Channel
@sam27050
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
16,491subscribers
+651 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001166798575 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sam27050 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 49 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sam27050 |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Oct 2026, 01:17 | 16,491 | +9 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 02:08 | 16,482 | +14 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 02:17 | 16,468 | -2 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 01:50 | 16,470 | +6 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 00:58 | 16,464 | +3 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 01:47 | 16,461 | +7 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 23:17 | 16,454 | +8 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 23:44 | 16,446 | +18 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 20:46 | 16,428 | +3 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 19:47 | 16,425 | +5 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 19:29 | 16,420 | +4 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 20:00 | 16,416 | +6 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 17:31 | 16,410 | +20 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 05:35 | 16,390 | +33 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 21:42 | 16,357 | +34 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 12:58 | 16,323 | +88 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 04:00 | 16,235 | +64 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 10:59 | 16,171 | +4 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 16,167 | +18 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:39 | 16,149 | first reading |
26 posts held, back to 16 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 26 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
647 reactions across 26 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 541 | 83.6% | |
| 👍 | 106 | 16.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 647 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 16 May 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
لا تكتب مدخلا للدرء، وأنت غيرُ محقق في العلوم العقلية؛ فتقعَ في خطأ يضحك صغار طلبة الحوزات الشيعية كالقول بأن الهيولى في زعم الفلاسفة أمر كلي ذهني، والصواب أن هذا ما يزعمه صاحب الدرء في المجردات التي يتكلم عنها الحكماء كالعقول والهيولى غير المقارنة للصورة الجسمية ليس لها عنده وجودٌ في الخارج العيني.
❤21👍13
لم يكن إبداع الإمام الرازي - رحمه الله- منحصرا في توسيعه الأبحاث الكلامية والفلسفية على هذا النمط الذي لم يُسبق إليه ولم يعرفه العلماء قبله أصلا على هذا النحو من التعمق والتدقيق، وإنما كان مُبدعا- أيضا - على مستوى الإخراج الفني للكتاب، فإن لديه عقلية هندسية عجيبة في تقسيم الأبواب والفصول والمباحث، سبق بها ما يوجد الآن في خطط البحث في الأكاديميات الحديثة، وقد أدرَك ذلك بعض مترجميه، فقال الصفدي أو ابن خلكان أو السيوطي-…
❤54
Photo, posted without a caption
❤12👍5
وهذا ملف يتضمن محتويات الكتاب. https://t.me/al_ghizzi/2094
👍4❤3
كنت من المعتقدين بصحة نسبة كتاب الرد على الزنادقة والجهمية للإمام أحمد، وبعد قراءة هذا البحث ومناقشة مؤلفه مرارا وتكرارا في كثير مما كتبه تزلزل هذا الاعتقاد وزال، وصرت بعده في شكٍّ من نسبة الكتاب للإمام أحمد. لا يخفى عليّ ما كتبه المثبتون للنسبة من دلائل، وما كتبه النافون للنسبة من دلائل قبل مطالعة هذا البحث، ولكن مناقشة الباحث الصديق عبدالله الغزي للمثبتين كانت مختلفة جدا عمن سبقه، ومعتمدة على جوانب متعددة ومؤثرة ت…
❤29
Photo, posted without a caption
👍6❤5
أنا يهمني معرفة هؤلاء السلفيين لتقرير ابن تيمية في حكم المخالفين للحقّ من أهل القبلة في مسائل الأصول والفروع إذا أرادوا إصابة الحق الذي جاء به الرسول ولم يصيبوه، وأنّ ابن تيمية نصر قول العنبري في الباب ونسبه للسلف مع بيانه لمقصود العنبري بالتصويب. وأما كونُ منكر العلو من أهل القبلة لا يتصور أن يتحقق في حقه مانعٌ من موانع التكفير كالتأويل فهذا جانبٌ آخر من البحث، ومردُّ استبعاد هؤلاء السلفيين وعدم تصورهم لقيام مانع ا…
❤27👍6
كلامُ ابن تيمية في النبوات ليس عن الإمكان الذاتي، فإنّ الإمكانَ الذاتيَّ اعتباريٌ، وإنما كلامه عن الإمكان الذي يكون صفةً للفاعل وعرضا قائمًا بالممكن، وهو الإمكانُ الاستعدادي، وهو أمرٌ وجودي لا اعتباري. ثم إنَّ جميع من تكلموا عما قررته على جهة الخلاف لا يحيطون بهذه المقالات علمًا، فلا حاجة إلى تناول ما ذكروه اعتراضًا ونقضا.
❤9👍7
"دفع التكفير عن علماء المسلمين وإن أخطئوا هو من أحق الأغراض الشرعية" [ابن تيمية، مجموع الفتاوى 35/103]
❤44
ابنُ حزم ليس جاهلا بالمذهب الأشعري، ويظهر جدا مطالعته لكتب الباقلاني وبعض تلاميذه، وهو شديد الخلاف مع أقوالهم وخصوصا في زيادة الصفات وحقيقة الكلام والإيمان وكثير من الدقيق. ولكن عنده تحاملٌ شديد على الأشعرية وإلزامات على المذهب قد ذكرت بعضها سابقًا.
❤24👍5
الدكتور سعيد فودة يمزح في كلامه هذا 😁. الجهالات العلمية في هذا الزمن في الشأن العقدي لا تخصُّ مذهبًا دون مذهب.
👍10❤7
وقفتُ على مقطعٍ لأحد الجهلة الذين يكثرون في هذا الزمان، يرفض العقلَ لأن العقل مطلقًا لا يفيدُ القطع، وإنما يفيد الظنّ، وينسب ذلك لابن تيمية!! ويقول أيضًا إنما يقول ابنُ تيمية ما قاله تنزلا!! للفائدة: ابنُ تيمية في مناقشته للقانون الكلي أستطيعُ أن أقولَ لكم استبدل عبارة العقل أصل النقل بعبارة أكثر دقةً وصوابًا وهي: "الشرعُ أصل الشرع"؛ لأنّ الشرع ليس أخبارًا محضة بل قد تضمن أقيسة عقلية هي الأمثال المضروبة، وهذه الأ…
❤43👍12
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @sam27050. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 160 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“العلوم العقلية | سامي السميري” (@sam27050), 16,491 subscribers as measured 27 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sam27050.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.