Channel
@manhajiyyat
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,438subscribers
+403 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002116220901 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @manhajiyyat |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/manhajiyyat |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 01:01 | 12,438 | +34 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 23:19 | 12,404 | +30 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 07:39 | 12,374 | +26 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 17:02 | 12,348 | +15 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 17:01 | 12,333 | +12 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 14:55 | 12,321 | +37 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 16:21 | 12,284 | +17 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:34 | 12,267 | +33 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:33 | 12,234 | +11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:28 | 12,223 | +16 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 12,207 | +11 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 12,196 | +28 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:57 | 12,168 | +9 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 12,159 | +5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:57 | 12,154 | +6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:08 | 12,148 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 12,150 | -7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:03 | 12,157 | +14 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 12,143 | +28 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 05:12 | 12,115 | first reading |
118 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 118 (1 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 56,671 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 22:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
ـ « سلسلة المنهجية في طلب العلم » • الموضوع السابع: «اختيار أدوات التعلم»: كيف يختار الطالب: • الشيخ الذي يناسبه. • الكتاب الذي يناسبه. • الدرس الذي يناسبه. • المتن الذي يناسبه للحفظ.. ونحو هذا. وهذا الكلام -في الحقيقة- لا يتوقف ولا يقتصر على الدرس الشفهي الذي يدرسه الطالب على الشيخ مباشرة، وإنما يتناول حتى البرامج العلمية التي يتابعها؛ فمن أراد أن يختار كتاباً علمياً ليدرسه عبر إحدى المؤسسات التعليمية أ…
• الموضوع السابع: «اختيار أدوات التعلم» #المنهجية_في_طلب_العلم. #منهجيات.
متى تقرأ شرحًا ثانيًا على الكتاب ؟ ليس بمجرد الانتهاء من المرور على شرح الكتاب تبدأ في شرح جديد ، بل اقرأ شرحًا ثانيًا عندما يكون له وظيفة جديدة. مثلاً: الشرح الأول: فهم العبارة. الشرح الثاني: حل إشكال. الشرح الثالث: التوسع في الخلاف. هنا أصبحت الكتب تخدم أهدافًا مختلفة. أما أن تقرأ ثلاثة شروح متطابقة، ثم لا تعرف أيها بقي في ذهنك، فهذا غالبًا استهلاك للوقت أكثر من كونه بناءً للعلم. والقاعدة: لا تعالج الدقائق قب…
كيف تختار الشرح المناسب ؟ لا تختَر الشرح لأنه: أشهر. أطول. أكثر تعليقات. أكثر صفحات. يكثر فيه ذكر الخلاف. بل اسأل شيخك : هل يناسب مرحلتي؟ هل يشرح عبارة المتن؟ هل أسلوبه واضح؟ هل يعالج الإشكالات التي أحتاج إليها؟ هل أستطيع إنهاءه والاستفادة منه؟ فالشرح المناسب للطالب المتوسط قد يكون أفضل له من شرح أعظم علمًا لكنه فوق مرحلته .
المستعجل لا يصل.
مظاهر سوءِ التعليمِ: 1- شرحُ كتبِ المبتدئين في مجالسَ متباعدةٍ. 2 - المُكوثُ في مثل (شرح قطر الندى وبل الصدى) فما يحاذيه أو دونه أكثرَ من ثلاثة أشهرٍ. 3- شرحُ الكتابِ على غير مستواه أو غيرِ منهجه؛ كشرح الكافية على منهج الألفية، وشرحِ الألفية على مستوى القطرِ، وشرحِ القطرِ على مستوى اﻵجرومية، والأفظعُ من هذا شرحُ الألفيةِ على مستوى اﻵجرومية. 4- شرحُ النحوِ بالعامية. 5- كثرةُ الاستطرادِ في الدرس، وشرُّ الاستطرادِ ما ك…
لمن يشاهد أكثر من شرح على الكتاب وهنا قاعدة جليلة: "كل دقيقة تقضيها في المراجعة، توفر عليك ساعات من إعادة الشروح."
لا تجعل كثرة الشروح هدفًا؛ اجعلها أدوات لحل الإشكالات وبناء الفهم.
طالب العلم لا يقيس يومه بكثرة ما مر على عينيه وأذنيه من المسائل، وإنما بما استقر في عقله وقلبه وأصبح قادرًا على استعماله.
(لا تجعل الجديد يأكل القديم) اجعل في الأسبوع وقتًا لا تدرس فيه جديدًا، أو تجعل الجديد فيه قليلًا جدًا. وتقوم فيه بـ: مراجعة المحفوظ. مراجعة الكتب السابقة. اختبار المسائل. إعادة بناء الخرائط. معالجة مواطن الضعف. هذا اليوم قد يبدو لك أنه لا يوجد فيه «إنجاز جديد». لكن الحقيقة أنك: تحمي رأس مالك العلمي من الضياع.
الخطة العلمية الناجحة ليست التي تناسب أقوى أيامك، بل التي تستطيع الاستمرار عليها في الأيام العادية. ولهذا: ابنِ خطتك على قدرتك المستقرة، لا على حماسك المؤقت.
من يسأل لا يبقى جاهلاً طويلا.
Showing the 12 most recent of 118 posts we hold for @manhajiyyat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@manhajiyyat edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 53 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مَنهجيّات” (@manhajiyyat), 12,438 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/manhajiyyat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.