Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for زوايا الحواشي (شريف)

Channel

زوايا الحواشي (شريف)

@CornerOfHwashi

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,916subscribers

+532 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001596821618
TypeChannel
Username@CornerOfHwashi
Created12 August 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/CornerOfHwashi

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

16,38416,91616,6506 August 2026 — 16,384 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,390 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,400 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,417 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,423 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,436 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,450 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,455 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,480 subscribers15 August 2026 — 16,506 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,521 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,533 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,548 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,552 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,567 subscribers22 August 2026 — 16,572 subscribers23 August 2026 — 16,596 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,610 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,617 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,619 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,632 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,652 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,660 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,678 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,688 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,702 subscribers3 September 2026 — 16,713 subscribers5 September 2026 — 16,718 subscribers8 September 2026 — 16,777 subscribers11 September 2026 — 16,817 subscribers13 September 2026 — 16,836 subscribers14 September 2026 — 16,857 subscribers16 September 2026 — 16,874 subscribers18 September 2026 — 16,916 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net +532. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,304–16,996 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 22:3916,916+42
16 Sept 2026, 12:2016,874+17
14 Sept 2026, 18:0116,857+21
13 Sept 2026, 05:2016,836+19
11 Sept 2026, 09:1516,817+40
8 Sept 2026, 16:5616,777+59
5 Sept 2026, 07:1716,718+5
3 Sept 2026, 10:0216,713+11
2 Sept 2026, 00:5816,702+14
1 Sept 2026, 00:2416,688+10
30 Aug 2026, 23:5416,678+18
30 Aug 2026, 03:1916,660+8
29 Aug 2026, 01:4816,652+20
28 Aug 2026, 02:0316,632+13
27 Aug 2026, 02:2816,619+2
25 Aug 2026, 23:5916,617+7
25 Aug 2026, 01:4516,610+14
23 Aug 2026, 17:1216,596+24
22 Aug 2026, 00:3716,572+5
20 Aug 2026, 18:0316,567first reading

Engagement

57 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.06%
avg views ÷ 16,916 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,530
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.491%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 57 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held57 (26 July 20263 September 2026)
Views total26,045
Reactions total128
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 18s
Average length
1m 13s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

482 reactions across 54 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
42488.0%
👍336.85%
👌204.15%
🤝51.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 482 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 06:12 UTC331 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026

تعارض بين كلام الأصوليين والفقهاء: يقرر الأصوليين أن ألفاظ الشرع تُحمل على الحقيقة الشرعية فإن لم يمكن تحمل على العرف في ذلك الزمان فإن لم يمكن تحمل على اللغة. فالمصير إلى العرف عندهم مقدَّم على المصير إلى اللغة. ويقرر الفقهاء كثيرًا أن ما لا حدَّ له في الشرع ولا في اللغة يُصار فيه إلى العُرف. فالمصير إلى العرف عندهم مؤخر عن المصير إلى اللغة. فهل هذا تعارض وتناف؟ في الحقيقة لا تعارض، وخلاصة الجواب ما قرره الإمام ت

7👍1

2 Sept 2026, 18:46 UTC634 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026

وبعد، فلما كان غالب أسرار الحق عَلت كلماتُه مصوغةً على ألسن العارفين باللغة الفارسية، وكانت ضوابطها مفاتيحَ الخزائن لمعاني ألفاظهم البهية، لا جرم جرى على ذي الهمة العلية أن يتعلم أولًا قواعد الفرس، وأن يطالع ثانيًا في كتبهم بالقراءة والدرس، حتى وقف على تمام مراداتهم بلا خطأ ولا خطل، وعلم أقصى إشاراتهم بلا زيغ ولا زلل، ورسالتنا هذه متكفلة بتبيان جميع ضوابطها، ومتضمنة بقاطبة قواعدها، سميتها بفاتح الدَّرِية في إثبات قوا

6👍2

2 Sept 2026, 15:51 UTC758 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026

جماعتی که نظر را حرام می‌گویند نظر حرام بکردند و خون خلق حَلال غزال اگر به کمند اوفتد عجب نبود عجب فتادن مردست در کمند غزال -سعدی شیرازی

3

1 Sept 2026, 09:40 UTC942 views11 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @Realism_Scientific

[خاطرة: أنت أنت وليست أفكارك أنت] من الطبيعي أن تعتري الرجل الباحث عن الحقيقة الشكوك؛ فإذا لم يجعل أفكاره ونظرياته جزءً من هويته، لم يجد بأسًا في أن يتراجع خطوة إلى الوراء، فيعيد النظر في المسألة التي عرض له الشك فيها، أو في المبدأ الذي داخله الشك في صحته. فإذا انتهى به النظر إلى تغيير رأيه، لم يخسر شيئًا؛ لأن ذاته شيء، وأفكاره شيء آخر. أما من يجعل أفكاره جزءً من هويته، فإنه يبذل غاية وسعه في دفع الشك عنها؛ لأنه يخ

8👍3

31 Aug 2026, 08:06 UTC≈1,390 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026

بديع جدا جزاكم الله خيرا مولانا

8

31 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC≈1,300 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @annosdiary

لعماد الدين الكاشي شارح المفتاح نظر وجواب لهذا وتوجيه لكلام السكاكي، يقول: [وجوابُه على تقديرِ تسليمِ أن علمَ البيانِ لا يبحثُ عن الدلالات الوضعية هو: أن البحث عن التشبيه من مبادئ علم البيان لا من مسائله. لكن في ذلك الجواب محل نظر؛ وهو أن علم البيان يبحث عن كيفية إيراد المعنى الواحد في طرق مختلفة بالظهور والخفاء، ولا يُشك في أن دلالة المطابقة دلالة ظاهرة في غاية الظهور، ودلالة التضمن أو الالتزام أخفى منها، فينبغي أ

8

31 Aug 2026, 06:08 UTC≈1,290 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026

فالجزئيات مدرَكة بالحواس و لا مدخل في ذلك للحد والرسم، وأما كلياتها كماهية الحرارة والبرودة، فالإحساسات بجزئياتهما كافية في إدراك الماهيتين بحذف المشخصات، و لا حاجة إلى تعريف أصلاً، كيف و أيُّ تعريف يورَدُ هناك كان في إفادة التصور متأخراً عن تلك الإحساسات، كما لا يخفى على من تأمل وأنصف. .. والحق ما تقدم من أن الإحساس بالجزئيات كافٍ في إدراك ماهيات المحسوسات، وأقوى في ذلك مما يمكن أن يذكر لها من التعريفات عند المتأم

6👍2

30 Aug 2026, 17:54 UTC≈1,560 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026

بارك الله في الشيخين الفاضلين ونفع بهما ونشر على يديهما فهم هذه العلوم 🤲🏻 من خيرة المشايخ في مدينة اسطنبول

10👌2

30 Aug 2026, 17:53 UTC≈1,390 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @daralhikma2026Photo

رأسُ العلمِ العلمُ بالله. ومن هذا الفهم تُعلن دار الحكمة دورتها الخريفيَّة الأولى في مفاتيح المعقول: الكلام، والحكمة، والمنطق، والمقولات. أربعةُ نصوصٍ تُدرَّس بالعربيَّة الفصحى، مباشرةً عبر زوم، مع التسجيلات: يانع الأزهار مختصر طوالع الأنوار مبادئ الفلسفة تهذيب مغني الطلاب المقالات في المقولات تبدأ ١٩ أيلول، وتستمر ٢-٣ أشهر بتدريس نجدت حاج علي وعطاء الله ساربالين. للتسجيل: https://daralhikma.institute/ar/cour

9

29 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC≈1,640 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

حجة الإسلام الغزالي

15👍2

28 Aug 2026, 05:28 UTC≈2,010 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026

أوردَ هذا الإشكالَ العلامة الدواني في حواشي التجريد بمثال المخروط المستدير حيث توجد في رأسه نقطة، ولو قسمنا من قاعدته سطحًا لم تنعدم تلك النقطة التي في رأسه مع أن محلها كل المخروط وقد انعدم. وأجاب بمنع بقاء النقطة، كيف والمشائية تدعي بداهة انتفاء الجسم المخروط في هذه الحالة ويلزم انتفاء النقطة قطعًا. وأجاب مير زاهد في حواشي الشواكل بأن محلَّ النقطة في المخروط أولًا وبالذات: هو امتداده في جانب الرأس بحسب الوجود الذ

5

25 Aug 2026, 21:09 UTC≈2,330 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

مرا نه سر نه سامان آفریدند پریشانم پریشان آفریدند پریشان خاطران رفتند در خاک مرا از خاک ایشان آفریدند -بابا طاهر مَن لا يحتار فقد ضرب له بيتًا في أودية الجهل، وهذا هو نعيم الجهل المحسود المذموم في آن واحد. (ليس ترجمة)

7

Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @CornerOfHwashi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

دار الشافعية
@shhawe · 22,608
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 September 2026
کتب مفیدة و نادرة📚
@ktbmfid · 75,679
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 19 August 2026
مكتبة المثنوي
@lmatnawi · 39,711
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
#القناة_العلمية_الشافعية
@saeed_algabry · 23,516
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 18 September 2026
خدمة العلم وأهله
@ilim_hizmeti · 32,443
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 5 September 2026
مكتبة ابن ادريس
@ibnidris · 25,621
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
مكتبة النبراس
@mobliq · 44,770
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
كوة الكتب المصورة - الثبت
@quwaa · 28,382
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
سلم "تصوير الكتب"
@taswkut · 33,337
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
(مكتبة المؤلفات الكاملة)
@maktabat_almualafat_alkamila · 24,610
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 September 2026
مكتبة لسان العرب 📚
@toomanypeaches_tg · 31,221
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 6 September 2026
الكتب النادرة التي ترفع لأول مرة على النت
@kashlanbooks · 23,744
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 17 September 2026
المكتبة اليمنية الشاملة مكتبة المثقف العربي
@alnader412libearyemenbook · 40,662
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
الخزانة الشافعية
@Shkutub · 50,330
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 25 August 2026
📚 مكتبة المذهب الشافعي📚
@maktabat_almadhhab_alshaafieii · 25,534
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
شبكة الفكر
@alfeker · 41,873
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 29 August 2026
Cozmo Books || المكتبة العامة
@cozmoBooks · 43,832
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 August 2026
تراث الشيخ مصطفى إسماعيل ❤️
@tlawaaaaaat · 24,965
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 September 2026
تراث علماء أهل السنة في الصومال
@dhaxalkiiculimada · 25,716
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 September 2026
📚 دار القلم 📚
@darulqalam1 · 29,804
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 September 2026
جَامِعْ تُرَاثِ المِنْشَاوِيْ 📻
@El_minshawy · 108,853
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
عيون الكتب 📚
@OyounAlkotob · 33,820
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 4 September 2026
مكتبة المتنبي ....pdf📚 روايات المكتبة الجامعية بحوث قناة مدرسية كتابة البحوث دراسات
@Almootnbe100 · 87,650
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
كناش الأنظار والفوائد
@tr728 · 22,084
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 September 2026

This channel appears in 70 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“زوايا الحواشي (شريف)” (@CornerOfHwashi), 16,916 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CornerOfHwashi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.