ما نطرحه ليس معصوماً ولا نهائياً؛ لكنه يعبر عن آرائنا وعصارة أفكارنا على أي حال، لذلك فلعله من المناسب أن نلتقي للحوار، وليكن هذا "الملتقى الفكري" خلاقاً ومثمراً. 📌رابط الملتقى الفكري | تليجرام : 🔹️https://t.me/almultaqa_khaledsaeed

Channel
د.خالد سعيد
@Dorrkhaledsaeed
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,599subscribers
-1,207 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001373119789 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Dorrkhaledsaeed |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Dorrkhaledsaeed |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 16:58 | 11,599 | -37 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:56 | 11,636 | -32 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 03:37 | 11,668 | -30 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 13:19 | 11,698 | -66 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 15:40 | 11,764 | -53 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 04:41 | 11,817 | -41 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 22:40 | 11,858 | -31 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 21:38 | 11,889 | -33 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:09 | 11,922 | -20 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:55 | 11,942 | -11 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:27 | 11,953 | -12 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:59 | 11,965 | -22 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:25 | 11,987 | -44 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:23 | 12,031 | -17 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 12,048 | -17 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 12,065 | -41 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 12,106 | -19 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 12,125 | -43 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:37 | 12,168 | -47 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:36 | 12,215 | first reading |
Engagement
37 posts held, back to 22 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.79%
- avg views ÷ 11,599 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 556
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 37 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 37 (22 June 2026 – 26 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,111 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 23:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 0s
- Average length
- 0s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Sticker, posted without a caption
والشعراء يتبعهم الغاوون ذلك أن بعضهم ربما هجى واستطال في عرض من تراب نعليه خير منه ومن آبائه وأجداده، ثم لعله استدار فمدح وتمسح بعدما ذم وقدح. صدق الله وكذب قول أخيك 🔘https://t.me/Dorrkhaledsaeed
Sticker, posted without a caption
غياب القوامة بين الهجام والجلاد لفت نظري في هوجة "نظام الطيبات" التي ضربت الواقع الحقيقي والواقع الموازي أو "السوشيال ميديا"، إقبال كثير من السيدات على هذا النظام، وكنت قد علقت بهذا الخصوص تعليقاً عابراً واعتبره البعض مسيئاً أو منتقصاً من النساء! والحقيقة أن الأمر ليس كذلك على الإطلاق، فلا أُكن تحقيراً لا سمح الله للنساء ومنهن فضليات كثر وهن بناتنا وأخواتنا وزوجاتنا، وقبل كل أولئك كن أمهاتنا رحم الله من ماتت منهن …
Sticker, posted without a caption
هزيمة العلمانية في بلادنا مازالت العلمانية الهشة في مصر تعلن هزيمتها كل يوم بظهيرها العسكري؛ فمازال يقلقها ويدفعها إلى الصراخ منظر امرأة مسلمة واحدة قامت إلى الصلاة! امرأة واحدة تؤدي فريضة بسيطة في بضع دقائق، ليست جيشاً من الرجال ولا مدججاً بالسلاح، حقاً لقد صدقت رموزكم -من حيث هي كاذبة أصلاً- حين اعتبرت أن من أسمتهم "بالإخوان" متغلغلين في مفاصل ما أسموها "بالدولة"، والحقيقة أنه هو الإسلام نفسه من حيث لا يشعرون! أ…
Sticker, posted without a caption
الأخ الباحث الفذ والمحلل الرصين م. أحمد مولانا يقدم محتوى معلوماتي وتثقيفي وتوعوي وتحليلي متميز لا يكاد يطرح مثله في الواقع الإسلامي خصوصاً، والواقع العربي بشكل عام، بل وألفت أنظار الإعلام العالمي. أنصح الجميع بمتابعته والإفادة منه. 📌رابط قناة م/ أحمد مولانا : https://t.me/AhmedMawlana #خالد_سعيد
أتناول في الحلقة ملف تناقص مخزونات الصواريخ الأمريكية، والأسباب التي أدت لتراجع القدرات الصناعية العسكرية الأمريكية، رغم أن الولايات المتحدة تملك أقوى اقتصاد وأحدث جيش عالميا. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wHVOjAUaWCQ
Sticker, posted without a caption
يسألونك عن الزلازل دخلت مصر حزام الزلازل بالفعل من قبل زلزال 1992 ولكن بدرجات غير محسوسة، إذ من سنة الله في تقدير قوانين الكون التدرج، وبسبب شدة الزلزال في ذلك العام وعدم وجود ثقافة وقوانين الزلازل في مصر كدولة قبل ذلك التاريخ؛ تضررت كثير من البيوت القديمة والبنية التحتية وكانت النتائج مؤسفة. فهل يعني هذا أن نتوقع ازدياد وتيرة الزلازل وشدتها! وهل لسلسلة الزلازل من تركيا إلى مصر مروراً بسوريا وانتهاء بالمغرب؛ أسبابا…
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @Dorrkhaledsaeed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Dorrkhaledsaeed edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 13 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 13 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@AhmedMawlana · 43,587
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 August 2026
@melhamy · 104,107
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 August 2026
@drwasfy · 30,590
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
@BnSamyPosts · 62,797
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 August 2026
@Ayman_Abdulraheem · 64,943
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 August 2026
@Ahmedmansouraja · 98,689
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 August 2026
@alkhattabirw · 44,248
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 August 2026
@rsjlb · 47,086
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026
@k_owais · 31,988
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 September 2026
@anbaaturkiye · 33,682
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 3 September 2026
@RassdNewsN · 48,865
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 26 August 2026
@ArabAffairsTV · 60,577
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 August 2026
@NORSFS2 · 111,148
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
@audiobooking2 · 40,611
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 August 2026
@WhereIsTheRoad · 27,485
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 September 2026
@basemelewa · 30,017
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
@arabicpost_me · 25,041
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 September 2026
@MeemMagazine · 30,621
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 6 September 2026
@Zra3Awy · 66,914
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 21 August 2026
@al_sabeel · 24,008
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 September 2026
@almalwalamal · 29,893
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“د.خالد سعيد” (@Dorrkhaledsaeed), 11,599 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dorrkhaledsaeed.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.