Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for سعيد زياد

Channel

سعيد زياد

@saidziad

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

21,580subscribers

-294 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002126643879
TypeChannel
Username@saidziad
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/saidziad

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

21,54021,87421,7077 August 2026 — 21,874 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,874 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,872 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,864 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,859 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,852 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,835 subscribers13 August 2026 — 21,818 subscribers14 August 2026 — 21,805 subscribers16 August 2026 — 21,790 subscribers17 August 2026 — 21,780 subscribers18 August 2026 — 21,772 subscribers19 August 2026 — 21,761 subscribers20 August 2026 — 21,751 subscribers21 August 2026 — 21,741 subscribers23 August 2026 — 21,725 subscribers24 August 2026 — 21,710 subscribers25 August 2026 — 21,695 subscribers26 August 2026 — 21,685 subscribers27 August 2026 — 21,675 subscribers28 August 2026 — 21,666 subscribers29 August 2026 — 21,663 subscribers30 August 2026 — 21,661 subscribers31 August 2026 — 21,650 subscribers1 September 2026 — 21,641 subscribers2 September 2026 — 21,640 subscribers3 September 2026 — 21,632 subscribers6 September 2026 — 21,610 subscribers9 September 2026 — 21,589 subscribers11 September 2026 — 21,553 subscribers13 September 2026 — 21,540 subscribers15 September 2026 — 21,577 subscribers17 September 2026 — 21,580 subscribers21,5807 August 202617 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net -294. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,490–21,924 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 09:5921,580+3
15 Sept 2026, 08:5921,577+37
13 Sept 2026, 17:5721,540-13
11 Sept 2026, 21:0121,553-36
9 Sept 2026, 06:5921,589-21
6 Sept 2026, 00:5521,610-22
3 Sept 2026, 18:1921,632-8
2 Sept 2026, 10:4421,640-1
1 Sept 2026, 09:0521,641-9
31 Aug 2026, 09:2721,650-11
30 Aug 2026, 10:1921,661-2
29 Aug 2026, 12:5421,663-3
28 Aug 2026, 16:0621,666-9
27 Aug 2026, 19:0621,675-10
26 Aug 2026, 20:3621,685-10
25 Aug 2026, 18:1921,695-15
24 Aug 2026, 19:3221,710-15
23 Aug 2026, 05:5621,725-16
21 Aug 2026, 14:4721,741-10
20 Aug 2026, 16:5621,751first reading

Engagement

62 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.5%
avg views ÷ 21,580 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,150
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 62 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held62 (19 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total165,970
Reactions total7,569
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 13:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
33m 14s
Average length
1m 51s

Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

19,526 reactions across 61 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7,73439.6%
💔2,34612.0%
🫡2,21111.3%
👍1,4007.17%
💯1,2186.24%
😢9384.80%
🤬7413.79%
😁5262.69%
🔥4942.53%
🤣4392.25%
🥰3191.63%
🙏2561.31%
😭2301.18%
👎2031.04%
🤮1020.522%
👏670.343%
😡570.292%
🤔410.21%
🤡330.169%
🍌320.164%
18 further kinds1390.712%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 61 of the 62 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19,526 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 18:18 UTC≈3,340 views115 reactionsread 3 September 2026

اختطاف العرابيد: لماذا نجحت إسرائيل اليوم فيما فشلت فيه أمس ؟

68🤔27😭10👀6👍2💔1🤣1

2 Sept 2026, 18:18 UTC≈3,390 views114 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍7121😢11💯6😭2👎1💔1🤣1

2 Sept 2026, 17:13 UTC≈3,610 views99 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

‏هل تصبح غزة ضفة غربية جديدة ؟! ‏قراءة في العملية الأمنية التي استهدفت اختطاف العرابيد ‏الفيديو على يوتيوب: https://youtu.be/ErbaZpI3bYY?si=UkfGSh-25y4p5niO

88👍7👀3🤣1

2 Sept 2026, 13:40 UTC≈4,190 views210 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

نتنياهو يحتسي القهوة مرتدياًً خوذة عسكرية قرب الخط الأصفر في قطاع غزة: "نحن نسيطر على الأرض وسنبقى على هذا الخط، نبذل كل ما في وسعنا للوصول إلى هدفنا، وهو نزع سلاح حماس وتجريد غزة من السلاح، غزة لن تشكل بعد الآن تهديدا لإسرائيل"

🤬154🍌20👎14💔6🔥4🤣4😡3🌚2

2 Sept 2026, 11:57 UTC≈4,490 views255 reactionsread 3 September 2026

‏حادثة اختطاف ضابط الأمن في غزة أمس تتجاوز حدود نتائج العملية (الأمنية والعسكرية) إلى تأسيس بيئة أمنية واستراتيجية لقطاع غزة في مرحلة "ما بعد الحرب". ‏يحاول العدو بناء بيئة عمل مشابهة لبيئة الضفة الغربية، لا تعتمد على الاختراق الاستخباراتي المستمر والتكنولوجيا والمراقبة الجوية والاستهداف من السماء فحسب، بل تتطور تدريجياً نحو إعادة الهيمنة الميدانية عبر عمليات اقتحام موضعي خاطفة وانسحابات تكتيكية. ‏وفي هذا السياق، ي

135😢47👍33🙏20💯11🔥7💔1🤣1

2 Sept 2026, 06:32 UTC≈4,740 views293 reactionsread 3 September 2026

نتنياهو: ما حدث في 7 أكتوبر إخفاق كبير، وأنا كنت نائماً، وقرروا ألا يوقظوني

🤣214😁38🤡22🍌8🔥5😴5🙈1

1 Sept 2026, 17:55 UTC≈5,690 views423 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

في الفيديو يظهر ضابط الأمن الداخلي (العرابيد) الذي اختطفته قوات العدو اليوم وهو يقاتل ويشتبك رغم إصابته واستهدافه بالرصاص والقنابل والمسيرات. ما حدث ضربة للمقاومة نعم، لكن الاستبسال في القتال أمام هذا القدر من القوة بطولة تحسب للرجل ولعائلته التي سقط منها شهداء وجرحى خلال الاشتباك. من المهم الإشارة إلى أن غزة مستباحة أمنياً نظراً للوضع الكارثي الذي مرّ بها، وسيطرة العدو عسكرياً على 70% منها، وتغلغله الأمني فيما تبق

💔267🫡68😭5224😢4👍3🔥3🤣2

1 Sept 2026, 11:16 UTC≈5,870 views243 reactionsread 3 September 2026

العدو يتراجع عن روايته ويقول أن الأسير هو ضابط في الأمن الداخلي وليس قائد جهاز أمن حماس

💔15926🙏19🤣15😢14👍5🔥5

1 Sept 2026, 11:06 UTC≈5,850 views230 reactionsread 3 September 2026

عاجل | مصدر أمني في غزة للجزيرة: قوة إسرائيلية خاصة اختطفت أحد ضباط جهاز الأمن الداخلي بعد قصف مسكنه واستشهاد زوجته

😢142🤬41💔31🙏54🤯3😡3🤣1

1 Sept 2026, 11:03 UTC≈5,780 views201 reactionsread 3 September 2026

عاجل | مصدر أمني في غزة للجزيرة: ننفي اعتقال مدير جهاز الأمن الداخلي في القطاع

131🫡46👍13🙏6🔥3🤣2

1 Sept 2026, 09:54 UTC≈5,950 views208 reactionsread 3 September 2026

كاتس: اعتقلنا قبل قليل مطلوبا كبيرا في حماس

💔129😡40👎24🤣8👀3🙏31

1 Sept 2026, 09:54 UTC≈5,590 views165 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @AlarabyTvBrk

عاجل | القناة 12 الإسرائيلية عن مصدر: الجيش اعتقل قائد الأمن الداخلي في حركة حماس

💔112👎33😢11🤣6🙏21

Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @saidziad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

إسماعيل الغول - Ismail Alghoul
@ismail_gh2 · 28,298
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 9 September 2026
أحمد دراوشة - التلفزيون العربي
@AhmadDarawsheh · 42,475
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“سعيد زياد” (@saidziad), 21,580 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/saidziad.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.