📖 الكتاب الأربعون: #ديوان_أبي_الطيب_المتنبي 💡وِرد يوم الأربعاء ٢٠/ ٣ 📕 ديوان أبي الطيب المتنبي بتحقيق د. عبدالوهاب عزام: ❁ الشاميَّات: [أرقٌ على أرقٍ ومثليَ يأرقُ] من صفحة (٢٠) إلى صفحة (٣٩). 📗 ديوان أبي الطيب المتنبي بتحقيق د. إبراهيم البطشان: ❁ قافية الباء: [دمعٌ جرى فقضى في الرَّبع ما وجبا] من صفحة (٢١٥) إلى صفحة (٢٤٦). وفّقكم الله.. #إحياء_البيان

Channel
إحياء البيان
@ehyaa7
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,975subscribers
+178 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001117711970 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ehyaa7 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 30 November 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 44 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ehyaa7 |
Topic
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Oct 2026, 17:39 | 11,975 | +6 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 15:05 | 11,969 | -1 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 15:56 | 11,970 | +6 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 16:36 | 11,964 | -5 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 14:30 | 11,969 | +2 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 13:48 | 11,967 | -1 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 13:00 | 11,968 | -2 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 04:26 | 11,970 | -3 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 00:15 | 11,973 | +4 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 13:56 | 11,969 | -5 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 04:22 | 11,974 | +9 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 09:17 | 11,965 | +5 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:20 | 11,960 | -1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:58 | 11,961 | -3 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:41 | 11,964 | +4 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 07:41 | 11,960 | +5 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 23:17 | 11,955 | +4 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 19:00 | 11,951 | +3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:53 | 11,948 | +11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:46 | 11,937 | first reading |
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 4 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 27 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
146 reactions across 24 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 111 | 76.0% | |
| 👍 | 26 | 17.8% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 2.74% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 1.37% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.685% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.685% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.685% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 146 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
📖 الكتاب الأربعون: #ديوان_أبي_الطيب_المتنبي 💡وِرد يوم الثلاثاء ١٩/ ٣ 📕 ديوان أبي الطيب المتنبي بتحقيق د. عبدالوهاب عزام: ❁ الشاميَّات: [أحيا وأيسرُ ما قاسيتُ ما قتلا] من صفحة (١٠) إلى صفحة (٢٠). 📗 ديوان أبي الطيب المتنبي بتحقيق د. إبراهيم البطشان: ❁ قافية الباء: [تجفّ الأرضُ من هذا الربابِ] من صفحة (١٩٧) إلى صفحة (٢١٤). وفّقكم الله.. #إحياء_البيان
❤4👍3
.
.
📖 إعادة الكتاب الأربعين: #ديوان_أبي_الطيب_المتنبي 💡وِرد يوم الأحد والاثنين ١٧-٣/١٨ 📕 ديوان أبي الطيب المتنبي بتحقيق د. عبدالوهاب عزام: ❁ العراقيات الأولى من صفحة (١) إلى صفحة (١٠). 📗 ديوان أبي الطيب المتنبي بتحقيق د. إبراهيم البطشان: ❁ قافيتا الهمزة والألف الساكنة. من صفحة (١٧٨) إلى صفحة (١٩٦). وفّقكم الله.. #إحياء_البيان
❤12
File, posted without a caption
❤9🤩1
• قد استحسنّا إعادة قراءة ديوان المتنبي مجرّدًا بعد قراءة شرحه وما يتعلّق به ممّا تخيّرنا مِن كتب الأدب، وسنشرع في الإعادة إن شاء الله يوم الأحد. ❁ إحياء البيان
❤12👎4👍2😍2🎉1
📖 الكتاب الثالث والأربعون: #العود_الهندي عن أماليّ في ديوان الكِنْدي للسَّيد عبدالرحمن #السقاف 💡وِرد يوم الثلاثاء ٢٩/ ١ ❁ المجلس السادس عشر- المجلد الثالث: 📙 [خاتمة المجلس] من صفحة (٣٩٧) إلى صفحة (٤٢٥) والحمد لله الذي بنعمته تتمُّ الصالحات.. #إحياء_البيان
❤10👍2
📖 الكتاب الثالث والأربعون: #العود_الهندي عن أماليّ في ديوان الكِنْدي للسَّيد عبدالرحمن #السقاف 💡وِرد يوم الأحد والاثنين ٢٧-٢٨/ ١ ❁ المجلس السادس عشر- المجلد الثالث: 📙 [أليس عجيبًا أنّ وصفكَ مُعجزٌ] من صفحة (٣٦٩) إلى صفحة (٣٩٦) وفقكم الله.. #إحياء_البيان
❤4👍1
📖 الكتاب الثالث والأربعون: #العود_الهندي عن أماليّ في ديوان الكِنْدي للسَّيد عبدالرحمن #السقاف 💡وِرد يوم الخميس ٢٤/ ١ ❁ المجلس السادس عشر- المجلد الثالث: 📙 [فصيحٌ متى ينطق تجد كلّ لفظةٍ] من صفحة (٣٥٢) إلى صفحة (٣٦٨) وفقكم الله.. #إحياء_البيان
❤3👍1
📖 الكتاب الثالث والأربعون: #العود_الهندي عن أماليّ في ديوان الكِنْدي للسَّيد عبدالرحمن #السقاف 💡وِرد يومي الثلاثاء والأربعاء ٢٢-٢٣/ ١ ❁ المجلس السادس عشر- المجلد الثالث: 📙 [ولا ثوبَ مجدٍ غيرَ ثوبِ ابنِ أحمدٍ] من صفحة (٣٢٤) إلى صفحة (٣٥١) وفقكم الله.. #إحياء_البيان
❤3👍1
📖 الكتاب الثالث والأربعون: #العود_الهندي عن أماليّ في ديوان الكِنْدي للسَّيد عبدالرحمن #السقاف 💡وِرد يوم الأحد والاثنين ٢٠-٢١/ ١ ❁ المجلس السادس عشر- المجلد الثالث: 📙 [فما جلسَتْ حتى انثَنَتْ تُوسِعُ الخُطى] من صفحة (٢٩١) إلى صفحة (٣٢٤) وفقكم الله.. #إحياء_البيان
❤3👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @ehyaa7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@chankiti · 22,892
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 September 2026
@Aalsharqawy · 31,559
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 5 September 2026
@alnader412libearyemenbook · 40,373
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
@gherasal3elm · 35,770
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
@i9rae · 35,637
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 1 September 2026
@Mishref_Arabic · 30,734
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 7 September 2026
@yatadarasonah · 32,816
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
@mohamadaliyousef · 19,269
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 October 2026
@ayman0789459028 · 112,194
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 August 2026
@zad_100 · 31,731
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 5 September 2026
@l_alnader2 · 103,988
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 August 2026
@Quran_Station · 360,843
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 August 2026
@hatheehi_sabili_asmaa · 28,608
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
@monsit3 · 30,990
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 7 September 2026
@ktb7sria · 43,350
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 29 August 2026
@mkalosyme · 38,566
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 4 September 2026
@ktbsthatia · 37,724
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 1 September 2026
@ebooksar · 56,638
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 September 2026
@amerbahjat · 32,776
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 5 September 2026
@IbnMalekAr · 41,909
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
@shikhalamood · 44,913
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 27 August 2026
@itsTheQuraan · 277,884
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 10 August 2026
@alraahwalslaah · 21,440
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 September 2026
@laboratoryspcme · 61,025
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 134 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“إحياء البيان” (@ehyaa7), 11,975 subscribers as measured 21 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ehyaa7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.