Mediziner und Wissenschaftler für Gesundheit, Freiheit und Demokratie: https://mwgfd.org
Du suchst stets aktuelle Nachrichten zum Weltgeschehen? Dann abonniere das "Neue Medien Portal: https://t.me/Neue_Medien_Portal
Created
17 September 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
54 measurements spanning 94 days, net +175. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,615–17,937 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 54
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 15:49
17,891
+4
6 Nov 2026, 12:10
17,887
+9
5 Nov 2026, 12:15
17,878
+2
4 Nov 2026, 14:07
17,876
+8
3 Nov 2026, 11:41
17,868
+2
2 Nov 2026, 14:24
17,866
+4
30 Oct 2026, 12:46
17,862
-8
29 Oct 2026, 09:49
17,870
-1
28 Oct 2026, 08:57
17,871
+4
27 Oct 2026, 06:16
17,867
-2
25 Oct 2026, 02:17
17,869
-3
24 Oct 2026, 04:39
17,872
-3
23 Oct 2026, 04:09
17,875
-1
22 Oct 2026, 03:58
17,876
+1
19 Oct 2026, 19:39
17,875
-4
18 Oct 2026, 18:38
17,879
-2
17 Oct 2026, 21:04
17,881
+9
16 Oct 2026, 17:28
17,872
+4
15 Oct 2026, 16:27
17,868
+3
13 Oct 2026, 05:21
17,865
first reading
Engagement
85 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
38.7%
avg views ÷ 17,891 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,930
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 85 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
85 (27 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
221,610
Reactions total
2,307
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 16:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈326
Videos
≈119
Links
≈2,530
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
19m 42s
Average length
1m 39s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,555 reactions across 80 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,335
42.0%
👍
1,285
23.1%
🔥
709
12.8%
😢
618
11.1%
👏
306
5.51%
🙏
167
3.01%
👎
75
1.35%
🤔
39
0.702%
👀
12
0.216%
🕊
9
0.162%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 84 of the 85 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,732 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 12 of 32 posts held from the last 30 days (37.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Der Soldat Jan Reiners berichtet über den Fall eines Kameraden, der durch ein Truppendienstgericht aus dem Dienst entfernt und als ,,Reichsbürger" diffamiert worden ist. Anlass dafür sei lediglich ein schriftlich eingereichter Fragenkatalog zu den möglichen Gefahren der Covid-19-Impfung gewesen. Darüber hinaus äußert Reiners erhebliche Zweifel daran, dass eine ehrliche und umfassende Aufarbeitung der Corona-Zeit in a…
5,8 Milliarden Masken gekauft. 5,9 Milliarden Euro bezahlt. Über 3,4 Milliarden davon vernichtet oder zur Vernichtung vorgesehen. 7 Milliarden Euro Gesamtaufwand – bislang. Dazu 100 anhängige Klagen mit 2,3 Milliarden Euro Streitwert.
Und die Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Berlin meint: kein Anfangsverdacht. Nicht mal ermitteln.
Mitglieder des Netzwerks Kritische Richter und Staatsanwälte und ihm verbundene Anwälte hatt…
6 Jahre. So lange hat das PEI gebraucht, um seine eigene SafeVac-2.0-Studie zu veröffentlichen. Das Ergebnis, kurz zusammengefasst: „Alles im grünen Bereich.“
Schauen wir uns an, was da im grünen Bereich liegt:
→ 740.000 Teilnehmer, aktiv per App befragt – so viele Rückmeldungen wie nie zuvor bei einer Impfung.
→ 1 von 200 meldete eine schwere Nebenwirkung – rund 3.600 Menschen.
→ Über 2.000 gemeldete Todesfälle …
Dazu ein Mechanismus, der sie strukturell unter Druck setzt: Ihr drohen gekürzte Vorhaltepauschalen, falls die Impfquote ihrer Praxis nicht „wunschgemäß“ erfüllt wird. Für sie ist das sittenwidrig – „eine Aufforderung zur Körperverletzung“ und ein „Eingriff in die ärztliche Freiberuflichkeit“.
Wir dokumentieren ihren Fall anonym (#0047) – gerade weil sie nie in der direkten Schusslinie stand. Denn das ist der Punkt:…
Sie taucht in keiner Statistik verfolgter Ärzte auf. Kein Strafbefehl, kein Berufsgericht, keine Durchsuchung. Eine Hausärztin in Schleswig-Holstein, die – in ihren Worten – „unter dem Radar geflogen“ ist. Und die trotzdem am Ende ihrer Kräfte ist.
Als sie 2020 ihre eigene Praxis aufbauen wollte, verzögerte die Pandemie den Einstieg um über ein Jahr. Was danach kam, steht in keiner Anklageschrift – aber es zermürbt:…
Sogar schwangeren Soldatinnen wurde befohlen, sich gegen Corona impfen zu lassen. Dies habe die Schwangeren sehr besorgt, so Intensivkrankenschwester Sabrina Kollmorgen. Für sie sei das mit "nichts" zu vereinbaren, sagt sie, um Fassung ringend.
Ganzes Interview auf unserem YouTube-Kanal mwgfd_tv
https://youtu.be/76_GFB39Uss?is=bT-YdV1leCnCtegV
oder auf unserer Website Geimpft, geschädigt, geleugnet
https://geimpft-…
Haben alle Geimpften immer noch Spikeproteine im Körper?
Die modRNA lässt sich mit einer Gliederkette vergleichen. Sie wird in die Körperzellen eingeschleust und dient dort als Bauanleitung für die Produktion von Spikeproteinen. Natürliche RNA wird durch spezielle Enzyme normalerweise innerhalb von Minuten bis Stunden abgebaut. Sobald die RNA abgebaut ist, endet auch die Produktion der entsprechenden Proteine. Die in…
Mythos von der „Covid-Pandemie“ widerlegt – Ursprung von SARS-CoV-2-Viren unbekannt
In einer Veröffentlichung im Fachjournal ASRP haben unser Mitglied Ulrich Kutschera und sein Stanford-Kollege Rajnish Khanna durch Zahlen belegt, dass es 2020-23 keine „Pandemie“ gab, und dass der Ursprung von SARS-CoV-2 bis heute unbekannt geblieben ist.
https://www.mwgfd.org/2026/11/ursprung-von-sars-cov-2-und-globale-auswirkungen…
Einladung zum gemeinsamen Symposium der Anwälte für Aufklärung und des Vereins MWGFD e.V.
Unter dem Titel „ZWISCHEN GEWISSEN UND SANKTION: Die Verfolgung der Ärzte – und die Zukunft der Gewissensfreiheit“ findet die Veranstaltung vom 27. bis 29. November 2026 in Rüsselsheim statt.
Im Mittelpunkt der Veranstaltung steht nicht nur die Auseinandersetzung mit der Verfolgung kritischer Ärzte in den vergangenen Jahren, s…
Corona-Impfung und Long Covid:
Long-Covid-Symptome waren nach Aussagen von Karl Lauterbach und Prof. Dr. Carmen Scheibenbogen (Charité, Berlin) eine mögliche Impfnebenwirkung. Dazu befragt, sagt Hennig, sie kenne das Zitat nicht wörtlich.
Fremdschutz:
Jens Spahn erklärte in der Enquete-Kommission, der Impfstoff sei niemals für den Fremdschutz entwickelt worden. Dies ist Hennig offenbar unbekannt.
Arbeitsschutzmasken…
Enquete-Kommission Corona zum Thema Wissenschaftsberatung, Krisenkommunikation und Rolle der Medien
Öffentliche Anhörung vom 2. November 2026
Wissenschaftsberatung, Krisenkommunikation und Rolle der Medien
Befragung der NDR-Wissenschaftsjournalistin Korinna Hennig
In der Sitzung der Enquete-Kommission des Deutschen Bundestages am 2. November 2026 zum Thema „Wissenschaftsberatung, Krisenkommunikation und die Rolle der Medien“ richtete Dr. Beate Pfeil, ständige Sachverständige und Mitglied der MWGFD, in der zweiten Fragerunde ihre Fragen an den Medienwissenschaftler Prof. Michael Meyen, der ebenfalls der MWGFD angehört.
Quelle: https://www.bundestag.de/mediathek/video?videoid=76…
👏48👍8❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 85 posts we hold for @MWGFD_Kanal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@MWGFD_Kanal edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
4 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @MWGFD_Kanal as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
13 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
13 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
29 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 75 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 24 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@MWGFD_Kanal named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@norberthaering named in 7 posts, 8 August 2026 – 15 August 2026 · confirmed gone 11 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MWGFD - Mediziner und Wissenschaftler für Gesundheit, Freiheit und Demokratie e.V.” (@MWGFD_Kanal), 17,891 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MWGFD_Kanal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.