Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
56 measurements spanning 91 days, net -261. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,823–16,162 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 56
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 11:24
15,862
-6
4 Nov 2026, 08:39
15,868
-5
3 Nov 2026, 10:20
15,873
-3
2 Nov 2026, 07:26
15,876
-4
1 Nov 2026, 07:05
15,880
-8
31 Oct 2026, 04:56
15,888
-2
30 Oct 2026, 07:34
15,890
-7
29 Oct 2026, 05:07
15,897
-6
28 Oct 2026, 01:47
15,903
+5
27 Oct 2026, 01:40
15,898
-7
25 Oct 2026, 02:07
15,905
-2
24 Oct 2026, 01:38
15,907
-6
23 Oct 2026, 01:49
15,913
-1
21 Oct 2026, 22:31
15,914
-4
19 Oct 2026, 17:45
15,918
-2
18 Oct 2026, 14:58
15,920
-7
17 Oct 2026, 15:48
15,927
-4
16 Oct 2026, 12:45
15,931
-4
15 Oct 2026, 13:28
15,935
-9
14 Oct 2026, 16:41
15,944
first reading
Engagement
30 posts held, back to 3 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.0%
avg views ÷ 15,862 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,010
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 30 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 October 2026
Posts held
30 (3 April 2026 – 24 October 2026)
Views total
6,020
Reactions total
221
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 05:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
270
Videos
123
Links
136
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
3,671 reactions across 30 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,702
73.6%
👍
387
10.5%
💔
247
6.73%
👏
179
4.88%
😢
136
3.70%
🤩
20
0.545%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,671 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 3 April 2026 to 24 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 2 posts held from the last 30 days (50.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
استضافة جديدة كرّمني بها الحبيب شعيب لنناقش مساحة أخرى من مساحات تغول علم النفس في حياتنا اليومية وهي مساحة "تربية الأبناء".
وأقارن في هذه الحلقة بين بعض مفاهيم وجوانب التربية القرآنية والتربية النبوية للأبناء والبنات وبين التربية الغربية أو الحديثة أو أيا ما كان مسماها.
مشاهدة مفيدة.
https://youtu.be/43x8qXofURM
(والفتاح: من أسماء الله تعالى، ومعناه: الذي لا يُغلِقُ وجوهَ النعم بالعصيان، ولا يترك إيصالَ الرحمة بالنسيان،
والذي فتح على النفوس بابَ توفيقهِ، وعلى القلوبِ باب تحقيقه،
والذي يفتح بعنايتهِ كُلَّ مقفل، ويكشف بهدايتهِ ما أُشكل).
الشيخ عبد الباسط بن محمد البلقيني ، في كتابه الوفا بشرح الاصطفا في أسماء المصطفى ﷺ
السلام عليكم،
نأسف لازعاجكم سننتقل لقناة جديدة، لظروف تقنية خارجة عن الإرادة. وسيجري حذف هذه القناة.
شكرا لاهتمامكم بهذا الأمر.
رابط القناة الجديدة:
https://t.me/tareqkhamees
الناس بتتكلم عن المشاهير اللي بيتحولو لـ"سماسرة" مع شركات الحج لأنهم بيسلعوا الدين
والإنكار دا مطلوب وحسن
لكن لو هنتكلم عن التكسب بالدين فهناك نقطة قليلا ما أسمع حد بيتكلم فيها وهو أن كتير من المتصدرين ف مساحة علم النفس الإسلامي والكوتشنج الإسلامي هم حرفيا بيتكسبو بالدين، حرفيا دون مجاز
يعني مثلا ما معنى أن واحدة تعمل محاضرة عن الاستعداد لرمضان بعنوان روحانيات رمضان بمبلغ وقدره؟ .. ماحنا طول عمرنا بنسمع مشايخ وبنحضر…
شرفني الأخ والصديق العزيز Anass Hamdi بهذه الاستضافة العفوية والتي ناقشنا فيها استنزافنا في العالم الرقمي ثم تحدثنا حول توجيهات النبي ﷺ للصحابة في بعض المواقف والسلوكيات، وكيف يمكننا أن نقتدي بهذا الجيل في ترشيد أفكارنا ومشاعرنا في هذه الأوقات.
مشاهدة مفيدة
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dn0e6j77oJE
سؤال يا كرام:
في دورة (علم التزكية أم علم النفس) التي سأنشرها قريبا إن شاء الله ، ربما تصل السلسلة إلى 20 حلقة، وكل حلقة ساعة تقريبا
كل أربع حلقات تتناول موضوع واحد تقريبا ، فسؤالي هو: هل الأفضل أن تُنشر السلسلة على يوتيوب كلها في Playlist واحدة (20 حلقة مثلا) أم الأفضل تقسيمها إلى Playlists مختلفة؟
التعليقات مفتوحة
إحدى مضار المصطلحات النفسية الشعبوية أنها تجعل المسلم مغتربًا عن القرآن والسنة ومنفصلًا عن تراثه.
التوتر النفسي - الضغط النفسي - المعاناة النفسية - الاحتراق النفسي - الخ .. كل هذه المصطلحات إذا استخدمها المسلم لوصف مشاعره فإنه إذا فتح القرآن ودواوين السنة فلن يجد وصفًا لها ولا علاجًا لها.
وبالتالي سيضطر للبحث عن تحليل لتلك المشاعر و "علاج" لها من "المختصين" النفسيين وليس من القرآن والسنة ولا من علم التزكية.
بل أنه…
قال رجلٌ لبشر بن الحارث الحافي: قد أضرني الفقر والعيال، فادعُ الله لي!
فقال له بشر: (إذا قال لك عيالك: "ليس عندنا خبز ولا دقيق، ونحن جياع!" فادعُ الله لي أنت ذلك الوقت، فإن دعاءك أفضل من دعائي).
شرفني الإخوة في منصة نوافذ بهذه الاستضافة في هذه الحلقة، التي ناقشنا فيها موضوع توسع علم النفس خارج حدوده العيادية، وما هي الأضرار التي سببها لنا..
وتناقشنا حول أضرار المصطلحات النفسية، وكيف طغى الخطاب النفسي على فهم الدين الإسلامي نفسه، وماذا خسرنا عندما تخلينا عن الشريعة وتشبثنا بالخطاب النفسي.
وكيف يمكن لخطاب الشريعة والتزكية والآداب الشرعية ونحو ذلك أن يصنع لنا منهاجًا وشرعة تعدّل لنا سلوكياتنا ومشاعرنا وأزماتن…
بفضل الله وتوفيقه، ناقشت اليوم رسالة الماجستير باللغة الإنجليزية في تخصص علم الاجتماع بجامعة ابن خلدون ، وكان عنوانها :
"صعود ثقافة العلاج النفسي في مصر : دراسة نوعية لطلاب وخريجي جامعتي القاهرة والإسكندرية"
THE RISE OF THERAPEUTIC CULTURE IN EGYPT: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF CAIRO AND ALEXANDRIA UNIVERSITIES STUDENTS AND GRADUATES
وهي أول دراسة سوسيولوجية من نوعها في مصر والعالم العربي، حيث استكشفت ظاهرة تغول علم الن…
❤269👏50👍18
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @ismail_arafa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
مُدونتي - مخيمر @Mudawanti · 37,553 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 31 August 2026
Metras - متراس @metrasweb · 21,346 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 September 2026
أحمد مولانا @AhmedMawlana · 43,609 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 August 2026
BnSamy @BnSamyPosts · 62,358 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 August 2026
أحمد قنيطة @a2qanita1 · 21,483 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 22 September 2026
أحمد عبد المنصف @abdelmonsef · 20,257 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 September 2026
دروس أونلاين @droosonline4u · 96,456 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 August 2026
الدكتور أيمن خليل البلوي @balawi5 · 20,927 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 September 2026
خالد حمدي @k_owais · 31,518 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 September 2026
السبيل @al_sabeel · 23,942 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 September 2026
Basem Elewa-باسم عليوة @basemelewa · 29,881 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
قناة شريف علي @Sherif_Aly · 88,732 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 17 August 2026
قناة تسنيم راجح @TassneemRajehChannel · 41,866 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 29 August 2026
Eduhub21.com @eduhub_21 · 53,799 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 23 August 2026
قناة د. محمد علي يوسف @mohamadaliyousef · 19,216 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 October 2026
رواسخ @Rawasekh · 31,572 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 September 2026
قناة: خالد بهاء الدين @Kbahaa · 23,602 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 17 September 2026
Ramzy Abdelaziz - رمزي عبدالعزيز @ramzyabdelaziz · 103,087 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
Emad Rashad Osman @emadrashadosman · 54,842 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 24 August 2026
قناة جيل يقرأ @ReadTube · 28,841 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 9 September 2026
د. سامي عامري @Dr_Sami_Ameri · 29,347 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
أَفْلَحَ @Aflh_1 · 18,808 Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 3 October 2026
العمل من المنزل - Working From Home @workremotelyfreelance · 64,517 Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 September 2026
لطفي أحمد الطوخي🔻 @LotfiELtokhi · 24,915 Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 32 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“إسماعيل عرفة” (@ismail_arafa), 15,862 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ismail_arafa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.