Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SENATOR ROBERTS UNCENSORED

Channel

SENATOR ROBERTS UNCENSORED

@senatorroberts

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,907subscribers

-258 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001310816122
TypeChannel
Username@senatorroberts
DescriptionAuthorised by Malcolm Roberts, Brisbane
Created25 May 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/senatorroberts

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 5 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

2 more channels are in this same group but not listed individually here.

Growth

8,9079,1659,0366 August 2026 — 9,165 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,165 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,164 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,155 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,133 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,131 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,103 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,090 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,083 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,069 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,061 subscribers4 September 2026 — 9,052 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,033 subscribers13 September 2026 — 9,024 subscribers18 September 2026 — 9,023 subscribers27 September 2026 — 9,014 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,989 subscribers12 October 2026 — 8,973 subscribers15 October 2026 — 8,960 subscribers18 October 2026 — 8,951 subscribers21 October 2026 — 8,938 subscribers24 October 2026 — 8,931 subscribers27 October 2026 — 8,936 subscribers29 October 2026 — 8,969 subscribers1 November 2026 — 8,919 subscribers4 November 2026 — 8,907 subscribers6 August 20264 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 90 days, net -258. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,868–9,204 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 15:218,907-12
1 Nov 2026, 15:378,919-50
29 Oct 2026, 22:568,969+33
27 Oct 2026, 09:088,936+5
24 Oct 2026, 12:268,931-7
21 Oct 2026, 07:298,938-13
18 Oct 2026, 12:388,951-9
15 Oct 2026, 06:258,960-13
12 Oct 2026, 03:158,973-16
5 Oct 2026, 06:598,989-25
27 Sept 2026, 05:589,014-9
18 Sept 2026, 02:559,023-1
13 Sept 2026, 12:219,024-9
9 Sept 2026, 09:019,033-19
4 Sept 2026, 07:359,052-9
1 Sept 2026, 00:189,061-8
29 Aug 2026, 08:239,069-14
26 Aug 2026, 06:429,083-7
23 Aug 2026, 09:379,090-13
19 Aug 2026, 16:069,103first reading

Engagement

78 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.4%
avg views ÷ 8,907 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,110
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 78 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held78 (27 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total33,164
Reactions total2,135
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 22:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,410
Videos
≈1,920
Links
≈1,240

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4h 29m
Average length
4m 39s

Measured directly from 58 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

6,502 reactions across 78 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,71641.8%
💯1,39021.4%
👏6359.77%
🤬6189.50%
❤3715.71%
🔥3535.43%
🤯901.38%
🙏711.09%
🤣691.06%
😡570.877%
🤮450.692%
👎190.292%
😁170.261%
🤨150.231%
🎉60.092%
😱60.092%
🤔60.092%
🏆50.077%
👌50.077%
🕊30.046%
3 further kinds50.077%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 78 of the 78 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,502 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 78 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 30 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 10:45 UTC402 views34 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

When supposed leaders fail our defence personnel, the impact is devastating. RAAF veteran Daniel Dare shared his experience with me, and I am reading his letter in full to ensure it becomes part of the public record. Effective discipline must always be grounded in truth, data and facts. It must be fair, proportionate and honest. How is it possible that a career could be crippled by the system meant to protect them?…

💯28🔥5👍1

5 Nov 2026, 09:33 UTC441 views34 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

The message couldn't be clearer - high tobacco taxes are a gift to organised crime. Why won't the government listen? The sensible solution? Cut the tobacco excise and put criminals out of business.

👍28💯3🔥3

5 Nov 2026, 08:37 UTC487 views42 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Truth be damned with this government! Labor says the private sector is creating jobs. The numbers tell a different story. While government-funded employment grows, private businesses are being crushed by rising costs, red tape and net zero policies. Australians need lower power prices, stronger wages and an economy that rewards productive enterprise, not government dependence. Labor's lies aren't going to pay the…

👍35💯6🤯1

5 Nov 2026, 07:12 UTC513 views40 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

State-run supermarkets historically fail. Will the Greens’ proposal to acquire existing Coles and Woolworths sites offer fair compensation, or will they rely on state acquisition tricks similar to what John Howard used to steal farmer’s property rights in the past? While the Greens' policies will add to your cost of living through higher taxes, One Nation's policies will put more money back in your pocket, deliveri…

💯32👍8

5 Nov 2026, 02:34 UTC599 views63 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Coal has historically lifted humanity and developing countries out of poverty, yet reckless net-zero policies and the "green" ideology are putting everyday Australians into poverty with soaring, unaffordable electricity bills. While Labor is forcing the closure of our own reliable, cheap coal-fired power stations, our high-quality coal is shipped overseas to power other nations' manufacturing, industries and standar…

👍36💯24❤2🙏1

4 Nov 2026, 10:35 UTC698 views56 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Critics like Senator Hume and Minister Watt are either misinformed or playing politics with One Nation’s seven-page immigration policy. To be clear: our policy keeps intake numbers completely unchanged for backpackers, PALM workers and the tourism sector. Citing from the Treasury's FIONA model, young, working-age migrants aged 25–35 contribute positively to the economy while older migrants, family reunion programs a…

👍44❤11👏1

4 Nov 2026, 09:37 UTC688 views57 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

"Censorship tells us more about the fears of the censor than it does about the dangers of the message." And trusting governments to censor "responsibly" is far more dangerous than allowing "harmful" or "offensive" speech.

👍28💯24❤4🤬1

4 Nov 2026, 08:35 UTC711 views37 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

40,000 breadwinner jobs. $100 Billion to our GDP. Essential infrastructure for northern Australia, helping to lift remote Aboriginal communities out of poverty. After questioning Minister Farrell on the long-delayed Great Australian Infrastructure (GAIN) proposal, I'm pleased the NAIF has now provided clear direction - the ball is now in the project sponsor's court. Let's get this vital project moving!

👏32🤔4❤1

4 Nov 2026, 07:10 UTC758 views65 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Labor is turning Australia's largest food producing farms into carbon credits. Try eating those! 😠

🤬56🔥9

4 Nov 2026, 02:32 UTC811 views60 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

The hard truth about Australia’s jobs and migration crisis: ✅​ 1.68 million Australians are now unemployed or underemployed (up from 1.35M in 2022). ✅​ Real wages have fallen by 1.5% since this government took power. ✅​ Over 70% of new jobs are in the taxpayer-funded care economy, not the private sector. During Question Time, I questioned Minister Gallagher on how high migration creates a labour glut that suppres…

💯49👍9🤬2

3 Nov 2026, 09:18 UTC936 views69 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Experts say the Under 16 social media ban is a total failure.

🔥34🤣19👍8💯8

3 Nov 2026, 08:33 UTC≈1,050 views43 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

For the past year, human assessors were strictly prohibited from overriding computer decisions (even when clinically wrong), leading to under-assessments, long waiting lists and a sixfold surge in appeals, with elderly Australians dying before their reviews were resolved. This AI decision-making system is part of a broader pattern of attacks by the Albanese Government on our elderly. Basically stealing money from p…

🔥29😡11❤2🤬1

Showing the 12 most recent of 78 posts we hold for @senatorroberts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @senatorroberts as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
15 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
15 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

CRAIG KELLY - Keeping the bastards honest.
@craigkelly · 26,864
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 September 2026
Chef Pete Evans
@ChefPeteEvans · 28,361
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 8 September 2026
Reignite Democracy
@reignitedemocracy · 22,191
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 September 2026
AustraliaOneParty_Official
@australiaoneparty_official · 31,848
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SENATOR ROBERTS UNCENSORED” (@senatorroberts), 8,907 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/senatorroberts.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.