#dotask dots, saran pair muse BxG dong! :3

Channel
DotFess: OPEN
@DotFess
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
31,032subscribers
-1,125 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001218546849 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DotFess |
| Description | Now entering: Daily ✪ MF: @DotFessMFbot ✪ PENGADUAN & KRITIK: @.DotFessbot (Tidak untuk send MF) ✪ ARCHIVE: @DotFesss ✪ PP: SOON. ㅤㅤ |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 48 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DotFess |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Oct 2026, 04:27 | 31,032 | -14 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 02:54 | 31,046 | -22 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 01:11 | 31,068 | -8 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 19:59 | 31,076 | -20 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 16:31 | 31,096 | +1 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 14:46 | 31,095 | -27 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 12:06 | 31,122 | -5 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 12:45 | 31,127 | -14 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 16:16 | 31,141 | -16 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 13:28 | 31,157 | -15 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 04:46 | 31,172 | -38 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 00:22 | 31,210 | -71 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 15:15 | 31,281 | -125 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 08:36 | 31,406 | -41 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 08:40 | 31,447 | -28 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 21:21 | 31,475 | -12 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 22:20 | 31,487 | -7 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 09:59 | 31,494 | -34 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 10:17 | 31,528 | -57 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 14:39 | 31,585 | first reading |
Engagement
2,496 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 134 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.287%
- avg views ÷ 31,032 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 88.9
- 1,075 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 3.98%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 1,075
- of 2,496 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 225 of 1,075 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 2,496 (6 August 2026 – 24 October 2026) |
| Views total | 95,611 |
| Reactions total | 853 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Oct 2026, 05:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈15,100
- Videos
- ≈197
- Links
- ≈2,690
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1m 55s
- Average length
- 13s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
821 reactions across 185 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 325 | 39.6% | |
| ❤ | 194 | 23.6% | |
| 🤩 | 183 | 22.3% | |
| 👀 | 49 | 5.97% | |
| 💯 | 40 | 4.87% | |
| 🆒 | 15 | 1.83% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 0.974% | |
| 🏆 | 7 | 0.853% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 211 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 821 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 26 September 2026 to 24 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#dotask udah oke belum dots?
💯1
#dotask ukuran banner untuk ch berapa ya?
#dotask saranin theme untk keonho dong yang soft yya!
#dotask wdyt? worth to sell gaa?
#dotask foto jaehyun yg ini cocok nya tema apa ya?
#dotask Widayat, dots? Ada yang perlu diperbaiki ngga?
#dotask dotss foto ian yang inii cocoknya pake theme apa yaa?
#dotask minta kritsarnya dong hehe, sekalian ini udah masuk theme clean girl kan ya? Thanks in advance! :]
🔥1
#dotask biasanya yuha diship sama BG siapa ya?
#dotask untuk tone nya udah pas kah ?
#dotask dots apakah posisinya sudah oke..
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,496 posts we hold for @DotFess. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@leurreicy · 12,2818 posts𝓐lsaeraa. CEK PINNED.
@alsaeraa · 11,5945 postsTROVEERT
@Troveert · 15,7234 postsWaterparkv. (CEK PINNED.)
@waterparkv · 8,9354 postsDOTFESS RECORDS.
@Dotfesss · 1181 postImayihelpyou
@fflameries · 41 postlouriette – s archive ୨୧
@louriettes · 171 postaiya—lovyaey
@lovyaey · 2,1111 post.
@Muythical · 31 postPROFILFESS: open! 🏇🏻
@Profilfess · 16,9251 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Dotfesss · 1188 posts✚ ƧETTLĘ
@secttle · 5,3337 posts🇵🇸🇵🇸
@plibisanja · 17,8475 posts໒꒱. . 𝘱𝘶𝘳𝘱𝘭𝘺𝘯 ♡⁺
@purplyn · 5095 posts𝒟.𝒞. (minimal subs kalau pake material sini)
@demacuit · 8,7474 posts⋆˚💕𝑅ᥡᥙ'᥉ 𝒜rchιvᥱs🍋.ᐟᐟ
@ryuheesarchives · 8,1114 postsSHEVARS.
@shevars · 2,8824 postsTelegram
@cleysasi · 17,7983 postsDF: DORM
@DFDORM · 3,4693 posts𝘭𝘶𝘮𝘺─𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘴 𐴲᭡ ᩧ𓈒
@Lumytals · 9,6933 posts+𝟸𝟷 𝚖𝚒𝚖𝚒-𝚋𝚞𝚗𝚜 `
@mimibuns · 4,1103 posts˖ ࣪ 🐹🪽𝓗ams ֢ 💕— ⊹
@Hamsterials · 11,5732 postsn &, liné.
@noireline · 8,0912 postswaffle-pop ♡
@wafflepop · 5,8232 posts𐚁 w—craft
@wishycraft · 3,2902 postsadek sean
@angkringyz · 7,2741 postarebonheur 🩷
@arebonheur · 16,4711 postRPIN. Baejoohyun helper
@badejoohyun · 4771 postجيمَايْن ﹫
@cccbez · 11 post—🪷 | Nillo onnie -
@Nillonnie · 71 postPROFILFESS: open! 🏇🏻
@Profilfess · 16,9251 postCHROMA:TORY
@Ryderix · 1,3331 post✿︭ ۪ 🪻 ۫ ⊹ Scribblesy ִ ּ♡!
@scribblesy · 17,8291 postᡣ𐭩ྀི◡ soreiinly.𝚆 ꒱
@soreiinly · 2471 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DotFess: OPEN” (@DotFess), 31,032 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DotFess.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.