Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DIGITAL ID Au | public channel

Channel

DIGITAL ID Au | public channel

@Digital_ID_Au

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,661subscribers

-28 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001542207430
TypeChannel
Username@Digital_ID_Au
Created6 September 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Digital_ID_Au

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 5 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

1 more channel is in this same group but not listed individually here.

Growth

3,6573,6903,673.57 August 2026 — 3,689 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,690 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,680 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,682 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,673 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,679 subscribers22 August 2026 — 3,675 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3,678 subscribers28 August 2026 — 3,677 subscribers31 August 2026 — 3,674 subscribers4 September 2026 — 3,663 subscribers9 September 2026 — 3,657 subscribers13 September 2026 — 3,663 subscribers18 September 2026 — 3,661 subscribers3,6617 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net -28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,652–3,695 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 05:013,661-2
13 Sept 2026, 23:413,663+6
9 Sept 2026, 21:393,657-6
4 Sept 2026, 18:013,663-11
31 Aug 2026, 23:583,674-3
28 Aug 2026, 14:083,677-1
25 Aug 2026, 18:523,678+3
22 Aug 2026, 21:153,675-4
19 Aug 2026, 15:443,679+6
16 Aug 2026, 21:263,673-9
13 Aug 2026, 14:283,682+2
10 Aug 2026, 10:403,680-10
7 Aug 2026, 05:543,690+1
7 Aug 2026, 01:023,689first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
37m 41s
Average length
7m 32s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍753.8%
215.4%
👏215.4%
🔥17.69%
😁17.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC127 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

. THE NETWORK IS REAL: WHAT THEY ARE TEACHING, BUILDING & ENFORCING The phrase "you're a node on the network tethered to the cloud" is not science fiction. It describes the Internet of Bio-Nano Things (IoBNT), a documented engineering field where biological systems interface with digital networks. Universities globally (Maryland, Munich, Cambridge) are now training engineers to turn human cells into networked data

🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC147 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

. .. continuing on .. * Hacking Risks: LevelBlue: IoB Cybersecurity https://levelblue.com/blogs/security-essentials/the-hidden-risks-of-internet-of-bodies-iob-cybersecurity-in-healthcare-devices * Legal Bans: DWT: WA Microchip Ban (2026) https://www.dwt.com/blogs/employment-labor-and-benefits/2026/03/washington-hb-2303-employee-microchip-implant-ban * CBDC Act: Congress: S.464 No CBDC Act https://www.congres

👍1

6 Aug 2026, 02:29 UTC185 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

10secs Taking out a Flock camera broad day in San Francisco More https://t.me/maninamerica/3564 About Flock cameras https://t.me/Digital_ID_Au/17223 @Digital_ID_Au .

👏2

6 Aug 2026, 02:20 UTC222 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

. PG&E SMART METER FIRE ALLEGATIONS AND WHISTBLOWER CLAIMS PAT WRIGLEY TESTIFIES ABOUT SMART METER FIRES AND RETALIATION Pat Wrigley, a former PG&E meter reader with over nine years of experience, testified before the California Public Utilities Commission in 2012, alleging that smart meters cause fires and that PG&E is covering up the risk. Wrigley stated he was fired for refusing to stay silent about these safety

👍1

6 Aug 2026, 02:08 UTC114 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @OfficialPlandemicVideo

The People are taking the flock camera issue into their own hands.

😁1

5 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTCviews —

DIGITAL ID Au | public channel pinned «🇦🇺 I just spent over half an hour with Leo AI nutting this out..and another 20 minutes cleaning it up, ready for posting.. Mitch Please read. THE DIGITAL ID REALITY CHECK: WHAT IT MEANS FOR YOUR COFFEE, GROCERIES & DAILY LIFE IN AUSTRALIA August 5, 2026…»

5 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC275 viewsread 7 August 2026

..continuing.. - Data Minimisation: The architecture of the system is built to share the minimum amount of data necessary. Proving you are an adult should not require sharing your home address - The Digital Divide: A significant concern remains for those without smartphones or reliable internet access. Community services are working to ensure that the transition does not leave vulnerable populations behind THE ROA

5 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC222 viewsread 7 August 2026

🇦🇺 I just spent over half an hour with Leo AI nutting this out..and another 20 minutes cleaning it up, ready for posting.. Mitch Please read. THE DIGITAL ID REALITY CHECK: WHAT IT MEANS FOR YOUR COFFEE, GROCERIES & DAILY LIFE IN AUSTRALIA August 5, 2026 By 2026, the conversation around Australia’s voluntary Digital ID system has shifted from theoretical debate to practical application. For many Australians, the q

5 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC237 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

..continuing.. THE SUPERMARKET AISLE: LOYALTY AND PRIVACY The grocery sector has been one of the fastest adopters of digital verification, often driven by loyalty programs rather than strict identity laws. By mid-2026, major Australian supermarkets have integrated Digital ID capabilities directly into their apps. This integration allows for: 1. Age-Restricted Purchases: Buying alcohol or certain cleaning product

5 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC118 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Aussie_News

. https://boomfinanceandeconomics.wordpress.com/2026/08/05/jayden-beales-courageous-fight-us-government-funded-coronavirus-work-and-patents-since-1984-fauci-refuses-to-answer-more-than-100-times-what-colour-tie-are-you-wearing-the-end-of-farmin/ @Aussie_News .

👍1

5 Aug 2026, 07:25 UTC211 viewsread 7 August 2026

. 🇦🇺 IMPORTANT - FACTS MATTER with help from Leo AI . . . 👇 ABOUT DATA CENTRES IN AUSTRALIA The Surge in Digital Infrastructure Australia is currently witnessing a massive boom in the construction of data centres. Driven by the rapid adoption of artificial intelligence, cloud computing & the need for secure local data storage, billions of dollars are being invested in facilities across major cities like Sydney, Me

4 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC121 viewsread 7 August 2026

🍎 Last night, Apple briefly removed Telegram from the App Store because a single user had planted illegal pornographic content in a public group chat. ⬅️ Telegram was restored within hours. But I want to explain what happened — to warn other app developers and help protect online communities from similar attacks. 🧹Because Telegram quickly removes illegal content from public groups using user reports, AI filters, co

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Digital_ID_Au. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

CRAIG KELLY - Keeping the bastards honest.
@craigkelly · 27,696
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 September 2026
AustraliaOneParty_Official
@australiaoneparty_official · 32,920
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DIGITAL ID Au | public channel” (@Digital_ID_Au), 3,661 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Digital_ID_Au.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.