National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
49 measurements spanning 78 days, net -18,266. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 375,037–398,906 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 49
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
23 Oct 2026, 22:55
377,886
+95
22 Oct 2026, 21:41
377,791
-280
21 Oct 2026, 20:45
378,071
-260
20 Oct 2026, 16:28
378,331
-200
19 Oct 2026, 13:11
378,531
-237
18 Oct 2026, 12:21
378,768
-304
17 Oct 2026, 10:49
379,072
-225
16 Oct 2026, 13:44
379,297
-305
15 Oct 2026, 10:06
379,602
-226
14 Oct 2026, 12:49
379,828
-251
13 Oct 2026, 02:54
380,079
-843
8 Oct 2026, 22:38
380,922
-967
4 Oct 2026, 11:19
381,889
-2,058
25 Sept 2026, 23:57
383,947
-1,030
19 Sept 2026, 09:35
384,977
-539
17 Sept 2026, 00:38
385,516
-355
15 Sept 2026, 04:39
385,871
-452
13 Sept 2026, 13:19
386,323
-387
11 Sept 2026, 18:39
386,710
-209
9 Sept 2026, 07:20
386,919
first reading
Engagement
1,881 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 162 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.51%
avg views ÷ 377,886 subscribers
Avg views / post
17,000
711 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
713
of 1,881 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 October 2026
Posts held
1,881 (6 August 2026 – 23 October 2026)
Views total
12,116,210
Reactions total
214,473
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
24 Oct 2026, 01:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈29,600
Videos
≈14,100
Links
≈5,470
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5h 34m
Average length
1m 07s
Measured directly from 299 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
296,405 reactions across 996 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
95,803
32.3%
🤣
57,584
19.4%
😢
46,699
15.8%
💯
34,330
11.6%
🔥
27,820
9.39%
🤬
13,281
4.48%
💩
9,562
3.23%
👍
5,563
1.88%
❤🔥
4,622
1.56%
🥰
709
0.239%
😁
397
0.134%
🎉
29
0.01%
⚡
6
0.002%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 996 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 296,405 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 11 September 2026 to 23 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
فيديو هام للشهيد نزار بنات يرد فيه على المنبطحين أصحاب خطاب “ التوقيت مشبوه “
هاد الفيديو من سنوات، شو ملاحظين ؟ مش نزار بحكي عن نفس الخطاب اللي قاعدين بنسمعوا اليوم ؟
الموضوع ما الو علاقة بانتخابات او لا .. هذول جماعة مطوبزين وانبطاحيين وانهزاميين في كل الاوقات والمراحل .
استطلاع قناة كان الليلة ..
كتلة نتنياهو 50
كتلة أيزنكوت 52
العرب 14
هندل وزليخا 4
حسب استطلاع قناة كان، وبمقارنة مع اخر استطلاع قبل يومين
نتنياهو يتراجع ٣ مقاعد، وايزنكوت يتقدم مقعدين
وين المطوبزين اللي بحكوا العملية خدمت نتنياهو ؟
نستذكر في هذا اليوم البطولي..
مُلهم الثوار والأحرار الشيخ الشَّهيد صالح العاروري:
"اضربوهم في كُل مكان يَجب أن يفقدُوا الأمن في كُل مكان"..
#عملية_الخليل
هروب المستوطنين بعد تصدي الشبان لهم في الحي الشرقي من قرية بورين، جنوب نابلس.
تحية إلى شباب وثوار وابطال بورين الذين يتصدون لاعتداءات المستوطنين المجرمين 🔥🔥
ويبقى شعارنا الخالد
اللي مش مع المقاومة ابن حرام مصفى
💯460❤79👍27🔥13
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,881 posts we hold for @meshheek. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@meshheek edited 26 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
17 August 2026
Most recent edit
16 October 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
المجد الأمني @almajdps0 · 19,713 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 29 September 2026
محبي الفنان علي نسمان @alinassman · 19,853 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 28 September 2026
نبض نابلس @nabdnablus · 19,894 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 27 September 2026
Fayez Al-Dwairi I اللواء فايز الدويري @fayezaldwairi52 · 21,741 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 23 September 2026
سعيد زياد @saidziad · 21,260 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 23 September 2026
نَبض العَرين 🔻 @al3reeeen · 34,000 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 2 September 2026
مؤسَّسة قُربات الإنسانية. @qhfgaza · 42,850 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 27 August 2026
ISNAD - Palestine Movement @IsnadPalestin · 47,146 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 26 August 2026
في خلل @Fe_khalal · 47,733 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 25 August 2026
أخبارك رام الله @ramallahnewss · 57,193 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 August 2026
علي دار علي المراسل الحربي @alidaralipress · 90,648 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 16 August 2026
الأستاذ المترجم عزام ابو العدس @azzamaddas · 251,475 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 August 2026
المستشار احمد ابو اياد @Almustashaar · 826,114 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 8 August 2026
Metras - متراس @metrasweb · 21,412 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 September 2026
Tulkarem Net | طولكرم نت @TulkaremNet · 22,330 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 19 September 2026
️ نصر البرقاوي @naserbarqawe94 · 31,241 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 September 2026
الحارس @alhares · 66,389 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 August 2026
شبكة أخبار الخليل @khalelnews · 81,347 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 18 August 2026
الخليل في قلب الحدث @From_hebron · 111,134 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 14 August 2026
FajerNews فجر نيوز @fajernews · 150,432 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
الداعية محمود الحسنات @abohamzahasanat · 257,818 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 11 August 2026
Ramallah Mix - رام الله مكس @ramallahmix1 · 302,939 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 August 2026
نابلس غير " الاخبارية 🇵🇸 " @Nablusgheer · 380,561 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 10 August 2026
شبكة قدس الإخبارية @qudsn · 616,419 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 337 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
One domain this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مش هيك” (@meshheek), 377,886 subscribers as measured 23 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/meshheek.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.