Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for أيوب الجهني

Channel

أيوب الجهني

@ayuobh

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,693subscribers

+317 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001315022853
TypeChannel
Username@ayuobh
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held55
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ayuobh

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

16,37616,69916,537.56 August 2026 — 16,376 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,387 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,395 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,399 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,429 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,425 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,429 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,434 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,432 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,434 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,490 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,506 subscribers21 August 2026 — 16,505 subscribers22 August 2026 — 16,504 subscribers24 August 2026 — 16,516 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,512 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,513 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,511 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,512 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,526 subscribers31 August 2026 — 16,531 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,538 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,542 subscribers3 September 2026 — 16,548 subscribers5 September 2026 — 16,555 subscribers9 September 2026 — 16,557 subscribers11 September 2026 — 16,554 subscribers13 September 2026 — 16,558 subscribers15 September 2026 — 16,564 subscribers17 September 2026 — 16,566 subscribers25 September 2026 — 16,610 subscribers4 October 2026 — 16,634 subscribers8 October 2026 — 16,643 subscribers12 October 2026 — 16,652 subscribers14 October 2026 — 16,650 subscribers15 October 2026 — 16,647 subscribers16 October 2026 — 16,653 subscribers17 October 2026 — 16,658 subscribers18 October 2026 — 16,659 subscribers19 October 2026 — 16,663 subscribers20 October 2026 — 16,665 subscribers21 October 2026 — 16,671 subscribers23 October 2026 — 16,681 subscribers24 October 2026 — 16,673 subscribers25 October 2026 — 16,674 subscribers26 October 2026 — 16,670 subscribers27 October 2026 — 16,680 subscribers28 October 2026 — 16,682 subscribers29 October 2026 — 16,692 subscribers30 October 2026 — 16,699 subscribers1 November 2026 — 16,695 subscribers3 November 2026 — 16,698 subscribers4 November 2026 — 16,697 subscribers5 November 2026 — 16,695 subscribers6 November 2026 — 16,693 subscribers16,6936 August 20266 November 2026
55 measurements spanning 92 days, net +317. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,328–16,747 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 55
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 19:1816,693-2
5 Nov 2026, 17:4516,695-2
4 Nov 2026, 19:0716,697-1
3 Nov 2026, 15:2716,698+3
1 Nov 2026, 11:4716,695-4
30 Oct 2026, 13:4116,699+7
29 Oct 2026, 10:2816,692+10
28 Oct 2026, 06:5716,682+2
27 Oct 2026, 07:5016,680+10
26 Oct 2026, 04:5716,670-4
25 Oct 2026, 02:3516,674+1
24 Oct 2026, 04:1616,673-8
23 Oct 2026, 00:4816,681+10
21 Oct 2026, 22:5516,671+6
20 Oct 2026, 14:5016,665+2
19 Oct 2026, 15:4516,663+4
18 Oct 2026, 16:3116,659+1
17 Oct 2026, 17:1016,658+5
16 Oct 2026, 14:4516,653+6
15 Oct 2026, 13:4616,647first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 9 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.9%
avg views ÷ 16,693 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,320
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 October 2026
Posts held31 (9 May 2026 – 28 October 2026)
Views total9,950
Reactions total325
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 17:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

4,220 reactions across 31 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,95169.9%
😢47711.3%
👍44810.6%
🔥2004.74%
😁942.23%
🤩420.995%
😱80.19%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,220 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2026 to 28 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 31 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ayuobh. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 31 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 May 2026 to 28 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (66.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

28 Oct 2026, 20:38 UTC≈2,370 views107 reactionsread 6 November 2026

#نفثة أيام أنسي التي توَلَّت ليس لها عائضٌ سِواها ​جادت بصَفْوٍ، وحين تَمَّت جَذَّت يمينُ النوى عُراها ​دَعَوتُها ثم لم تُجِبْني ولَبَّتِ البينَ إذ دعاها ​فليتها حينما توَلَّت وَلَّى لظاها وظَلَّ ماها

❤58😢39🔥5👍3🤩2

Signed أيوب الجهني

28 Oct 2026, 13:53 UTC≈3,410 views79 reactionsread 6 November 2026

«والكتاب يُتصفَّح أكثرَ من الخطاب، لأن الكاتب مُتخيِّر، والمخاطِب مُشافِهٌ مُضْطَرٌّ. ومَن يَرِدُ عليه كتابُك ليس يعلم أسرعتَ فيه أم أبطأتَ؟ وإنما ينظر أصبتَ أم أخطأت، أو أحسنت أم أسأت؟ فإبطاؤك غير قادح في إصابتك، كما أنَّ إسراعك غير مُعَفٍّ على غلطك». أدب الكتاب للصولي ٢١٨

❤67👍12

Signed أيوب الجهني

25 Oct 2026, 21:35 UTC≈4,170 views139 reactionsread 6 November 2026

من ملك آلة التحرير والتحقيق ثم ركن إلى التقليد، فقد رضي بأدنى المنزلتين، ولم يؤدِّ حقَّ العلم، ولا شُكرَ الهِبَة. خالف السهيلي النحويين في مسألةٍ ما، وحرر ذلك تحريرًا بديعا على عادته، ونصب لذلك البراهين، وبسط له الدلائل، ثم ختم ذلك بقوله: «وكشْفُ القِناع عن الحقائق أولى من لزوم حضيض التقليد». والعلم لا يقوم بحقه إلا جسور وقور، شجاع في رأيه، حذِرٌ في قوله.

❤103👍20🔥16

Signed أيوب الجهني

7 Oct 2026, 17:36 UTC≈5,700 views89 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026

#نفثة حتَّامَ تَرْجِعُ قولًا لا غَناءَ بهِ! إنَّ الغَناء بأفعال المَصاليتِ أن يَّنطِقَ الحدُّ نُطْقًا لا يُلَعْثِمهُ دمٌ، ولا ينحني إلا على لِيتِ وأن يقومَ خطيبًا فوق كَفِّ فَتًى ولا يعودَ بفعلٍ غيرِ منعوتِ وأن يُّدافِعَ -قبلَ الثأرِ- مِيتَتَهُ فإن يَّنَلْ ثأرَهُ نادى بها: إيتي وأن يقولَ لنفسٍ غيرِ مُرْخَصَةٍ: تِيهي عليهم، وإن لَّا تُكْرَمي مُوتي فِعْلَ الأُلَى حين ضلَّ الموتُ ساحتَهم ساروا إلى الموت فجرًا سَيْ…

❤47🔥37👍4🤩1

Signed أيوب الجهني

22 Sept 2026, 06:42 UTC≈9,570 views247 reactionsread 6 November 2026

{لا يكلف الله نفسا إلا وسعها}. فما يجده العبد من مشقة في عبادة، أو طلب علم، أو سعيٍ في معاش= فإنها مشقة مقدور عليها في الأصل. وما جاوز ذلك فمشقة من عند نفسه، إما بنقص في تأديتها، وإما بتكلف زيادة لا تلزمه. {ولو شاء الله لأعنتَكم}، أي: لشقّ عليكم، {إن الله عزيز حكيم}. فمن استحضر حكمته صغُر في عينه ما كبُر في وهمه، وقصَدَ في مشيه غير متعدٍّ، وقنع بوسعه غير متكلِّف.

❤208👍33🔥6

Signed أيوب الجهني

4 Sept 2026, 19:20 UTC≈12,900 views180 reactionsread 6 November 2026

إنَّ من العلم ضروبًا لا تصلح لكل أحد، وحقُّها أن يُضَنَّ بها على غير أهلها، وأن يجتهد مؤدّيها ألا تصل إلى سواهم، فإنها إن بلغتْ مَن ليس مِن أهلها فلعلها أن تضرَّه ولا تنفعَه، وأن يضرَّ بها أقوامًا مثلَه، فيصير العلم وبالًا، ويعود الجهل لأمثالهم أنفع في حقهم من العلم! وهذا نفسُه ضرْبٌ من العلم محتاج إلى معرفة، فيُعرف أهل العلم من دخلائه، ومراتب المتعلمين، وصلاح عقولهم ونفوسهم، وتفقُّد المحالِّ القابلة للعلم عندهم، وإ…

😁86❤79👍14🤩1

Signed أيوب الجهني

31 Aug 2026, 20:12 UTC≈11,000 views136 reactionsread 6 November 2026

#نفثة لا يُعجِبَنَّك أنْ تَرى جَلَدي إنَّ التجلُّدَ أوَّلُ العَطَبِ . إنْ أَبْدُ ذا جَلَدٍ فذاك بما يَقتاتُ مِن روحي ومِن عَصَبي فإذا رأيتَ تجلُّدي فأنا أَوْلى من الإعجابِ بالحَدَبِ

😢56❤40👍28🔥6😱5🤩1

Signed أيوب الجهني

28 Aug 2026, 17:53 UTC≈9,350 views152 reactionsread 6 November 2026

#نفثة تُنازعُهُ نفسانِ: نفسٌ نَصيحةٌ وأُخرى له الويلاتُ إمّا أطاعَها أقام زمانًا يحرس النفسَ بالتُّقى وفي لحظةٍ غرَّتْهُ حتى أضاعَها

😢101❤39👍6🔥5🤩1

Signed أيوب الجهني

17 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTC≈19,100 views256 reactionsread 6 November 2026

لم أسترح يومًا إلى القراءة من غير الكتاب المطبوع، وما زلت إن احتجت إلى كتاب عانيت في تَطْلابِه حتى أناله، فلا أجد نفسي تقنع أن القراءة من الكتاب المصوّر تنفعها! وليس ذلك لعلةٍ في الكتاب المصور من مثل تعب العين أو عسر التقليب، بل لِما يحدثه من قطيعة مع الكتاب الورقي، وهو شيء لا أجد نفسي تقبله، فهو الأصل في القراءة والتعلم ما دام في الدنيا شيء اسمه كتاب. لكني وجدت عناءًا في سفري وتنقلي وساعات خروجي إذا طالتْ، فإما أن…

❤197👍41🔥7😢6🤩5

Signed أيوب الجهني

15 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC≈9,420 views102 reactionsread 6 November 2026

وقيل: عملُ الشعرِ على الحاذق به أشدُّ مِن نقْلِ الصخر. ويقال: إن الشعر كالبحر؛ أهْوَنُ ما يكون على الجاهلِ، أهْوَلُ ما يكون على العالِم. وأتْعَبُ أصحابِه قلبًا مَن عرفه حقَّ معرفته. العمدة لابن رشيق.

❤87👍11🔥4

Signed أيوب الجهني

9 Aug 2026, 21:02 UTC≈19,500 views237 reactionsread 6 November 2026

النفس طَرِفَة ملولة، تُخادَع مخادعةَ الصبي لِمَا يُصلحه. فأطمعْها ولا تُطِعْها، وأطعمْها ولا تُشبِعْها، وأَجِعْها ولا تُسْغِبْها، وأعطِها مرة، وامنعْها مرَّات، ولن تستقيم لك، فعلى الميل جُبِلتْ. وقِوام الأمر المجاهدة.

❤171👍48😢14🔥4

Signed أيوب الجهني

29 Jul 2026, 21:37 UTC≈14,400 views203 reactions3 Starsread 6 November 2026

#نفثة أرادَ امرؤٌ عَيْبي، ولم أكُ مُذنِبًا إليهِ، ولكن ضاقَ بالغِلِّ حامِلُهْ يَروحُ ويَغْدو بين جَنبَيهِ غَيْظُهُ ولا بُدَّ يومًا أنْ تُنيخَ رَواحِلُهْ ولم أرَ مِثلَ الحِقْدِ أسْرعَ مَغْرَمًا أواخِرُه مَشْئومةٌ وأوائِلُهْ أرادَ لِكَيْما يَزْدَريني مُغَمَّرٌ فأبْلَجَ حَقِّي إذ تَلَجْلَجَ باطِلُهْ أيَغْمِزُني مَن لَّو غَمَزْتُ قَناتَهُ تَكَسَّرَ منه كَعْبُه ومَفاصِلُهْ! لِكُلِّ حَليمٍ شُعْبةٌ جاهِلِيّةٌ فتَحْمَر…

❤123🔥38👍23🤩9😁5😢3😱2

Signed أيوب الجهني

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @ayuobh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @ayuobh as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
3 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 months
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

حذيفة العرجي
@el_arje · 21,906
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
« قيامة الشعر »
@Alqyamh · 23,800
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 September 2026
مكتبة الأدب العربي
@dewan55 · 30,239
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 September 2026
بلاغةٌ.
@Balaghaton · 53,543
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 24 August 2026
أحمد عبد المنصف
@abdelmonsef · 20,253
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 September 2026
روائع الشعر العربي
@almihklafi · 45,864
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
عِرفان
@aerfanalruooh · 38,744
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 31 August 2026
طبخات الشيف أسومة👩🏻‍🍳
@Chef_asma · 28,193
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 9 September 2026
نايف بن نهار
@nayefbinnahar · 35,726
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 3 September 2026
أفكار وأسْمَار
@alnatheerr · 32,592
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 September 2026
Emad Rashad Osman
@emadrashadosman · 54,860
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 24 August 2026
قناة مَسَار | محمود أبو عادي
@masarchannel · 22,490
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
قناة سليمان بن ناصر العبودي
@so_alobodi · 20,783
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 September 2026
روائع من الأدب العربي
@Rwaea3 · 42,468
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
حُبَابَة•
@Hobaba7 · 61,191
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 August 2026
منصت
@monsit · 35,017
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 2 September 2026
عبدالله الوهيبي
@aalwhebey · 26,923
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 September 2026
أحمد أبو الفتوح
@Afotouhll · 40,230
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 29 August 2026
أحمد سيف
@AhmadSaif_t01 · 34,744
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 3 September 2026
منصت الوحي - الختمة الصوتية للقرآن
@monsit3 · 30,916
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 7 September 2026
برنامج "مُدَّكِر" - القناة العامة
@ModdakerELearn · 49,065
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 26 August 2026
معهد الإمام ابن مالك للتأسيس اللغوي
@IbnMalekAr · 41,886
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
مُسدَّد
@lllmmmlllllll · 22,458
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 September 2026
محمد عبد اللطيف
@MHAbdellatif · 20,670
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 September 2026

This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“أيوب الجهني” (@ayuobh), 16,693 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ayuobh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.