Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 5 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
2 more channels are in this same group but not listed individually here.
Growth
23 measurements spanning 90 days, net -92. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,583–3,704 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 09:49
3,597
-1
30 Oct 2026, 04:29
3,598
-7
27 Oct 2026, 13:50
3,605
-6
24 Oct 2026, 16:46
3,611
-7
21 Oct 2026, 15:36
3,618
-2
15 Oct 2026, 15:38
3,620
-7
12 Oct 2026, 06:38
3,627
-10
5 Oct 2026, 09:56
3,637
-18
27 Sept 2026, 14:20
3,655
-6
18 Sept 2026, 05:01
3,661
-2
13 Sept 2026, 23:41
3,663
+6
9 Sept 2026, 21:39
3,657
-6
4 Sept 2026, 18:01
3,663
-11
31 Aug 2026, 23:58
3,674
-3
28 Aug 2026, 14:08
3,677
-1
25 Aug 2026, 18:52
3,678
+3
22 Aug 2026, 21:15
3,675
-4
19 Aug 2026, 15:44
3,679
+6
16 Aug 2026, 21:26
3,673
-9
13 Aug 2026, 14:28
3,682
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
37m 41s
Average length
7m 32s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
13 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
7
53.8%
❤
2
15.4%
👏
2
15.4%
🔥
1
7.69%
😁
1
7.69%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
.
THE NETWORK IS REAL:
WHAT THEY ARE TEACHING, BUILDING & ENFORCING
The phrase "you're a node on the network tethered to the cloud" is not science fiction. It describes the Internet of Bio-Nano Things (IoBNT), a documented engineering field where biological systems interface with digital networks.
Universities globally (Maryland, Munich, Cambridge) are now training engineers to turn human cells into networked data …
10secs
Taking out a Flock camera broad day in San Francisco
More
https://t.me/maninamerica/3564
About Flock cameras
https://t.me/Digital_ID_Au/17223
@Digital_ID_Au
.
.
PG&E SMART METER FIRE ALLEGATIONS AND WHISTBLOWER CLAIMS
PAT WRIGLEY TESTIFIES ABOUT SMART METER FIRES AND RETALIATION
Pat Wrigley, a former PG&E meter reader with over nine years of experience, testified before the California Public Utilities Commission in 2012, alleging that smart meters cause fires and that PG&E is covering up the risk. Wrigley stated he was fired for refusing to stay silent about these safety…
DIGITAL ID Au | public channel pinned «🇦🇺 I just spent over half an hour with Leo AI nutting this out..and another 20 minutes cleaning it up, ready for posting.. Mitch Please read. THE DIGITAL ID REALITY CHECK: WHAT IT MEANS FOR YOUR COFFEE, GROCERIES & DAILY LIFE IN AUSTRALIA August 5, 2026…»
..continuing..
- Data Minimisation:
The architecture of the system is built to share the minimum amount of data necessary.
Proving you are an adult should not require sharing your home address
- The Digital Divide:
A significant concern remains for those without smartphones or reliable internet access. Community services are working to ensure that the transition does not leave vulnerable populations behind
THE ROA…
🇦🇺
I just spent over half an hour with Leo AI nutting this out..and another 20 minutes cleaning it up, ready for posting..
Mitch
Please read.
THE DIGITAL ID REALITY CHECK:
WHAT IT MEANS FOR YOUR COFFEE, GROCERIES & DAILY LIFE IN AUSTRALIA
August 5, 2026
By 2026, the conversation around Australia’s voluntary Digital ID system has shifted from theoretical debate to practical application. For many Australians, the q…
..continuing..
THE SUPERMARKET AISLE:
LOYALTY AND PRIVACY
The grocery sector has been one of the fastest adopters of digital verification, often driven by loyalty programs rather than strict identity laws.
By mid-2026, major Australian supermarkets have integrated Digital ID capabilities directly into their apps.
This integration allows for:
1. Age-Restricted Purchases: Buying alcohol or certain cleaning product…
.
🇦🇺 IMPORTANT - FACTS MATTER
with help from Leo AI . . .
👇
ABOUT DATA CENTRES IN AUSTRALIA
The Surge in Digital Infrastructure
Australia is currently witnessing a massive boom in the construction of data centres. Driven by the rapid adoption of artificial intelligence, cloud computing & the need for secure local data storage, billions of dollars are being invested in facilities across major cities like Sydney, Me…
🍎 Last night, Apple briefly removed Telegram from the App Store because a single user had planted illegal pornographic content in a public group chat.
⬅️ Telegram was restored within hours. But I want to explain what happened — to warn other app developers and help protect online communities from similar attacks.
🧹Because Telegram quickly removes illegal content from public groups using user reports, AI filters, co…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Digital_ID_Au. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Digital_ID_Au named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@aussie_news named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 6 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
CRAIG KELLY - Keeping the bastards honest. @craigkelly · 26,864 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 September 2026
AustraliaOneParty_Official @australiaoneparty_official · 31,848 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DIGITAL ID Au | public channel” (@Digital_ID_Au), 3,597 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Digital_ID_Au.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.