في اسأل البيضاء .. تجد جواباً شافياً، ودليلاً كافياً • قناة اسأل البيضاء: https://t.me/ask_albaydha

Channel
| اسأل البيضاء |
@ask_albaydha
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
33,080subscribers
-137 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001079562322 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ask_albaydha |
| Description | تجدون هنا الإجابة على أسئلتكم واستفساراتكم حول الإشكالات المتعلقة بالباطنية الحديثة وتطبيقاتها. يُسعدنا استقبال أسئلتكم واستفساراتكم على المعرّف التالي: @AlbaydhaQ 🎥شاهد الفيديو التعريفي: https://youtu.be/mML4LeKmZ64 |
| Created | 14 June 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ask_albaydha |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 13:56 | 33,080 | -11 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 03:00 | 33,091 | -23 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 09:16 | 33,114 | -4 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 18:58 | 33,118 | +6 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 16:21 | 33,112 | -18 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 15:37 | 33,130 | +40 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 19:55 | 33,090 | -11 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:26 | 33,101 | -6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:52 | 33,107 | -9 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:09 | 33,116 | -19 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:54 | 33,135 | +27 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:25 | 33,108 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:24 | 33,113 | +1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 33,112 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 33,114 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:24 | 33,119 | -13 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 06:58 | 33,132 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 33,134 | -14 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 33,148 | -10 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 04:42 | 33,158 | first reading |
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 5 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 75 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.32%
- avg views ÷ 33,080 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,750
- 6 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 6
- of 27 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (5 April 2026 – 19 September 2026) |
| Views total | 16,520 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 18:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈669
- Videos
- ≈56
- Links
- ≈1,400
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2m 33s
- Average length
- 51s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
File, posted without a caption
العلاج العطري: تحويل الروائح إلى نقود مقال من ترجمة البيضاء، للقراءة: https://albaydha.sa/articales/single/160?0=6
File, posted without a caption
متشكك يدخل أعرجًا لجلسة ريفلكسولوجي مقال من ترجمة البيضاء، للقراءة: https://albaydha.sa/articales/single/159?0=6
#العقل_الباطن #التنويم_المغناطيسي رقم | ع / ٢ / ٣٢ تاريخ | ١٧ / ٣ / ١٤٤٨ هـ •السؤال: هل جلسة الـ QHHT مفعولها حقيقي؟ ــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ •الإجابة: الحمدلله والصلاة والسلام على رسول الله وبعد: فإن تقنية (QHHT) هي جلسات علاجية مزعومة، أسستها الأمريكية (دولوريس كانون) ت ٢٠١٤م، ثم أكملت ابنتها هذا العلاج، وقد أسست (دولوريس) أكاديمية للتدريب (عن بعد) على هذه الجلسات عنوانها البريدي في الولايات المتحدة …
File, posted without a caption
١٨ سببًا يجعل علم التَّنجيم هراء مقال من ترجمة البيضاء، للقراءة: https://albaydha.sa/articales/single/158?0=6
File, posted without a caption
تقنية «الآكسس بارز»، طب بديل أم طائفة من غسيل الأدمغة؟ مقال من ترجمة البيضاء، للقراءة: https://albaydha.sa/articales/single/157?0=6
#طاقة_البلورات #ممارسات_الطاقة #فلسفة_الوعي رقم | ح / ٢ / ٣٢ تاريخ | ٢٧ / ١ / ١٤٤٨ هـ • السؤال: مجموعة بطاقات تحتوي على 40 بطاقة ملونة بالكامل برسومات دقيقة للبلورات والحيوانات والنباتات والرموز القديمة كل بطاقة لها دليل بلوري خاص بها .. الغرض منها: - العمل مع حكمة البلورات والاتحاد مع الوعي الأعلى - إيقاظ الرحلة الروحية وإلهام التمكين الذاتي - التواصل مع الذات العليا وتردداتها المقدسة وذلك من خلال: - رسائل روحية…
#الكتابة_الواعية #فلسفة_الوعي #قانون_الجذب رقم | ع / ١ / ٤١ تاريخ | ٢٠ / ١ / ١٤٤٨ هـ •السؤال: ما رأيكم بالمقطع المرسل الذي تقرر فيه المتحدثة أن القَسَم الوارد في سورة القلم: {ن ۚ وَالْقَلَمِ وَمَا يَسْطُرُونَ} يدل على أن الكتابة تحقيق الأهداف، وأن الوسائل الحديثة لا تقوم مقام التسطير بالقلم والورقة، وتستدل على ذلك بأن كثيرًا ممن مارسوا الكتابة تحققت رغباتهم. كما تصف الكتابة بأنها أشبه بالسحر لما يترتب عليها من إدرا…
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @ask_albaydha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@ask_albaydha edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 2 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 2 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@thuryaalsaif · 3,0784 postsفلسفات شرقية
@Easternphilosophies · 5,5533 postsكهنة الطاقة venus
@venusast0 · 2943 postsنور الوعي
@nooralwaai · 42 postsقناة قانون الجدب
@thesuperlie · 1,5262 posts📡الطــــاقـــــة الكـــونـــيــــة📡
@ReikiFacts · 5,6851 postالفكر العقدي الوافد ومنهجية التعامل معه
@fowz_3k · 12,7901 postالإستشفاء بالقرآن
@omazzam1439 · 8331 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@ReikiFacts · 5,6854 posts| قناة البيضاء |
@albaydha · 21,0022 postsنور الوعي
@nooralwaai · 42 postsقناة قانون الجدب
@thesuperlie · 1,5262 postsقناة د.ثرياالسيف
@thuryaalsaif · 3,0782 postsكهنة الطاقة venus
@venusast0 · 2942 posts(كشف الدجالين، حقائق وتجارب) 🤍
@Amalkilil · 3541 post📚إعلانات الدورات الدينية📚
@course_announcements · 10,7911 postفلسفات شرقية
@Easternphilosophies · 5,5531 postالفكر العقدي الوافد ومنهجية التعامل معه
@fowz_3k · 12,7901 postمرام أبومخ المَقْدِسِيَّة
@mramabumukh · 8631 postالإستشفاء بالقرآن
@omazzam1439 · 8331 postدعوة للجنة
@r8ouii · 1,3441 postقنوات دينية 🕋
@Religious_channels · 1,4991 postرُدهَـة نُور وأَصـل سُرور ✨
@rodhah · 9021 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@albaydha · 21,002#1
@Easternphilosophies · 5,553#2
@thuryaalsaif · 3,078#3
@katib_kitab · 6,790#4
@fowz_3k · 12,790#5
@a1n2m3f4j5 · 1,268#6
@Ebtehal444 · 1,132#7
@haqaiq_new_age · 3,939#8
@Dralderes · 37,033#9
@touq_in · 1,243#10
@wareth222 · 7,054#11
@t_hssan · 35,030#12
@dardashaat · 20,995#13
@ibntaymiiya · 6,823#14
@monsit · 35,331#15
@Somoalhadaf · 538#16
@thfezat1442 · 2,018#17
@resalaiu · 15,371#18
@xthelight · 758#19
@monaqasht · 13,084#20
@alwaseela1 · 6,232#21
@alosyme · 60,771#22
@so_alobodi · 20,003#23
@obaid_dh · 12,700#24
@dr_alghfaily · 7,958#25
@daleeluki · 11,503#26
@https3E · 11,561#27
@tashweeqatquran · 44,443#28
@Islamic_faith3 · 15,414#29
@h_alarwan · 17,475#30
@salafcenter · 8,997#31
@ybomar · 13,336#32
@Rafed111 · 94,562#33
@Hanaa577 · 29,682#34
@Algoayme · 44,732#35
@dralhoshan · 8,089#36
@taabeer1 · 9,681#37
@ybh_100 · 94,777#38
@D_R1122 · 6,750#39
@rwasimgirls · 4,767#40
@mutlaqaljasser · 21,805#41
@AlaykomSunnati · 77,925#42
@master12121 · 3,530#43
@reemalsehli · 1,216#44
@almogayeree2 · 9,975#45
@alshri3ah · 3,868#46
@baakhdar3 · 3,496#47
@bahethat1 · 6,484#48
@moodclinic_training · 5,797#49
@Erth_n · 10,367#50
@makanyworld · 188,208#51
@monsit2 · 9,316#52
@IFaisal_Turki · 14,399#53
@ayma2345 · 10,203#54
@bilgasem · 25,035#55
@alsayed_ah · 517,033#56
@lkhojah · 1,906#57
@sutanalomairi · 37,469#58
@ReikiApplications · 2,881#59
@nassermuteb · 7,202#60
@i_Sarab4 · 21,728#61
@assdais · 23,387#62
@dr_alsaady · 13,635#63
@ibrahim_almdehesh · 22,852#64
@Sha6eAlraghad · 3,799#65
@tadabr2 · 31,147#66
@saadalkhthlan · 35,845#67
@pworddcs · 15,727#68
@troos_Arwa · 10,270#69
@fhashmy · 5,601#70
@drasatolya · 73,044#71
@AhmadNalSwailem · 18,198#72
@alkhalil_1 · 34,819#73
@qamarher · 6,615#74
@Abd3llhhh · 25,555#75
@abdulaziz_alshathri · 13,419#76
@tafseer_als · 1,707#77
@aalwhebey · 26,567#78
@DSDazzahrani · 12,178#79
@qrajrd · 10,946#80
@ktbibnalqaim · 87,161#81
@at6MT · 18,259#82
@MishrefAqidah · 35,277#83
@aerfanalruooh · 38,661#84
@alkulife · 49,568#85
@shbarrak · 11,538#86
@rema40 · 1,221#87
@fegh_alnafs · 15,493#88
@fayz_zhr · 15,153#89
@abdulazizatarefe · 59,119#90
@algran1 · 77,955#91
@Feminism4321 · 5,604#92
@ayedh1 · 16,150#93
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@badrih06y · 22,253
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 21 September 2026
@emtdad3 · 23,276
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“| اسأل البيضاء |” (@ask_albaydha), 33,080 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ask_albaydha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.