Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for عبد الله الـغِـزِّي

Channel

عبد الله الـغِـزِّي

@al_ghizzi

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,979subscribers

+123 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001048129509
TypeChannel
Username@al_ghizzi
Description-للتواصل العلمي: [email protected]. -تويتر: @al_ghizzi -سنابشات: https://www.snapchat.com/add/al_ghizzi -الكلوب هاوس: @al_ghizzi
Created21 April 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/al_ghizzi

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,8557,9797,9175 August 2026 — 7,856 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,856 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,855 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,875 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,928 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,941 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,951 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,946 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,952 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,960 subscribers4 September 2026 — 7,967 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,973 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,976 subscribers17 September 2026 — 7,972 subscribers25 September 2026 — 7,973 subscribers4 October 2026 — 7,977 subscribers10 October 2026 — 7,969 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,975 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,974 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,971 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,974 subscribers26 October 2026 — 7,979 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,975 subscribers1 November 2026 — 7,974 subscribers4 November 2026 — 7,979 subscribers5 August 20264 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 91 days, net +123. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,836–7,998 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 22:467,979+5
1 Nov 2026, 12:277,974-1
29 Oct 2026, 12:297,975-4
26 Oct 2026, 09:257,979+5
23 Oct 2026, 13:397,974+3
20 Oct 2026, 06:417,971-3
17 Oct 2026, 10:307,974-1
14 Oct 2026, 17:417,975+6
10 Oct 2026, 21:597,969-8
4 Oct 2026, 20:157,977+4
25 Sept 2026, 13:217,973+1
17 Sept 2026, 02:387,972-4
13 Sept 2026, 00:567,976+3
9 Sept 2026, 02:577,973+6
4 Sept 2026, 02:367,967+7
31 Aug 2026, 18:567,960+8
28 Aug 2026, 23:257,952+6
25 Aug 2026, 12:537,946-5
22 Aug 2026, 02:147,951+10
15 Aug 2026, 10:137,941first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 9 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.2%
avg views ÷ 7,979 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,210
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held29 (9 December 2025 – 5 November 2026)
Views total3,638
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 11:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈705
Videos
≈33
Links
≈1,110

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
9m 53s
Average length
9m 53s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 18:32 UTC873 viewsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @sam27050Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed عبد الله بن عبد العزيز الـغِــزِّي

5 Nov 2026, 18:32 UTC875 viewsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @sam27050

كنت من المعتقدين بصحة نسبة كتاب الرد على الزنادقة والجهمية للإمام أحمد، وبعد قراءة هذا البحث ومناقشة مؤلفه مرارا وتكرارا في كثير مما كتبه تزلزل هذا الاعتقاد وزال، وصرت بعده في شكٍّ من نسبة الكتاب للإمام أحمد. لا يخفى عليّ ما كتبه المثبتون للنسبة من دلائل، وما كتبه النافون للنسبة من دلائل قبل مطالعة هذا البحث، ولكن مناقشة الباحث الصديق عبدالله الغزي للمثبتين كانت مختلفة جدا عمن سبقه، ومعتمدة على جوانب متعددة ومؤثرة ت…

Signed عبد الله بن عبد العزيز الـغِــزِّي

4 Nov 2026, 06:48 UTC≈1,890 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

https://t.me/al_ghizzi/2077

Signed عبد الله بن عبد العزيز الـغِــزِّي

16 Sept 2026, 09:30 UTC≈3,630 viewsread 6 November 2026

من المقدمات الأساسية التي فاتني التنبيه عليها في هذا اللقاء قضية هل ستتغير عقيدة أحمد بن حنبل عندما نبطل نسبة «الرد على الزنادقة والجهمية» له؟ لأنه يلاحظ في بعض التعليقات على اللقاء كيف يصور الأمر على أن نفي نسبة هذا الكتاب له يخدم طوائف مخالفة لأهل الحديث؛ مثل الأشعرية! هذه القضية عقدت لها فقرة كاملة في كتابي الجديد (ص180-184). وأقول هنا اختصارًا: هذا الكتاب المنسوب لابن حنبل يتضمن سبعة عقائد عامة، وهي: - أن القرآ…

Signed عبد الله بن عبد العزيز الـغِــزِّي

14 Sept 2026, 10:31 UTC≈6,160 viewsread 6 November 2026

أجرى الصديق يوسف بن عمر -مشكورًا- لقاء مطولًا معي في سنابه عن كتابي الجديد «نسبة النصوص التاريخية لغير مؤلفيها». https://youtu.be/MAvTH1rH39M?si=6QxtLNgsPdhw3NEj مشاهدة ممتعة. https://t.me/al_ghizzi/2094

Signed عبد الله بن عبد العزيز الـغِــزِّي

23 Aug 2026, 08:35 UTC≈5,440 viewsread 6 November 2026

هذا جميع ما صدر لي من أعمال رسمية؛ من عام: (2015م) إلى عام: (2026م). ولم أذكر مقالات الـ(PDF) التي كنت أنشرها هنا أو في تويتر. وهذه الأعمال هي: إما أعمال خاصة؛ أو مشتركة؛ أو إشراف على ترجمات. وهي أيضًا: إما مؤلفات مستقلة؛ أو ورقة ضمن كتاب؛ أو مقالة في مجلة أو في موقع؛ أو تقديم لكتاب مترجم مع التعليق عليه أو دون التعليق عليه؛ أو تقديم لنص محقق مع العناية بنشره. وهي بحسب تاريخ صدورها الرسمي: 1- المدخل إلى أوهام الكُتّ…

Signed عبد الله بن عبد العزيز الـغِــزِّي

15 Aug 2026, 06:09 UTC≈4,060 viewsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @mohammadalhusainiFile

هذا ما كنت وعدت بنشره؛ ويتضمن ما كتبه الشيخ عبد الله الغزي مستعرضًا كتابي: مصادر علم الكلام الزيدي: ببليوغرافية للمطبوع والمخطوط حتى (ق9هـ/15م) وفيه ما يشبه الترجمة لي، أرجو أن أكون عند حسن الظن. وكما قلت سابقًا: أتفق مع انتقاداته للكتاب جملة وتفصيلًا.

Signed عبد الله بن عبد العزيز الـغِــزِّي

14 Aug 2026, 06:26 UTC≈6,700 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

الحمد لله؛ خرج الكتاب من المطبعة.. وهذه طريقة نافعة -إن شاء الله- لقراءة الكتاب لمن عزم على ذلك منكم، وهي: - أولًا: اقرأ التنبيهات والتوضيحات الأولية المتعلقة بطبيعة الكتابة ورموزها وواقع النسخ الخطية لكتاب (الرد على الزنادقة والجهمية) ورموزها. من (ص19) إلى (ص49). فلن تستطيع أن تفهم الكتاب حتى تفهم رموزه؛ الكتاب كله رموز، من مثل: (م)، (ق1)، (ق2)، (النص)، (الرد)، (ت1)، (إ/أ)، (إ/ب)، <ن1/و>، <ن2/ص>، <ن3/ع>، "قصة مناظ…

Signed عبد الله بن عبد العزيز الـغِــزِّي

8 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC≈18,800 viewsread 6 November 2026
File

وهذا ملف يتضمن محتويات الكتاب. https://t.me/al_ghizzi/2094

Signed عبد الله بن عبد العزيز الـغِــزِّي

8 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC≈11,700 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

الحمد لله.. صدر في هذه الأيام هذا الكتاب الجديد لي، ويقع في (936 صفحة). وسيتوفر -إن شاء الله- عند الناشر في الأسابيع المقبلة. وللاطلاع على شرح موجز لطبيعة هذا الكتاب يُنظر الرابط التالي: https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DD8ZCofbb/ والرسالة التالية محتويات هذا الكتاب. والحمد لله الذي وفق وسدد ويسر. عبد الله الـغِـزِّي الرياض، المملكة العربية السعودية صيف عام: (1448هـ/2026م)

Signed عبد الله بن عبد العزيز الـغِــزِّي

20 Jun 2026, 08:32 UTC≈5,500 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

https://t.me/al_ghizzi/2066

Signed عبد الله بن عبد العزيز الـغِــزِّي

17 Jun 2026, 07:15 UTC≈5,680 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

من سنابي.. ومن أمثلة النوع الأول كتاب «الاستشراق» لإدوارد سعيد. والكتب متباينة في رزقها، مثل تباين رزق بني آدم فيما بينهم. https://t.me/al_ghizzi/1764

Signed عبد الله بن عبد العزيز الـغِــزِّي

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @al_ghizzi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

مكتبة المتنبي ....pdf📚 روايات المكتبة الجامعية بحوث قناة مدرسية كتابة البحوث دراسات
@Almootnbe100 · 88,132
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
مخزن الكتب (أعمال كاملة)
@bookiraqnow3 · 37,752
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 September 2026
قناة || عبدالله السليمان
@KNASH333 · 20,672
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 29 September 2026
مكتبة شغف
@Passion_1 · 26,577
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 September 2026
مكتبة عمر عكاشة
@omerokasha · 23,095
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 September 2026
كناش الأنظار والفوائد
@tr728 · 22,815
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 September 2026
مكتبة ملفات كتب الشيعة
@shiabooks_pdf · 69,416
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 21 August 2026
المكتبة العربية 📚
@arabicbooks · 21,808
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 September 2026
تقوية التركيز والذاكرة
@mensa09 · 83,790
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
كتب المعقولات
@kobpdf · 19,639
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 1 October 2026
الحبيب علي الجفري | Alhabib Ali Al Jifri
@alhabibali · 19,483
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 30 September 2026
قناة د/ سلطان العميري
@sutanalomairi · 38,059
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
عالم الكتاب
@ahn2323 · 60,809
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026
مكتبة المثنوي
@lmatnawi · 41,859
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
Emad Rashad Osman
@emadrashadosman · 54,860
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 24 August 2026
أفكار وأسْمَار
@alnatheerr · 32,598
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 16 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“عبد الله الـغِـزِّي” (@al_ghizzi), 7,979 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/al_ghizzi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.