Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SENATOR ROBERTS UNCENSORED

Channel

SENATOR ROBERTS UNCENSORED

@senatorroberts

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,023subscribers

-142 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001310816122
TypeChannel
Username@senatorroberts
Created25 May 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/senatorroberts

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 5 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

1 more channel is in this same group but not listed individually here.

Growth

9,0239,1659,0946 August 2026 — 9,165 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,165 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,164 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,155 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,133 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,131 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,103 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,090 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,083 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,069 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,061 subscribers4 September 2026 — 9,052 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,033 subscribers13 September 2026 — 9,024 subscribers18 September 2026 — 9,023 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 43 days, net -142. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,002–9,186 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 02:559,023-1
13 Sept 2026, 12:219,024-9
9 Sept 2026, 09:019,033-19
4 Sept 2026, 07:359,052-9
1 Sept 2026, 00:189,061-8
29 Aug 2026, 08:239,069-14
26 Aug 2026, 06:429,083-7
23 Aug 2026, 09:379,090-13
19 Aug 2026, 16:069,103-28
16 Aug 2026, 06:039,131-2
12 Aug 2026, 09:559,133-22
9 Aug 2026, 15:159,155-9
6 Aug 2026, 20:209,164-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:209,165no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:199,165first reading

Engagement

48 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.93%
avg views ÷ 9,023 subscribers
Avg views / post
896
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 48 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held48 (27 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total8,067
Reactions total601
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2h 50m
Average length
4m 45s

Measured directly from 36 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,367 reactions across 48 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,05847.1%
💯68615.7%
👏50611.6%
🤬3097.08%
2976.80%
🔥2435.56%
🤯601.37%
🙏591.35%
😡461.05%
👎190.435%
🤮160.366%
😁150.343%
🤨150.343%
🤣120.275%
😱60.137%
🏆50.114%
👌50.114%
🕊30.069%
😭20.046%
🤔20.046%
2 further kinds30.069%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,367 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 09:31 UTC309 views21 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

During my second session with AHPRA, I asked their representatives about their neutrality, bureaucratic overreach and entanglement with radical ideological and political advocacy groups. When I asked whether AHPRA caseworkers even possess the basic competence to distinguish between a psychoanalytic view of psychosis and a genuine psychotic disorder, or whether they're weaponising ignorance to take unwarranted action

👍13🔥8

28 Aug 2026, 07:36 UTC394 views18 reactionsread 28 August 2026

During this session with NDIS officials, I questioned them on their progress in tackling fraud within the scheme. Here's an overview of how non-compliance and fraud are being tackled: 👉 29,000 tip-offs received annually, though not all represent actual fraud, with issues ranging from accidental errors to organised crime. 👉 Thousands of Australian Business Numbers are currently placed under manual payment controls

12🙏4👍2

26 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC925 views82 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Government-run industries and state-owned supermarkets sound like a fantasy, yet we all know that when politicians try to control everything, everyday Australians pay the price through total government overreach, inefficiency, and incompetence. Imagine if you will a Greens-run government supermarket: no plastic packaging (bring your own bags and scoop out your purchase), Aboriginal Australians would shop first, then

👍67🤣11🤯4

26 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC873 views74 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Labor's HIGH TAXING Treasurer is robbing young Australians of their chance to own a home by raiding their investments. One Nation believes you should keep more of your own money.

💯38👍341🤯1

26 Aug 2026, 08:37 UTC≈1,090 views120 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

The media tried to smear me to weaken One Nation and they failed. Their pile-on was nothing more than a distraction from the truth now spilling out in the United States. Anthony Fauci's — a primary face of the federal COVID-19 response in the US — own dairies and phone records expose the lies, the cover-ups, and the man-made origins of COVID. These documents show exactly what I've been saying for years. COVID was e

💯74👍24🔥125🙏5

25 Aug 2026, 09:55 UTC986 views81 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

I questioned representatives from AHPRA regarding their heavy-handed and unjustified actions against Dr Amos, an academic psychiatrist from North Queensland. On 26 February 2026, the Medical Board of Australia slapped immediate restrictions on Dr Amos's medical registration, banning him from patient contact and social media commentary on gender. This move was triggered by just four complaints (three were anonymous

😡46👎18👏8👍4😭2🙏21

25 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTC≈1,000 views77 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Australians can't afford Labor's reckless spending. The Labor government introduced legislation to raise fuel excise by 16 cents a litre, which once you add GST and margins, means an extra 32 cents per litre at the pump for families and small businesses. Instead of overtaxing Aussies to fund wasteful projects, a One Nation government would cut the waste. We would: ➡️ Terminate all Net Zero spending, including ass

👍5612👏8🤨1

24 Aug 2026, 09:18 UTC≈1,220 views86 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

One Nation stands with Senator Lambie in calling out Labor's disgraceful treatment of Australian veterans. These men and women put their lives on the line for our country. Their lives. And Labor repays them by forcing them into a broken system where claims drag on for a year, 103,000 cases sit in limbo, and veterans are denied any choice of provider. And now, as if they haven't suffered enough, Labor wants to slap

👍65👏163🙏2

24 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC≈1,270 views42 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

REMINDER: Tomorrow, 25 August 2026 10:00 AM Speakers' Corner, outside Queensland Parliament House, Brisbane See you there!

👍39👏3

20 Aug 2026, 06:14 UTC≈2,310 views130 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

One Nation OPPOSED the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Amendment Bill (No. 2) 2025. 26 YES, 15 NO. Senators Alex Antic and Andrew McLachlan were the only Coalition members to vote no. This Bill was passed because the Liberals and Nationals abstained. If they had opposed the Bill, it would have been defeated. Gutless!

💯83👍24🔥136🤬4

20 Aug 2026, 05:52 UTC≈1,850 views86 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

One Nation OPPOSED the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Amendment Bill (No. 2) 2025. I explain why in this speech. This Bill passed the Senate today. Disgusting! One Nation thanks the many Australians who contacted us either by phone, email or on social media, to urge us to vote NO to this Bill - a Bill that gives the Uniparty Liberal-Labor government control over law abiding Australians. We moved a

🔥46👍28😱5🤯3🙏21👎1

19 Aug 2026, 23:27 UTC≈1,710 views105 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Senator Pauline Hanson: Media Release | 20 August 2026 Labor must come clean on Bondi terror video.

👍55💯35🔥87

Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @senatorroberts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

CRAIG KELLY - Keeping the bastards honest.
@craigkelly · 27,696
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 September 2026
Chef Pete Evans
@ChefPeteEvans · 29,077
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 8 September 2026
Reignite Democracy
@reignitedemocracy · 22,776
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 September 2026
AustraliaOneParty_Official
@australiaoneparty_official · 32,920
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SENATOR ROBERTS UNCENSORED” (@senatorroberts), 9,023 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/senatorroberts.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.