Photo, posted without a caption
Signed عبد الله بن عبد العزيز الـغِــزِّي

Channel
@al_ghizzi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,979subscribers
+123 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001048129509 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @al_ghizzi |
| Description | -للتواصل العلمي: [email protected]. -تويتر: @al_ghizzi -سنابشات: https://www.snapchat.com/add/al_ghizzi -الكلوب هاوس: @al_ghizzi |
| Created | 21 April 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/al_ghizzi |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 22:46 | 7,979 | +5 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 12:27 | 7,974 | -1 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 12:29 | 7,975 | -4 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 09:25 | 7,979 | +5 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 13:39 | 7,974 | +3 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 06:41 | 7,971 | -3 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 10:30 | 7,974 | -1 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 17:41 | 7,975 | +6 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 21:59 | 7,969 | -8 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 20:15 | 7,977 | +4 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 13:21 | 7,973 | +1 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 7,972 | -4 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 00:56 | 7,976 | +3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 02:57 | 7,973 | +6 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 02:36 | 7,967 | +7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:56 | 7,960 | +8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:25 | 7,952 | +6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:53 | 7,946 | -5 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 02:14 | 7,951 | +10 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 10:13 | 7,941 | first reading |
29 posts held, back to 9 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 29 (9 December 2025 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 3,638 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 11:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed عبد الله بن عبد العزيز الـغِــزِّي
كنت من المعتقدين بصحة نسبة كتاب الرد على الزنادقة والجهمية للإمام أحمد، وبعد قراءة هذا البحث ومناقشة مؤلفه مرارا وتكرارا في كثير مما كتبه تزلزل هذا الاعتقاد وزال، وصرت بعده في شكٍّ من نسبة الكتاب للإمام أحمد. لا يخفى عليّ ما كتبه المثبتون للنسبة من دلائل، وما كتبه النافون للنسبة من دلائل قبل مطالعة هذا البحث، ولكن مناقشة الباحث الصديق عبدالله الغزي للمثبتين كانت مختلفة جدا عمن سبقه، ومعتمدة على جوانب متعددة ومؤثرة ت…
Signed عبد الله بن عبد العزيز الـغِــزِّي
https://t.me/al_ghizzi/2077
Signed عبد الله بن عبد العزيز الـغِــزِّي
من المقدمات الأساسية التي فاتني التنبيه عليها في هذا اللقاء قضية هل ستتغير عقيدة أحمد بن حنبل عندما نبطل نسبة «الرد على الزنادقة والجهمية» له؟ لأنه يلاحظ في بعض التعليقات على اللقاء كيف يصور الأمر على أن نفي نسبة هذا الكتاب له يخدم طوائف مخالفة لأهل الحديث؛ مثل الأشعرية! هذه القضية عقدت لها فقرة كاملة في كتابي الجديد (ص180-184). وأقول هنا اختصارًا: هذا الكتاب المنسوب لابن حنبل يتضمن سبعة عقائد عامة، وهي: - أن القرآ…
Signed عبد الله بن عبد العزيز الـغِــزِّي
أجرى الصديق يوسف بن عمر -مشكورًا- لقاء مطولًا معي في سنابه عن كتابي الجديد «نسبة النصوص التاريخية لغير مؤلفيها». https://youtu.be/MAvTH1rH39M?si=6QxtLNgsPdhw3NEj مشاهدة ممتعة. https://t.me/al_ghizzi/2094
Signed عبد الله بن عبد العزيز الـغِــزِّي
هذا جميع ما صدر لي من أعمال رسمية؛ من عام: (2015م) إلى عام: (2026م). ولم أذكر مقالات الـ(PDF) التي كنت أنشرها هنا أو في تويتر. وهذه الأعمال هي: إما أعمال خاصة؛ أو مشتركة؛ أو إشراف على ترجمات. وهي أيضًا: إما مؤلفات مستقلة؛ أو ورقة ضمن كتاب؛ أو مقالة في مجلة أو في موقع؛ أو تقديم لكتاب مترجم مع التعليق عليه أو دون التعليق عليه؛ أو تقديم لنص محقق مع العناية بنشره. وهي بحسب تاريخ صدورها الرسمي: 1- المدخل إلى أوهام الكُتّ…
Signed عبد الله بن عبد العزيز الـغِــزِّي
هذا ما كنت وعدت بنشره؛ ويتضمن ما كتبه الشيخ عبد الله الغزي مستعرضًا كتابي: مصادر علم الكلام الزيدي: ببليوغرافية للمطبوع والمخطوط حتى (ق9هـ/15م) وفيه ما يشبه الترجمة لي، أرجو أن أكون عند حسن الظن. وكما قلت سابقًا: أتفق مع انتقاداته للكتاب جملة وتفصيلًا.
Signed عبد الله بن عبد العزيز الـغِــزِّي
الحمد لله؛ خرج الكتاب من المطبعة.. وهذه طريقة نافعة -إن شاء الله- لقراءة الكتاب لمن عزم على ذلك منكم، وهي: - أولًا: اقرأ التنبيهات والتوضيحات الأولية المتعلقة بطبيعة الكتابة ورموزها وواقع النسخ الخطية لكتاب (الرد على الزنادقة والجهمية) ورموزها. من (ص19) إلى (ص49). فلن تستطيع أن تفهم الكتاب حتى تفهم رموزه؛ الكتاب كله رموز، من مثل: (م)، (ق1)، (ق2)، (النص)، (الرد)، (ت1)، (إ/أ)، (إ/ب)، <ن1/و>، <ن2/ص>، <ن3/ع>، "قصة مناظ…
Signed عبد الله بن عبد العزيز الـغِــزِّي
وهذا ملف يتضمن محتويات الكتاب. https://t.me/al_ghizzi/2094
Signed عبد الله بن عبد العزيز الـغِــزِّي
الحمد لله.. صدر في هذه الأيام هذا الكتاب الجديد لي، ويقع في (936 صفحة). وسيتوفر -إن شاء الله- عند الناشر في الأسابيع المقبلة. وللاطلاع على شرح موجز لطبيعة هذا الكتاب يُنظر الرابط التالي: https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DD8ZCofbb/ والرسالة التالية محتويات هذا الكتاب. والحمد لله الذي وفق وسدد ويسر. عبد الله الـغِـزِّي الرياض، المملكة العربية السعودية صيف عام: (1448هـ/2026م)
Signed عبد الله بن عبد العزيز الـغِــزِّي
https://t.me/al_ghizzi/2066
Signed عبد الله بن عبد العزيز الـغِــزِّي
من سنابي.. ومن أمثلة النوع الأول كتاب «الاستشراق» لإدوارد سعيد. والكتب متباينة في رزقها، مثل تباين رزق بني آدم فيما بينهم. https://t.me/al_ghizzi/1764
Signed عبد الله بن عبد العزيز الـغِــزِّي
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @al_ghizzi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 16 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“عبد الله الـغِـزِّي” (@al_ghizzi), 7,979 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/al_ghizzi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.