Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
30 measurements spanning 35 days, net -279. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,217–21,580 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Sept 2026, 05:41
21,259
-10
7 Sept 2026, 02:18
21,269
-32
4 Sept 2026, 08:18
21,301
-8
2 Sept 2026, 18:55
21,309
-10
1 Sept 2026, 19:47
21,319
+5
31 Aug 2026, 16:13
21,314
+5
30 Aug 2026, 18:04
21,309
+2
29 Aug 2026, 20:43
21,307
+13
28 Aug 2026, 19:49
21,294
-6
27 Aug 2026, 21:48
21,300
-6
26 Aug 2026, 19:13
21,306
-10
25 Aug 2026, 20:52
21,316
-15
24 Aug 2026, 20:26
21,331
-9
23 Aug 2026, 08:53
21,340
-15
21 Aug 2026, 20:07
21,355
-9
20 Aug 2026, 16:37
21,364
-9
19 Aug 2026, 13:13
21,373
-16
18 Aug 2026, 12:33
21,389
-8
17 Aug 2026, 09:48
21,397
-10
15 Aug 2026, 16:38
21,407
first reading
Engagement
41 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
26.3%
avg views ÷ 21,259 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,580
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.90%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 41 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
41 (24 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
94,880
Reactions total
2,752
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 16:54 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
26m 30s
Average length
1m 54s
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,019 reactions across 39 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
6,460
80.6%
👍
993
12.4%
💯
236
2.94%
💔
132
1.65%
😢
90
1.12%
🥰
57
0.711%
😭
32
0.399%
👌
15
0.187%
🙏
4
0.05%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,898 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
إعلان مهم حول الدورة:
حتى لا يتكرر التأجيل يا طيبين ويا طيبات..وقد أخبرني الطبيب أن وضع ابني يحتاج إلى عدة أيام ..
وقد شاركته أخته المرض-ولله الحمد—فقد تقرر تأجيل الدورة إلى الأسبوع القادم
يوم الثلاثاء 9/8.. وسيكون هناك إضافات جديدة مفيدة للدورة بسب التأجيل بإذن الله..أعتذر مرة أخرى..والخيرة فيما اختاره الله..
ليس هناك أجمل ولا أسعد في هذه الحياة من أن تعظم الله سبحانه وتعالى في قلوب عباده !
ليس هناك أجمل من أن تنفض الغبار عن فطرة الناس وتهز قلوبهم بكلام الوحي فترى ينابيع الخير تنبثق منها..
كم من شخص يبدو صعب الهداية، ولو مات على ما هو عليه فبئس المصير ينتظره..لكن بكلمات قليلة ينقذه الله تعالى برحمته وكرمه..
هؤلاء المعلقون جميعاً وغيرهم ممن تاب وأناب: أسأل الله أن يغفر لكم ما مضى ويثبتكم على الإيمان ويجعلكم داعين إلى تعظيم…
أخيرا دورة:
"شيفرة التدبر"
كيف أنتقل من قراءة القرآن الكريم..إلى العيش معه!
بخطوات علمية..وعملية..
مع تطبيق تدريبي أثناء الدورة..
ثلاثة أيام-مبدئيا-تبدأ يوم الثلاثاء بإذن الله..
الساعة التاسعة والنصف بتوقيت مكة المكرمة..
مدة اللقاء: من نصف ساعة إلى ساعة..
هناك اختبار في الدورة..
حتى هذه اللحظة..الدورة مجانية..بشرط الهمة والجدية..
غياب يوم واحد قد يعني انتهاء اشتراكك بالدورة.."يا يحيى خذ الكتاب بقوة"!
للذكور والإناث..…
أحسنتتم..
تقريبا..لا يوجد مقطع اقترحتموه في التعليقات وإلا وقد تم اقتطاعه ونشره..سواء أكان الاقتطاع من قبل فريق الدكتور إياد القنيبي والمهندس أيمن عبلي أو من قبل غيرهم..
فتقبل الله منا ومنك صالح الأعمال وكتبها لنا جميعا في الحسنات الجارية..
واصلوا..
#تعظيم_الرب_والدين
تعالوا نخرج من دوامة هذه الحياة ونتعلق بحقائق الآخرة، حيث السعادة او الشقاء..إلى ما لا نهاية !
#تعظيم_الرب_والدين
https://youtube.com/shorts/JHETxaI2_Po?si=NYxupJTD9o0kPPRc
هل هكذا يعظم الله ودينه؟أم هي مواجهة للحملة المباركة؟!
بجرة قلم..يصبح القول الذي اتفقت عليه جماهير العلماء ..ومنها المذاهب الاربعة.."اعتقاد خاطئ"!!
وتصبح "لحظة الانفعال" من موانع الردة..ولو كانت نتيجة هذا الانفعال سب الرب والدين!
حملات مباركة لتعظيم الرب والدين ومكافحة جريمة التطاول على الذات المقدسة والدين..ويتفاعل الناس معها بشكل طيب..ومن أكثر من دولة-ولله الحمد-ثم تأتي هذه الفتوى المدلسة التي ما أنزل الله بها من س…
غسان كنفاني:عزيزتي غادة..يلعن ديـ@@!!
لم تكن القضية الفلسطينية هي السبب..حاشا
بل التعامل الخاطئ معها من قبل البعض بعيدا عن نور الإسلام هو السبب
#تعظيم_الرب_والدين
شتم الرب لأنه وقع في بلاء أو مشكلة!!
#تعظيم_الرب_والدين
❤141💯26👍10😢7
Signed الدكتور أيمن خليل البلوي
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @balawi5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
د. سامي عامري @Dr_Sami_Ameri · 29,190 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
صوتيات د. خالد أبوشادي 🔊 @khaledabushadii · 35,705 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
خالد أبوشادي @khaledabushadi · 29,198 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
خالد حمدي @k_owais · 32,046 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 September 2026
د. إياد قنيبي @EyadQunaibi · 223,412 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 August 2026
قناة حسن الحسيني @husaini76 · 96,323 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
شؤون إسلامية - Islamic Affairs @ArabAffairsTV · 60,676 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 August 2026
جهاد حلس @jhelles · 89,366 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 August 2026
قناة تسنيم راجح @TassneemRajehChannel · 41,865 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 29 August 2026
دروس أونلاين @droosonline4u · 97,820 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 August 2026
Syrian Youth Assembly - SYA @syryouth · 82,995 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 22 August 2026
درع الأمة @UmahShield · 29,997 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
Mohammed ElGhaleez @moh_elghaleez · 125,014 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 13 August 2026
النفس المطمئنة @alnafsalmutmaena · 55,323 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 August 2026
قناة: محمد إلهامي @melhamy · 104,346 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 August 2026
د/ حازم شومان "قناة رسمية" @drhazemshouman · 263,856 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026
على مُكث | أحمد السيد @alamukth · 57,749 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 23 August 2026
درر الشيخ الطريفي @Altarefedrr · 45,901 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
درر الشيخ السكران @Alsakrandrr · 33,045 Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
المصطفى من الفوائد والسير @turaath_ah · 32,300 Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الدكتور أيمن خليل البلوي” (@balawi5), 21,259 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/balawi5.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.