Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 43 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,523–5,569 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 18:15
5,553
-7
13 Sept 2026, 05:59
5,560
+1
9 Sept 2026, 14:58
5,559
-5
4 Sept 2026, 04:38
5,564
+7
31 Aug 2026, 10:25
5,557
+29
28 Aug 2026, 00:24
5,528
-9
25 Aug 2026, 01:57
5,537
-3
21 Aug 2026, 19:03
5,540
-4
18 Aug 2026, 13:57
5,544
-3
15 Aug 2026, 19:13
5,547
+2
12 Aug 2026, 15:04
5,545
-3
9 Aug 2026, 09:11
5,548
-5
6 Aug 2026, 05:25
5,553
+1
6 Aug 2026, 03:34
5,552
no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:38
5,552
first reading
Engagement
30 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 30 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
125 reactions across 23 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
61
48.8%
👍
27
21.6%
🔥
15
12.0%
💯
14
11.2%
👏
5
4.00%
👌
2
1.60%
🤔
1
0.8%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 136 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
▫️
#ملف_الأسبوع
#التنفس_التحويلي
#Breathwork
ماذا يحدث فعلاً داخل جلسة «التنفّس التحويلي »؟
◇ قد يظن البعض أن جلسات Breathwork هي مجرد استلقاء وتنفس بطريقة معينة.
لكن عندما تراجع ما تقوله 9D وSOMA عن نفسيهما، تتغير الصورة تماماً.
◇• نحن لا نتحدث عن تمرين واحد للتنفس.
بل عن تجربة مصممة لإحداث حالة نفسية وجسدية غير اعتيادية، ثم توجيه المشارك داخل هذه الحالة بالصوت والموسيقى والإيحاء والتصور والتفسير الروحي.
🔳 في 9D:…
▫️
▫️
#ملف_الأسبوع
#التنفس_التحويلي
#Breathwork
💢 تنفَّس بعمق… حرِّر الصدمات المخزنة في جسدك… أعد برمجة عقلك الباطن… ارفع ذبذبتك… وغيّر واقعك!
قد تبدو الجملة خليطاً مبالغاً فيه من عبارات التنمية والروحانيات…
لكنها تلخّص بصورة مدهشة ما أصبح يُقدَّم اليوم تحت اسم:
Breathwork | التنفّس التحويلي
🔻 فالموضوع لم يعد مجرد شهيق وزفير أو تمرين للاسترخاء.
◇ في أنظمة معاصرة مثل 9D Breathwork يدخل الشخص جلسة يرتدي سماعات، وي…
▫️
#ملف_الأسبوع
#التنفس_التحويلي_ الحديث
9D Breathwork
SOMA Breath
Breathwork
كيف انتقل التنفس من وظيفة فيسيولوجية ؛
إلى الادعاءات عن «تحرير الصدمات» و«رفع الذبذبات» !!
•• ليست مجرد مبالغة علمية عابرة؛ فقد تكون بوابة إلى مفاهيم أوسع مثل «الوعي الكوني» و«الكارما» و«وحدة الوجود».
••• ما يبدأ كتمرين للتنفس والاسترخاء، قد ينتهي ــ بمنظومة روحية متكاملة، تُعيد تفسير الإنسان والكون والشفاء والواقع من خلال مفاهيم مث…
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
ماذا عن الطيبات ؟!
ندوة علمية مع نخبة من المتخصص
الجزء الأول من اللقاء الأول
https://youtu.be/Bb6o6E2qI-Q?si=8Sp4c62yEoBXF-0T
الجزء الثاني من اللقاء الأول
https://youtu.be/YTS0H1Kjqa4?si=982jWNPuxMiy_QY8
الجزء الثالث
https://youtu.be/8WAQPTf3JRA?si=v4Ya8j7q6oj_E63T
الجزء الرابع
https://youtu.be/UexD-12DXH8?si=Sn2OYNYNbTVnPeCp
#sawn_al_akol
▫️
#معتقدات_باطنية_وليست_علم
#علوم_زائفة
«الوعي يصنع الواقع»/2
أبرز الآثار العقدية الخطيرة الناتجة عن هذا الفكر، هي أنها تنسف أركان الإيمان من أساسها.
◻ ١. مخالفة صريحة للإيمان بالله (مسألة الخلق):
الخلق هو أخص خصائص الربوبية، فجعلوه للفكر والإنسان، وجعلوا الملك والتدبير للكون.
يقول شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية - رحمه الله -: "إن هؤلاء، حقيقة أمرهم جحد الخالق، فإنهم جعلوا وجود المخلوق هو وجود الخالق، وقالوا الوجود…
▫️
#معتقدات_باطنية_وليست_علم
#علوم_زائفة
«الوعي يصنع الواقع»/1
◇ التعريف :
الفكر قوة كونية أو ميتافيزيقية تؤثر مباشرة في المادة والأحداث، ولو من غير سبب حسي أو فعل متناسب. وتطرح برامج قائمة حالياً أو حديثة عبارات مثل "الخلق الواعي"، و"تصميم الواقع النهائي"، و"الانتقال بين احتمالات متعددة"، و"تحويل النية إلى تجربة واقعية".
◇ جذورها وتطورها عبر المدارس:
▣ مدرسة الفكر الجديد (New Thought):
• يُعد كتاب برن…
▫️
#معتقدات_باطنية_وليست_علم
الوعي يصنع الواقع.
من جذورها في الثيوصوفيا إلى تسويقها الحديث بـ 'القفز الكمي'
◇ نناقش لماذا هي ليست علمًا؟
◇ ولماذا لا يمكن للإنسان أن يكون خالقًا لما حوله بمجرد فكره؟!!
http://t.me/Easternphilosophies
⏬
▫️
#ملف_الأسبوع
#القفز_الكمي
#قانون_الجذب
#Quantum_Jumping
كيف تم استغلال الفيزياء لتسويق القفز الكمي؟
من يقرأ إعلانات دورات
Quantum Jumping
Quantum Manifestation
Quantum Timeline
سيلاحظ تكرار كلمات مثل:
Quantum
Frequency
Observer
Quantum Field
Multiverse
Timeline
>> فيظن أن هذه الممارسات مبنية على أحدث ما توصل إليه علم الفيزياء.
□ لكن هل هذا صحيح؟
أولاً: ما هي القفزة الكمّية؟
في الفيزياء،
القفزة الكمّية (Q…
▫️
#ملف_الأسبوع
#القفز_الكمي
#قانون_الجذب
بين «اختيار الخط الزمني» والسعي في قدر الله
المشهد:
وادٍ لا زرع فيه،
ورضيع يشتد به العطش،
ولا أسباب ظاهرة للنجاة....
🔳 لم تنتظر هاجر أن «يرتفع ترددها»،
ولم تتصل بـ«نسختها المستقبلية»،
ولم تتخيّل واقعاً موازياً؛
بل .....
□ أحسنت الظن بالله.
تحركت وبحثت وسعت.
أخذت بالأسباب المتاحة.
جاء الفرج بتقدير الله، لا بقوة الوعي ولا باستجابة الكون.
القفز الكمي يقول:
✖️غيّر وع…
💯7
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @Easternphilosophies. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Easternphilosophies edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
أيّ هذه العناوين أو الأسماء صادفته أكثر في الإعلانات والدورات؟
القفز الكمي / Quantum Jumping11%
تغيير الخط الزمني / Quantum Timeline11%
الاتصال بالذات المستقبلية / Future Self6%
لم أصادف أيا منها78%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
| اسأل البيضاء | @ask_albaydha · 33,080 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 September 2026
"فضل لاحول ولا قوة الا بالله🌿💛" @Noni_1022 · 33,878 Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فلسفات شرقية” (@Easternphilosophies), 5,553 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Easternphilosophies.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.