Channel
@alnatheerr
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
32,433subscribers
+205 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001386749593 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alnatheerr |
| Created | 20 July 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alnatheerr |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 09:56 | 32,433 | -7 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 16:39 | 32,440 | +25 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:05 | 32,415 | -5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:24 | 32,420 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:15 | 32,422 | +9 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:37 | 32,413 | +5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:24 | 32,408 | +19 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:43 | 32,389 | +5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:13 | 32,384 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 32,386 | +18 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:48 | 32,368 | +12 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:24 | 32,356 | +26 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 32,330 | +12 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:19 | 32,318 | +6 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:06 | 32,312 | +6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 32,306 | +5 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:24 | 32,301 | +14 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:56 | 32,287 | -3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 32,290 | +7 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 32,283 | first reading |
87 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 87 (24 July 2026 – 8 September 2026) |
| Views total | 243,861 |
| Reactions total | 3,549 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Sept 2026, 01:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4,937 reactions across 85 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3,536 | 71.6% | |
| 😢 | 766 | 15.5% | |
| 👍 | 140 | 2.84% | |
| ❤🔥 | 107 | 2.17% | |
| 😁 | 105 | 2.13% | |
| 💔 | 80 | 1.62% | |
| 🔥 | 53 | 1.07% | |
| 🕊 | 27 | 0.547% | |
| 😍 | 25 | 0.506% | |
| 💯 | 20 | 0.405% | |
| 👏 | 19 | 0.385% | |
| 🥴 | 19 | 0.385% | |
| 👌 | 16 | 0.324% | |
| 🤔 | 9 | 0.182% | |
| 😱 | 6 | 0.122% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 0.101% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 0.061% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.02% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 87 of the 87 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,081 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 87 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 8 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
وفي حديث" أم زرع" من الفوائد: حُسن عِشرة الرجل مع أهله، وتأنيسُهن، واستحبابُ مُحادثتهن بما لا إثم فيه، وقد كان مالك - رحمه الله- يقول: في ذلك مَرضاةٌ لربّك، ومَحبةٌ في أهلك، ومَثراةٌ في مالِكَ ومَنسأةٌ في أجلِك، قال: وقد بلغني ذلك عن بعض أصحاب النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم. وكان مالكٌ - رحمه الله- من أحسنِ الناس خُلقا مع أهله وولدِه، وكان يقول: يجب على الإنسان أن يَتحبَّب إلى أهل داره حتى يكون أحَبَّ الناس إليهم. - القا…
❤39👏1🔥1🤩1
" مَن لم يُقبِل على الله بملاطَفات الإحسان، قِيدَ إليه بسلاسل الامتحان ". - الحكم العطائية- اللهم اجعلنا عبيد إحسان لا عبيد امتحان.
❤58😢10❤🔥1💯1
تفسير العلّامة جمال الدّين القاسميّ لبعض بواعث (المِحنة). من كتابه (تاريخ الجَهميّة والمعتزِلة). #تاريخ
❤5🤔4👍2
قد وردَت عن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم آثارٌ كثيرة في زُهده صلى الله عليه وسلم وجُوعه وإعراضِه عن الدنيا، ككونه كان يربط حجًرا على بطنه من الجوع، وكونه لا يُوقَد في بيته نار ثلاثة أيام، ونحو ذلك من الآثار الصحيحة. وقد ذَكر العلماء لهذا الحال الشريف حِكمًا عظيمة، مثل أن التقلُّل من حظوظ الجسد يُقوّي هِمّة الروح كما بيَّنه الحكماء في مَحلِّه، ومثل أن هذا كان لمواساة أصحابه من أهل الفقر والحاجة، حتى إذا رأوا رسول الله صل…
❤42👍3👏2😢1
والله حصل معي موقف قريب من هذا، لكن مش مع والدتي ربنا يبارك في عمرها، وإنما كنت في مكان ما، وكان يوجد رجل بسيط جدا يتكلم معي في موضوع، وبعدين فجأة لقيته بيسألني: هو أنت مذهبك إيه ؟ قلت له: أنا مالكي. قال لي: يا أخي، مفيش في الإسلام مذاهب، النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم قال: ستفترق أمتي على ثلاث وسبعين طائفة، كلها في النار، إلا واحدة. قلت له: اللي تشوفه يا عم الحاج.
😁46😢8👍4💯2
"وقد ذَكر في المعيار عن ابن لُبٍّ أن ما ارتكبه الناس وتقادَم في عُرفهم وجرى به عملهم ينبغي أن يُلتمس له وجه شرعي ما أمكن على خلاف أو وفاق، إذ لا يلزم ارتباط العمل بمذهب معين ولا بمشهور من قول قائل اهـ".
❤18
البهجة للتسولي ورحم الله أهل العلم العقلاء الرحماء بعباد الله https://t.me/Rwaq_manhaji
❤11👌3
«وفائدة طلب الوسيلة مع رجائه صلى الله عليه وسلم لها- ورجاؤه لا يخيب- : إعلامنا بأن الله تعالى لا يجب عليه لأحد من خلقه شيءٌ، وأن له أن يفعل بمن شاء- وإن جلت مرتبته- ما شاء؛ ففي ذلك عظيم إظهار تواضعه وخوفه المقتضي لمزيد رقيه وعلوه، فعلم أن فيه فائدة تعود عليه صلى الله عليه وسلم وعلينا، خلافًا لمن حصر الفائدة في الثاني». .. ابن حجر الهيتمي رحمه الله. قلت: وهذا مقام من مقامات عبوديته صلى الله عليه وسلم، فلا أحد أحق ب…
❤31❤🔥1👍1
والقافة: هم الذين يَقْفُون أثر الأقدام والحوافر والأخفاف، ويتبعونه فيستدلون به على صاحبه ويعرفون من هو. والقيافة على ضربين: -قيافة الأثر: وهي هذه، وكانت في قوم من العرب أرضُهم ذاتُ رمل، إذا هرب منهم هارب، أو دخل عليهم سارق، تبعوا أثر قدمه حتى يظفروا به. - وقيافة البَشر: وهي الاستدلال بصفات الأعضاء على الإنسان، فيلحق بمن يلحق به، وكانت مختصة ببني مُدلج. وفي السيرة الحلبية: استأجر المشركون رجلاً يقال له علقمة بن كُ…
❤37👏2🔥2👌1
من خلال ما شاهدتُّ في دوائر معارفي وأقاربي وما خالطتُّ من المعارف والأصدقاء رأيتُ أن النساء أحرص على صلة الأرحام من الرجال، وأعرَفُ منهم بدرجات القُربى وأقوَم منهم بواجباتها، ولا تكاد تأخذهن شواغل الأيام ومتاعبها وهمومها عن القيام بها، وفي مناسبةٍ كالوفاة أو العُرس تتكلف الواحدة منهن السفر وقطعَ المسافات الطويلة لمشاركة أقاربها ولا يصدها عن ذلك شيء، في حين أن الرجل يعتذر عن عدم الحضور ويتعلل بأدنى عارض، وقد لا يعبأ أ…
❤41👍6👌4
هل تعتقد أن كثرة الأبناء هي الضمان الوحيد ضد الوحدة في الشيخوخة؟ المثير أن الأمر قد لا يتعلق بعدد الأبناء بقدر ما يتعلق بوجود ابنة! دراسة بريطانية مهمة من ضمن دراسة ELSA (شملت حوالي 7000 شخص فوق الستين) كشفت أن: وجود أبناء يزيد فرص التواصل الاجتماعي الأسبوعي مقارنةً بمن لا أبناء لهم. لكن زيادة عدد الأبناء لم تُحدث فرقًا كبيرًا إضافيًا. المفاجأة الأكبر: وجود ابنة واحدة على الأقل كان أهم بكثير من عدد الأبناء نفسه …
❤38👍6💯4💔1
فإن قلت: ما الحكمة في هِجرته عليه الصلاة والسلام إلى المدينة، وإقامته بها إلى أن انتقل بها إلى ربه عز وجل؟! أُجِيب: بأن حكمة الله تعالى، قد اقتضت أنه -عليه الصلاة والسلام- تتشرَّف به الأشياء، لا أنه يتشرَّف بها، فلو بقيَ في مكة إلى انتقاله إلى ربه، لكان قد يُتوهَّم أنه قد تشَرَّف بمكة؛ إذ إنَّ شرَفها قد سبَق بالخليل وإسماعيل - عليهما الصلاة والسلام- فأراد الله أن يُظهر شرَفه - عليه السلام - بأمرِه بالهجرة إلى المدي…
❤🔥33❤30
Showing the 12 most recent of 87 posts we hold for @alnatheerr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@alnatheerr edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 92 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“أفكار وأسْمَار” (@alnatheerr), 32,433 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alnatheerr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.