Channel
@melhamy
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
104,346subscribers
-886 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001002613976 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @melhamy |
| Description | باحث في التاريخ والحضارة الإسلامية |
| Created | 6 November 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/melhamy |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 28% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Recorded in 2019 as “محمد إلهامي” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 14:18 | 104,346 | -66 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 14:16 | 104,412 | -41 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:35 | 104,453 | -70 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:29 | 104,523 | -29 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:05 | 104,552 | -30 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:25 | 104,582 | -25 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:41 | 104,607 | -12 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:53 | 104,619 | -39 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:27 | 104,658 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:08 | 104,662 | -43 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:36 | 104,705 | -11 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:58 | 104,716 | -38 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:58 | 104,754 | -52 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 104,806 | -20 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 104,826 | -27 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 104,853 | -29 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:52 | 104,882 | -37 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 104,919 | -19 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 104,938 | -63 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 105,001 | first reading |
58 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 58 (18 July 2026 – 7 September 2026) |
| Views total | 463,300 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Sept 2026, 17:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
"استعملنا لهم التاريخ".. هذه هي فوائد التاريخ التي انفردت بها أمة الإسلام | محمد إلهامي - ما معنى قول سفيان الثوري: لما استعمل الرواة الكذب استعملنا لهم التاريخ؟ وهل لها تطبيقات معاصرة؟ - كيف كانت نشأة علم التاريخ عند المسلمين نشأة فريدة؟! ولماذا حصل هذا في الأمة الإسلامية وحدها؟! - وثيقة تاريخية ترجع إلى النبي قدمها يهود خيبر إلى أبي القاسم بن مسلمة تخبر أن النبي وضع عنهم الجزية.. كيف ذلك؟ - سائر الأمم قرأت التاريخ…
نصيحة الأستاذ حفظه الله للشباب المسلم.
خالص العزاء وأخر المواساة للأستاذ الإعلامي الكبير محمد ناصر في وفاة شقيقه بالمعتقلات المصرية.. رحمه الله ورفع درجته في عليين وتقبله في الصالحين.. وانتقم الله له ممن ظلمه وحبسه وآذاه وتسبب في قتله.. انتقاماً نسأل الله أن نراه قريبا في الدنيا، قبل أن يشفي الله به صدور المؤمنين في الآخرة!!
السيرة النبوية | 101. سرية كبيرة تخرج في وقت جدب وجوع، وحيوان غريب يخرج لها!! | محمد إلهامي - خمسة عشر رجلا فحسب، فرت أمامها بنو ثعلبة.. كيف كان ذلك؟ - لماذا تخرج سرية كبيرة على قيادتها رجال من الصف الأول ولم يكن لها تمويل؟ - سرية الخبط.. دروس عظيمة في الكرم والعفة والمواساة مع أنه لم يقع فيها قتال ولا غنائم.. ماذا حصل؟!! - لطيفة من لطائف النبي، نقض عمامة عبد الرحمن بن عوف، لماذا؟! - فقيه المدينة أبو سلمة بن عبد الر…
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم بعد نجاح حملتنا لشهر 8 في كسر حاجز 100 ألف مشاهدة مستعينين بالله، نعلن إطلاق حملة أبناء كعب بن مالك رضي الله عنه لشهر 9، حملة نهدف فيها لجمع الجهود في سبيل نصرة العلماء وبث كلمتهم في الناس من خلال السوشيال ميديا. فكرة الحملة باختصار: عملنا على جلب سلاسل العلماء والدعاة، التي تعتني بكتاب الله سبحانه وتعالى وسنة نبيه ﷺ وسير العلماء والمصلحين والعلم بالواقع، ثم عمدنا إلى هذه السلاسل وقمنا بتحو…
إلى أهلنا الطيبين، أهل العراقة والحضارة، في أرض العراق الحبيب العريق!! هذه بعض كتب أخيكم تصل إليكم
يمكن القول الآن بأن مصر تعيش زمانا يشبه زمان فرعون.. حملة الاعتقالات الموسعة والمجنونة التي تشنها السلطة تكاد تترك بيوت المعارضين كما كانت بيوت بني إسرائيل قديما.. الحملة الآن تشمل تقريبا كل الذكور، وطالت بعض النساء أيضا، فما من معارض بالخارج، بل وكثير ممن لم يعودوا معارضين من زمن، قد اعتقل إخوتهم أو أبناء إخوتهم أو إخوة زوجاتهم أو أزواج أخواتهم.. كأنه مشهد من قوله تعالى {يستحيي نساءهم}.. وقد كان بعض الأصدقاء الح…
وهذا يفسر لك: لماذا تنحو الموالد المقامة الآن إلى أن تكثر فيها البدع والضلالات، ولماذا تقتصر على حديث الخوارق والمعجزات وأوصاف النبي الخَلْقِية دون غيرها من صفاته الخُلُقية وسنته العملية؟! إن الأمة الحبيسة المقهورة المكبلة بأيدي هؤلاء الطغاة عاجزة أن تعبر عن حبها لنبيها في ذكراه إلا بقدر ما يسمح به الطاغية الذي يكبلها، ومن هذه الأمة مِن علماء السوء مَن غَرَّه أولئك الطغاة السفاحون فانحاز إليهم فهو وسيلتهم في تزوير ح…
من المعروف أن النبي وصحابته والتابعين في القرون الأولى المفضلة لم يحتفلوا بمولد النبي ﷺ، ولا يؤثر عنهم فيه لا عبادة ولا عادة مخصوصة، وإنما بدأت عادة الاحتفال بالمولد النبوي في الأزمان التي فترت فيها الأمة وتوقف فيها الجهاد واتسعت الهوة بين الخلفاء وبين الرعية. وكما قال ابن تيمية فإن النفوس خُلقت لتعمل لا لتترك، وما من شئ من المنكر نهى الله عنه إلا ووجَّه إلى معروفٍ يُغني عنه، ولذلك فإنه ينبغي على المصلحين الاعتناء ب…
هل الاحتفال بالمولد النبوي بدعة؟ محمد إلهامي - مجلة أنصار النبي ﷺ - سبتمبر 2026م لن أخوض الآن في جواب هذا السؤال، ولن أدخل في الجدل بين المانعين والمجيزين، بل سأذكر نبذة تاريخية ربما تنفع المتكلمين فيه..
فليس الحق أن نتجادل ونتعارك حول ما إن كان الاحتفال بالمولد بدعة أم لا، وهل هو من البدعة الحسنة أم لا؟.. الحق أن نتجادل: كيف نكافح تزييف صورة النبيﷺ في عقول المسلمين؟ وكيف تكون ذكراه مواطن قوة ونهضة، وذكرى نافعة لأمة مستضعفة؟ من مقال هل الاحتفال بالمولد النبوي بدعة؟ بقلم : م. محمد إلهامي - رئيس تحرير المجلة لقراءة المقال كاملًا:https://supportprophetm.com/v0y2
لا يأسر يهودٌ أحدًا إلّا وأصابني من الهمّ والضيق ما اللهُ به عليمٌ، وهذا بخلاف القتل والإعدام مع كونه عظيمًا شنيعًا. وما هذا إلّا لما نراه ونعلمه ممّا لا يجهله أحدٌ من شدّة وطول زمان الأذى والبلاء والعذاب والإذلال الذي يلقاه المأسور الذي ليس له بواكي، وحسبنا الله ونعم الوكيل. فيهود اليوم، لا يتورّعون عن ارتكاب واستعمال أبشع وأقسى وسائل وأساليب التعذيب ضد الأسرى، لا يفرّقون في ذلك بين رجل ولا امرأة، ولا صغيرٍ ولا كبير…
Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @melhamy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 94 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Mohammad Ilhami |
|---|---|
| Description | Egyptian researcher, historian and political activist |
| YouTube | UCP-PfkMcOKriSxFMH7pTxfA |
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة: محمد إلهامي” (@melhamy), 104,346 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/melhamy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.