Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝘭𝘶𝘮𝘺─𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘴 𐴲᭡ ᩧ𓈒

Channel

𝘭𝘶𝘮𝘺─𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘴 𐴲᭡ ᩧ𓈒

@Lumytals

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,859subscribers

+244 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002180213034
TypeChannel
Username@Lumytals
Created22 June 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Lumytals

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,61510,0699,8426 August 2026 — 9,615 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,615 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,616 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,645 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,040 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,055 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,064 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,069 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,064 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,045 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,913 subscribers24 August 2026 — 9,907 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,899 subscribers30 August 2026 — 9,890 subscribers3 September 2026 — 9,875 subscribers12 September 2026 — 9,862 subscribers16 September 2026 — 9,859 subscribers9,8596 August 202616 September 2026
17 measurements spanning 40 days, net +244. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,547–10,137 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 00:429,859-3
12 Sept 2026, 10:419,862-13
3 Sept 2026, 10:119,875-15
30 Aug 2026, 22:269,890-9
27 Aug 2026, 14:499,899-8
24 Aug 2026, 05:129,907-6
20 Aug 2026, 16:569,913-132
19 Aug 2026, 14:4310,045-19
18 Aug 2026, 14:2410,064-5
17 Aug 2026, 13:1910,069+5
16 Aug 2026, 06:5410,064+9
14 Aug 2026, 20:1910,055+15
13 Aug 2026, 13:1610,040+395
10 Aug 2026, 02:319,645+29
7 Aug 2026, 02:229,616+1
6 Aug 2026, 23:009,615no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:489,615first reading

Engagement

48 posts held, back to 22 June 2024the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.71%
avg views ÷ 9,859 subscribers
Avg views / post
268
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.606%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 48 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held48 (22 June 202426 August 2026)
Views total535
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 04:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

867 reactions across 29 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
43349.9%
💘9310.7%
🏆758.65%
🎉515.88%
🤩505.77%
🆒465.31%
🕊364.15%
👏232.65%
💊212.42%
👀202.31%
❤‍🔥192.19%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 867 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2024 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 45 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Lumytals. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 48 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 June 2024 to 26 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Aug 2026, 03:17 UTC205 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @FearlyrosePhoto

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ corral wide: exclusive material ..♥ the calescent evermore / glassenlike teacups on linen. ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ

24 Aug 2026, 07:09 UTC330 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @FearlyrosePhoto

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ corral wide: exclusive material ..♥ the calescent evermore / glassenlike teacups on linen. ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ

❤‍🔥2

23 Aug 2026, 04:47 UTC543 views4 reactionsread 29 August 2026

I hope those who live there remain protected and safe ❤️‍🩹

4

23 Aug 2026, 04:44 UTC547 views9 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @AllEyesOnNTTPhoto

Indonesia still needs our voices. 🇮🇩 Please help forward this to your bases, communities, and friends. The wider it spreads, the more people can see, know, and care. Let’s keep speaking up.

9

17 Aug 2026, 02:47 UTC917 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @FearlyrosePhoto

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ corral wide: exclusive material ..♥ the calescent evermore / glassenlike teacups on linen. ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ

17 Aug 2026, 02:47 UTC888 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @FearlyrosePhoto

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ corral wide: exclusive material ..♥ the calescent evermore / glassenlike teacups on linen. ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ

16 Aug 2026, 01:12 UTC695 views12 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @AllEyesOnNTTPhoto

let’s keep nusa tenggara timur in our prayers. our hearts are with everyone who has been affected by the earthquake, especially those who are facing loss, fear, and uncertainty. may god give strength to every family going through this difficult time, protect those who are still searching for their loved ones, and bring hope to those who have lost their homes and everything they once had. we pray for the victims who l

12

14 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC≈1,040 views5 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Izin jelasin ya guys. Ini orang chat gue ga dibales-bales selama beberapa hari, padahal gue lagi pengen banget nagih janji dia itu. Tapi dari dulu kabur terus. Katanya dia kabur join di @FEARLYROSE gitu guys join exclusive material mereka. Apalagi @FEARLYROSE ini harga joinnya nya worth it abis, KACAW

🕊5

14 Aug 2026, 01:42 UTC≈1,060 views0 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @beautytalsVideo

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ౨ৎ. : exclusive of material T.me/fearlyrose ౨ৎ. : ipv qris deco T.me/fearlyrose / 𝘭𝘦𝘵'𝘴 𝘨𝘰 𝘫𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘮𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘱 𝘵𝘰 𝘨𝘦𝘵 𝘣𝘦𝘢𝘶𝘵𝘺 𝘪𝘱𝘷 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘤𝘰𝘰𝘭 𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘭. . (𝚒.) encountering scarabaeid, criatura deemed adorable during perambula. sugared anecdotes amidst gingham satchels, porcelain parchment cranes. companionship aligned alongside composure tableau. ㅤ ㅤ

12 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC≈1,140 views0 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @FearlyrosePhoto

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ corral wide: exclusive material ..♥ the calescent evermore / glassenlike teacups on linen. ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ

Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @Lumytals. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝘭𝘶𝘮𝘺─𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘴 𐴲᭡ ᩧ𓈒” (@Lumytals), 9,859 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lumytals.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.