130+13
28 Aug 2026, 11:146,117+7
25 Aug 2026, 06:226,110+1
22 Aug 2026, 09:236,109+6
19 Aug 2026, 10:026,103+6
16 Aug 2026, 18:226,097+11
12 Aug 2026, 19:276,086+8
9 Aug 2026, 09:126,078-3
6 Aug 2026, 03:226,081no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:486,081first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 28 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 38s
Average length
2m 38s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

163 reactions across 22 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍15695.7%
👎42.45%
🤔31.84%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 163 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 00:35 UTC≈3,740 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Donald Trump hat am 10. August 2026 per Executive Order neue Leitlinien für die US-Kinderimpfempfehlungen festgelegt. Grundlage ist eine HHS-Bewertung, nach der die USA mehr Kinderimpfungen empfehlen als vergleichbare Industrieländer und viele dieser Länder hohe Impfquoten eher über Aufklärung und Vertrauen als über Pflichtregelungen erreichen. Die Bundesregierung will deshalb den Impfkalender stärker an internationa

👍11🤔2

Signed Hans U. P. Tolzin

10 Aug 2026, 23:46 UTC≈3,730 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Heute spreche ich mal Tacheles, auch wenn es nicht jedem gefallen wird. Auslöser - aber nicht der eigentliche Verursacher - ist eine Kritik des bekannten US-Arztes Dr. Philip McMillan an der Zulassung des neuen mRNA-Grippeimpfstoffs von Moderna. Meine Frage: Warum nur stellen selbst kritische Experten so selten die richtigen Fragen zur Sicherheit und Wirksamkeit? https://tolzin.substack.com/p/beim-neuen-mrna-grippei

👍13

Signed Hans U. P. Tolzin

10 Aug 2026, 09:28 UTC≈1,260 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Jessica Rose kritisiert in ihrem Beitrag die Sicherheitsbewertung von Modernas neuem mRNA-Grippeimpfstoff mRNA-1010 (mFlusiva). In den zugrunde liegenden Studien wurde keine Kochsalz-Placebogruppe verwendet, sondern mit bereits zugelassenen Grippeimpfstoffen verglichen. https://tolzin.substack.com/p/vergleich-mit-placebogruppe-pustekuchen

👍4👎1🤔1

Signed Hans U. P. Tolzin

9 Aug 2026, 22:11 UTC≈1,570 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

--> Ralf Tillenburgs "Lehrbuch zur Behandlung von Schäden der Corona Gen-Injektion", Teil 29 --> Rest-DNA in Covid-Impfstoffen: Woher kommen die unterschiedlichen Ergebnisse? --> USA: Blendet der Strategieplan zur Autismusforschung systematisch Impfungen als Ursache aus? --> Was für einen Zusammenhang zwischen Paracetamol und der Entstehung von Autismus spricht https://tolzin.substack.com/p/tageszusammenfassung-fur-

👍6

Signed Hans U. P. Tolzin

9 Aug 2026, 19:52 UTC≈1,610 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

--> Ivermectin-Behandlung: Niederländische Ärzten drohten bis zu 150.000 Euro Strafe --> Was könnte Erdnuss-Allergien mit Impfungen zu tun haben? https://tolzin.substack.com/p/tageszusammenfassung-fur-samstag-ba0

👍4

Signed Hans U. P. Tolzin

9 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC≈1,560 viewsread 12 August 2026

--> Endlich Vergleich von mRNA mit Placebogruppe? Pustekuchen! --> Gates-Stiftung finanziert die weltweit erste Erzeugung von synthetischen Viren mittels KI https://tolzin.substack.com/p/tageszusammenfassung-fur-freitag-c26

Signed Hans U. P. Tolzin

8 Aug 2026, 20:06 UTC≈1,870 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

--> FDA lässt ersten mRNA-"Impfstoff" gegen Virusgrippe zu --> Die Steine unter der britischen Winterkrisenerzählung --> Abstimmung 8:5 - Senatsausschuss will Fauci wegen Missachtung des Kongresses belangen --> FDA lässt ersten mRNA-Grippeimpfstoff zu - trotz einer Nebenwirkungsrate von 75,3 %! --> USA: Jetzt sind es drei Generalstaatsanwälte, die Fauci vorladen --> Fauci-Tagebücher enthüllen Gates’ Einflussnahme auf

👍6

Signed Hans U. P. Tolzin

8 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC≈1,750 viewsread 12 August 2026

--> WCH: "Die Schwärzungen der Europäischen Arzneimittel-Agentur müssen ein Ende haben!" --> Florida: Staatswanwalt droht katholischen Schulen --> Covid-Impfschaden: Australier erhält 6 Mio. Dollar Entschädigung --> Wurde Anthony Fauci durch Bill Gates ferngesteuert? --> Australien: Offizielle Grippedaten widersprechen Krisen-Szenario --> Was sind die wahren Ursachen von Spina Bifida? --> Die Wirkung von Cheyennepfef

Signed Hans U. P. Tolzin

5 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC≈1,320 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Es scheint von Seiten bestimmter globaler Netzwerke Bestrebungen zu geben, bestimmtes Wissen zu unterdrücken oder ganz zu löschen, um über die kommenden Generationen die absolute Deutungshoheit zu gewinnen. Ich stelle hier meine ganz persönliche (Zwischen-)Lösung für eine nicht so ohne weiteres löschbare Datensicherung vor. https://tolzin.substack.com/p/meine-personliche-losung-fur-eine

👍8

Signed Hans U. P. Tolzin

5 Aug 2026, 00:20 UTC≈1,260 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

--> Das Tagebuch des Anthony Fauci --> US-Regierung finanzierte Ralph Barics Coronavirus-Forschung seit 1984 --> Augen zu und durch: EMA-Impfgremium empfiehlt neue Varianten der Covid-Impfstoffe --> „Supergrippe“: Wie aus einem Laborbefund eine weltweite Grippewarnung wurde --> 12 Pflichtimpfungen: Ungarisches Impfregime in der Kritik --> Paxlovid gegen Long COVID: Die Studie, die keine Antwort gibt — aber Pfizer per

👍5

Signed Hans U. P. Tolzin

4 Aug 2026, 23:42 UTC≈1,180 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Der CHMP-Ausschuss der EMA hat eine Anpassung der COVID-19-Impfstoffe Bimervax, Comirnaty, Nuvaxovid und Spikevax an die neue Virusvariante XFG positiv bewertet. Die Änderung ist für die Impfkampagne 2026/2027 vorgesehen und folgt einer Empfehlung der Notfall-Taskforce der EMA. https://tolzin.substack.com/p/augen-zu-und-durch-ema-impfgremium

👎3

Signed Hans U. P. Tolzin

4 Aug 2026, 15:19 UTC981 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

—> Ist es ein Fehler, Impfstoffe pauschal als "wirksam und sicher" zu behandeln? —> Zensur und Manipulation: RFK greift Mainstream-Medien öffentlich an —> "Was genau habt Ihr gegen diese Studie einzuwenden?" —> Interne EU-Protokolle: Zweifel an mRNA bereits während der Verhandlungen —> Ein Blick hinter das wirkmächtige Mantra "Impfstoffe sind sicher und wirksam" https://tolzin.substack.com/p/tageszusammenfassung-vo

👍3

Signed Hans U. P. Tolzin

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @DerMilchwirtSpricht. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Impfschaden Coronaimpfstoffe
@impfschadencorona · 10,327
35 posts
Rolf Kron - Ärzte stehen auf Offizieller Kanal
@Rolf_Kron · 44,246
18 posts
▫️Rechtsanwältin Beate Bahner
@rechtsanwaeltin_beate_bahner · 82,818
17 posts
Dr. med. Carola Javid- Kistel MITEINANDER MUTIG SEIN- ÄRZTE STEHEN AUF FÜR PATIENTEN.....🙏❤
@miteinander_mutig_sein · 27,312
8 posts
Verbales Vitriol (Dr. Sabine Stebel)
@DrBines_verbales_Vitriol · 8,102
4 posts
Covid-Injektion & Co. Sicherheit - Wirksamkeit - Notwendigkeit
@covidimpf · 14,242
3 posts
Anwälte-für-Aufklärung
@Anwaelte_fuer_Aufklaerung · 48,456
2 posts
Dr. Antonelli
@Italy17 · 1,080
2 posts
🔹 Neuss steht auf!
@neuss_steht_auf · 190
2 posts
Heilkraft der Natur Manufaktur 🍄🌱🍀❤️💚🍄
@Angelika99991111 · 8,532
1 post
BewegungLeipzig
@BewegungLeipzigoffiziell · 2,018
1 post
Diene dem Leben
@DieneDemLeben · 18,421
1 post
Zentrum Gesundheit & Soziales - die alternative Gewerkschaft
@GewerkschaftZentrumGuS · 49
1 post
HAINTZ.media 🇩🇪🇦🇹🇨🇭🇪🇸
@Haintz · 73,033
1 post
Netzwerk kritischer Experten
@NetzwerkkritischerExperten · 11,721
1 post
Sachsen zeigt Gesicht - Kanal zur Gruppe
@SzG_Kanal · 132
1 post
#Klartext #Mut zur #Wahrheit #Erkenntnisse Gewinnen #TRIVIUM leben #Manipulationen abschütteln
@WahrheitErkenntnisManipulation · 202
1 post
✏️ Freie Sachsen Elbflorenz 🤍💚 Region Dresden
@freiesachsen_dresden · 4,222
1 post
Geschichten aus Wikihausen
@geschichten_aus_wikihausen · 10,211
1 post
impfen-nein-danke.de offiziell | Vorsprung durch Wissen
@impfen_nein_danke · 12,316
1 post
In 80 Tagen
@in80tagen · 2
1 post
GST-PB 📡Gesundheits:Stammtisch-Paderborn
@paderborn_gesundheit · 254
1 post
Querdenkerforum, Gastgeber/Moderator: Helmut P. Krause, RA & FAArbR ⚫️🔴🟡🔵
@querdenkerforum · 410
1 post
Simone Voss - EINE LEHRERIN STEHT AUF-
@simonevoss · 39,761
1 post
WIM 📈🏛📣 Freiheit für Wirtschaft Information Meinung
@wim4u · 4,216
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Catherines Blick
@t5mtxr8b · 23,102
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Der Milchwirt spricht” (@DerMilchwirtSpricht), 6,118 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DerMilchwirtSpricht.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.