#تدبر ╰🌼🍃╮ ﴿الَّذينَ يُنفِقونَ أَموالَهُم بِاللَّيلِ وَالنَّهارِ سِرًّا وَعَلانِيَةً﴾ قدم الليل على النهار والسر على العلانية للإيذان بمزية الإخفاء على الإظهار. ╰🌼🍃╮ @Dorrlltdbr إقرأ 📚 وأنشر 📩 تُؤجر للتواصل @ManarRiad
Signed Manar RIAD

Channel
@Dorrlltdbr
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
18,305subscribers
-374 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001007456162 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Dorrlltdbr |
| Description | 📌تهدف القناة إلى إحياء رتبتي التدبر والعمل بكتاب الله، ومساعدة المتعبدين بالقرآن من تحقيق مراتبه الخمس وهي : الإستماع والتلاوة والحفظ والتدبر والعمل . ⤵️⤵️⤵️ |
| Created | 27 October 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 5 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Dorrlltdbr |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @Dorrwfwaed/219419 Apr 2026, 10:46 UTC | @Dorrlltdbr/12469 · this entry19 Apr 2026, 10:47 UTC | 1.00 | 72 seconds |
| @Dorrwfwaed/219619 Apr 2026, 12:24 UTC | @Dorrlltdbr/12473 · this entry19 Apr 2026, 12:26 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @Dorrlltdbr/12471 · this entry19 Apr 2026, 12:26 UTC | @Dorrwfwaed/219819 Apr 2026, 12:26 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @Dorrwfwaed/218816 Jul 2025, 12:10 UTC | @Dorrlltdbr/12463 · this entry16 Jul 2025, 12:11 UTC | 0.99 | under a minute |
| @Dorrwfwaed/21795 Jun 2025, 14:59 UTC | @Dorrlltdbr/12456 · this entry5 Jun 2025, 15:00 UTC | 0.99 | under a minute |
| @Dorrwfwaed/21848 Jul 2025, 12:00 UTC | @Dorrlltdbr/12459 · this entry8 Jul 2025, 12:00 UTC | 0.98 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @Dorrwfwaed | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.99 | under a minute | @Dorrwfwaed (5–1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 7 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 June 2025 to 19 April 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @Dorrwfwaed. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 12:47 | 18,305 | -4 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 13:56 | 18,309 | -5 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 15:08 | 18,314 | -8 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 17:39 | 18,322 | -4 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 20:54 | 18,326 | -1 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 23:58 | 18,327 | -5 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 00:56 | 18,332 | -5 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 21:47 | 18,337 | -5 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 21:16 | 18,342 | -7 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 22:06 | 18,349 | -5 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 21:58 | 18,354 | +3 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 19:28 | 18,351 | -13 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 17:48 | 18,364 | +5 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 20:11 | 18,359 | +1 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 18:19 | 18,358 | -14 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 11:27 | 18,372 | -6 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 08:38 | 18,378 | -5 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 10:37 | 18,383 | -5 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 10:04 | 18,388 | -7 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 07:04 | 18,395 | first reading |
26 posts held, back to 4 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 26 (4 June 2025 – 12 October 2026) |
| Views total | 2,330 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 15:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 2 posts held from the last 30 days (50.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#تدبر ╰🌼🍃╮ ﴿الَّذينَ يُنفِقونَ أَموالَهُم بِاللَّيلِ وَالنَّهارِ سِرًّا وَعَلانِيَةً﴾ قدم الليل على النهار والسر على العلانية للإيذان بمزية الإخفاء على الإظهار. ╰🌼🍃╮ @Dorrlltdbr إقرأ 📚 وأنشر 📩 تُؤجر للتواصل @ManarRiad
Signed Manar RIAD
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed Manar RIAD
#وقفات_للتفكر ╰🌸🍃╮ 🔴 مفيده لا تؤجل قراءتها ، وبآذن الله سوف ترسلها لاحبائك : نـام إبراهيم ابن الرسول صلى الله عليه وسلم في حضن أمه مارية ، وكان عمره ستة عشر شهراً، والموت يرفرف بأجنحته عليه ، والرسول عليه الصلاة والسلام ينظر إليه ويقول له : يا إبراهيم أنا لا أملك لك من الله شيئاً ..! ومات إبراهيم وهو آخر أولاده ، فحمله الأب الرحيم ووضعهُ فالقبر ، وقال له : يا إبراهيم إذا جاءتك الملائكة فقل لهم : الله ربي .. ورسو…
Signed Manar RIAD
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed Manar RIAD
#وقفات_للتفكر ╰🌸🍃╮ إعجاز التقديم والتأخير في سورتي الأعراف ويونس: دقة اللفظ القرآني بقلم/ محمد عبدالوهاب عمرك سألت نفسك.. هو ليه الترتيب في القرآن بيتغير من آية للتانية رغم إن الكلمات واحدة؟ تخيل إن تقديم كلمة أو تأخيرها مش مجرد "تغيير لفظي"، ده إعجاز يحير العقول ودقة مرعبة بتقول لنا إن كل حرف في الكتاب ده مرسوم بميزان إلهي دقيق. تعالوا بينا نعيش النهاردة مع نظرة متأملة في آيتين، للوهلة الأولى تحس إنهم زي بعض، بس …
Signed Manar RIAD
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed Manar RIAD
#وقفات_للتفكر ╰🌸🍃╮ سفينة التايتانيك صنعها مئات الأشخاص وقال قائدها : حتى القدر لا يستطيع إغراق هذه السفينة فغرقت في أول رحلةٍ لها . 👈 بينما سفينة نوح عليه السلام صنعها شخص واحد وَقَالَ ارْكَبُوا فِيهَا بِسْمِ اللَّهِ مَجْرَاهَا وَمُرْسَاهَا ۚ إِنَّ رَبِّي لَغَفُورٌ رَّحِيمٌ فغرق العالم كله وهي الوحيدة التي نجت. 👈 عليك أن تعرف لمن تلجأ، وبمن تستعين، وبمن تُعلِّق قلبك، وعلى من تتوكل...👌 قال تعالى: وَمَن يَتَو…
Signed Manar RIAD
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed Manar RIAD
#تدبر ╰🌸🍃╮ لماذا نقرأ سورة الكهف يوم الجمعة؟! 🕋 سورة الكهف.. تشمل: ٤ قصص = ٤ فتن= ٤ قوارب نجاة ١- أصحاب الكهف = فتنة الدين قصة شباب مؤمنين كانوا يعيشون في بلده كافرة فعزموا على الهجرة والفرار بدينهم بعد مواجهة بينهم وبين قومهم. 💚 كافأهم الله برحمة الكهف ورعاية الشمس... استيقظوا فوجدوا القرية مؤمنة بكاملها! 💦 قارب النجاة منها: (الصحبة الصالحة). ٢- صاحب الجنتين = فتنة المال والولد قصة رجل أنعم الله عليه فنسى وأها…
Signed Manar RIAD
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed Manar RIAD
#كل_يوم_فائدة ╰🌸🍃╮ قال رسول -ﷺ-: قال الله عز وجل: «إِذَا هَمَّ عَبدِي بِسَيِّئةٍ فَلا تَكتُبُوهَا عَلَيهِ، فَإنْ عَمِلَهَا فَاكتُبُوهَا سَيِّئَة، وَإِذَا هَمَّ بِحَسَنَةٍ فَلَمْ يَعْمِلهَا فَاكْتُبُوهَا حَسَنَة، فَإِنْ عَمِلَهَا فَاكْتُبُوهَا عَشْراً». ⤶|[#صحيح_مسلم (١٢٨)]| سُئِلَ #سُفيَانْ_الثَّوْرِيّ: كَيفَ تَعلَمُ المَلائِكَةُ أَنَّ العَبدَ قَدْ هَمَّ بِحَسَنَةٍ أَو سَيِّئَةٍ؟ قَالَ: إِذَا هَمَّ العَبد…
Signed Manar RIAD
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed Manar RIAD
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @Dorrlltdbr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 117 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“💎 دُرَرٌ للتَدَبُّر 💎” (@Dorrlltdbr), 18,305 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dorrlltdbr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.