Channel
@aalwhebey
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
26,359subscribers
+209 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001109008115 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aalwhebey |
| Description | المدونة: https://aalwhebey.com/ |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 31 August 2019— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 22 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aalwhebey |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 26,359 | +22 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 26,337 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 26,336 | +9 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 26,327 | +7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 26,320 | +4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 09:24 | 26,316 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 21:36 | 26,318 | +3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 26,315 | +20 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 26,295 | +16 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 26,279 | +20 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 26,259 | +8 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:54 | 26,251 | +7 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 26,244 | +9 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:36 | 26,235 | +4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:32 | 26,231 | +10 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 26,221 | +12 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:11 | 26,209 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:51 | 26,212 | +9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:32 | 26,203 | +17 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:30 | 26,186 | first reading |
29 posts held, back to 21 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 29 (21 June 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 124,520 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Aug 2026, 08:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
وَلَا تَجْزَعْ فَإِنْ أَعْسَرْتَ يَوْمًا فَقَدْ أَيْسَرْتَ فِي الدَّهْرِ الطَّوِيلِ وَلَا تَظْنُنْ بِرَبِّكَ ظَنَّ سَوْءٍ فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ أَوْلَى بِالْجَمِيلِ فَإِنَّ الْعُسْرَ يَتْبَعُهُ يَسَارٌ وَقَوْلُ اللَّهِ أَصْدَقُ كُلِّ قِيلِ فَكَمْ مِنْ مُؤْمِنٍ قَدْ جَاعَ يَوْمًا سَيُرْوَى مِنْ رَحِيقِ السَّلْسَبِيلِ
«رُبَّ والدٍ يكون السّفهُ صفتَهُ، وله الولدُ الحليمُ، فيعتُو عليه والدُه بسفهِهِ، فلا يُقبلُ منه، ولا يُطاعُ فيه، ويُزجَرُ عنه حتَّى يَكُفَّ أذاه». علي بن محمد القابسي القيرواني المالكي (403هـ)
أبو محمد عبد الحق بن غالب بن عطية الأندلسي (ت ٥٤٢هـ)
https://m.youtube.com/watch?si=_hmj3E9-w-jU-vG2&v=r8MFysnT1QY&feature=youtu.be
عن ابن عمر رضي الله عنه، عن رسول الله ﷺ قال: «إنّ لله تَعَالَى أقْوامًا يَخْتَصُّهُمْ بالنِّعَمِ لِمَنافِعِ العِبادِ ويُقِرُّها فيهِمْ مَا بَذَلُوها، فَإِذا مَنَعُوها نَزَعَها مِنْهُمْ فَحَوَّلها إِلَى غَيْرِهِمْ». أخرجه الطبراني والبيهقي، وحسّنه بعضهم. يقول محمد بن إسماعيل الصنعاني (ت١١٨٢ هـ): «{إنّ لله تَعَالَى أقْوامًا يَخْتَصُّهُمْ بالنِّعَمِ} [أي:] من نعمة المال، أو الجاه أو العلم، ولا تنحصر نعمة الله… {فَحَو…
ابن رجب
http://aalwhebey.com/2026/08/16/%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%aa%d9%81%d9%83%d9%8a%d8%b1-%d8%a8%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%82%d9%84%d9%85/
«كلمة دين (Religion) ترجع في أصلها اللاتيني إلى الفعل (Religare) (بالفرنسية Relier)، أي ربط؛ فلاحظ معي هنا كيف أن اللغة اللاتينية تحدد مفهوم الدين، ليس بالماهية، بل بالوظيفة فقط، أو أنها جعلت وظيفة الدين ماهية له. حيث إن الدلالة اللغوية تختزل الدين إلى مجرد رابط بين الآحاد والجماعات، وعامل من عوامل التماسك المجتمعي. ولا يجب أن يُفهم من هذا أنني أنكر هذه القدرة التوحيدية والتأليفية التي يحملها الدين، ويحققها بين معتن…
عن أبي هريرة عن النبي ﷺ: (كلمتان خفيفتان على اللسان ثقيلتان في الميزان: سبحان الله وبحمده، سبحان الله العظيم): «قوله: (خفيفتان على اللسان)، أي من حيث النطق، ومن حيث اتساق الحروف؛ فإن الحروف من النون إلى الهمزة، ومن الهاء إلى الواو وإلى السين، وإلى اللام الساكنة سهل؛ لأنه يتناسب في المخارج ويتقارب، بخلاف خروجك من صاد إلى كاف، أو خروجك من كاف إلى جيم، أو من باء إلى زاي، فإن هاتين الكلمتين نزيهة من التكلّف». ابن هبيرة …
«إذا كنت لا تهتم إلا بالقضايا العلمية المثيرة للجدل، فسوف ينتهي بك الأمر ورأسك محشوٌّ بالكثير من الهراء! تتصور وسائل الإعلام أن ما يستحق التغطية هو فقط أحدث ما وصلت إليه العلوم… وعندما تصبح أي فكرة علمًا راسخًا، فإنها لا تعود خبرًا عاجلًا. أما العلوم «الجديرة بالنشر» فغالبًا ما تكون مبنية على أدلة شديدة الهشاشة، وقد تكون خاطئة في نصف الحالات؛ لأنها لو لم تكن واقعة عند أبعد أطراف الجبهة العلمية، لما كانت خبرًا عاجلًا…
تدفع وسائل التواصل الاجتماعي الناس إلى مزيد من هذا الجمود. وهو نوع من التشوه المعرفي، وغريزة دفاعية توهمنا بأننا، إذا التزمنا القواعد وأحكمنا السيطرة على كل متغير، فلن نتعرض للأذى. لكن لا توجد وصفة مضمونة للفوز. يمكنك أن تلوي نفسك حتى تتحول إلى الصورة المثالية المصطنعة، وأن تبني حصنًا من المال والمكانة والاكتفاء الذاتي، لكنك لا تستطيع أن تنزع عن الحب احتمال الألم. وكل هذا يبعدنا عن غريزة إنسانية أساسية: تكوين الأسرة…
«يبدو أن فتيات الجيل زد «مواليد ما بين عامي 1997 و2012» أصبحن أكثر استياءً من النسوية المؤسسية، فقد أظهر استطلاع حديث في الولايات المتحدة أن 47٪ في المئة من نساء هذا الجيل يفضّلن أن يكنّ «متزوجات بسعادة، ولديهن أطفال ووظيفة عادية» على أن يكنّ «ناجحات جدًا ومستقلات ومشهورات، حتى لو كنّ عازبات»، أو «في علاقة عاطفية، بلا أطفال، مع مهنة إبداعية وكثير من السفر». ووفقًا لتقرير حديث آخر، أصبحت النساء، للمرة الأولى منذ عقد،…
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @aalwhebey. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 5,016 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 44 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“عبدالله الوهيبي” (@aalwhebey), 26,359 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aalwhebey.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.