Channel
@Altarefedrr
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
45,660subscribers
-338 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001068087965 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Altarefedrr |
| Description | إحدى قنوات مشروع المنار الهادي، تهدف لرصف ونضد نفائس وفرائد الشيخ عبد العزيز الطريفي المكتوبة والمسموعة والمرئية. - للتواصل مع المشروع: @almnaralhady_bot |
| Created | 3 June 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 39 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Altarefedrr |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @Altarefedrr/12351 · this entry23 Jul 2026, 10:01 UTC | @Basmatkhayrr/7388523 Jul 2026, 13:01 UTC | 0.99 | 3.0 hours |
| @Altarefedrr/12337 · this entry19 Jul 2026, 10:03 UTC | @Basmatkhayrr/7375219 Jul 2026, 19:34 UTC | 0.99 | 9.5 hours |
| @Altarefedrr/12343 · this entry21 Jul 2026, 10:05 UTC | @Basmatkhayrr/7383122 Jul 2026, 05:11 UTC | 0.96 | 19 hours |
| @Altarefedrr/12342 · this entry21 Jul 2026, 04:01 UTC | @Basmatkhayrr/7383022 Jul 2026, 05:11 UTC | 0.95 | 25 hours |
| @Altarefedrr/12336 · this entry19 Jul 2026, 04:04 UTC | @Basmatkhayrr/7375119 Jul 2026, 19:33 UTC | 0.94 | 15 hours |
| @Altarefedrr/12339 · this entry20 Jul 2026, 04:01 UTC | @Basmatkhayrr/7378020 Jul 2026, 14:40 UTC | 0.88 | 11 hours |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @Basmatkhayrr | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.95 | 13 hours | this entry (6–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 14 comparable posts for this entry, running 18 July 2026 to 28 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @Altarefedrr — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 6 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 16:01 | 45,660 | -75 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 17:37 | 45,735 | -63 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 18:20 | 45,798 | -26 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 17:38 | 45,824 | -15 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 45,839 | -25 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:38 | 45,864 | -7 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:01 | 45,871 | -14 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:36 | 45,885 | -16 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 01:38 | 45,901 | -25 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 20:20 | 45,926 | +10 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 21:38 | 45,916 | -13 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:44 | 45,929 | +10 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:04 | 45,919 | +10 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:26 | 45,909 | -16 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 45,925 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 45,931 | +17 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:07 | 45,914 | +44 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 45,870 | +52 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:14 | 45,818 | +32 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:24 | 45,786 | first reading |
39 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 135 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 39 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
•• كثيرًا ما يكونُ إيمانُ الإنسان بالله دعوًى؛ لمُنَافَاتِها لغَيْرِها! قال تعالى: ﴿وَمِنَ النّاسِ مَن يَقولُ آمَنّا بِاللَّهِ وَبِاليَومِ الآخِرِ وَما هُم بِمُؤمِنينَ﴾. فلا يستقيمُ دعوى تعظيمِ اللهِ تعالى، والنُّطْقُ بالشَّهادتَيْنِ، مع سَبِّه سبحانه وتعالى والاستهزاءِ به. - تعظيم الله تعالى وحكم شاتمه (صـ٣٠) •• ••┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈•• ✦ T.me/Altarefedrr
•• اكثر الناس خشية لله أكثرهم حظا من رحمة الله ومغفرته ﴿إِنَّ الَّذِينَ يَخْشَوْنَ رَبَّهُم بِالْغَيْبِ لَهُم مَّغْفِرَةٌ وَأَجْرٌ كَبِيرٌ} الملك 12. •• ••┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈•• ✦ T.me/Altarefedrr
•• من تعظيم الله تعالى: تعظيم تدبيرِهِ وأوامِرِهِ ونواهِيهِ، والوقوفُ عندَها وامتِثَالُها، وعدمُ الخَوْضِ فيما لا عِلْمَ للإنسانِ به. ومِن تعظيم الله تعالى: ذكْرُهُ ودعاؤُهُ وسُؤَالُهُ، ورَبْطُ حوادِثِ الكون بِهِ وحدَهُ، فهو خالِقُها ومُدَبِّرُها لا شريك له؛ قال الله تعالى: ﴿وَما قَدَرُوا اللَّهَ حَقَّ قَدرِهِ وَالأَرضُ جَميعًا قَبضَتُهُ يَومَ القِيامَةِ وَالسَّماواتُ مَطوِيّاتٌ بِيَمينِهِ سُبحانَهُ وَتَعالى عَمّا ي…
•• اغترار الإنسان بعلمه المادي يورثه استكباراً عن الوحي، وما علمه إلا موهبة من الله { فَلَمَّا جَاءَتْهُمْ رُسُلُهُمْ بِالْبَيِّنَاتِ فَرِحُوا بِمَا عِنْدَهُمْ مِنَ الْعِلْمِ} غافر 83. •• ••┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈•• ✦ T.me/Altarefedrr
•• الكواكِبُ كالشمسِ والقمرِ، وآثارُهما كالليل والنهار والأزمِنَةِ، مُسَيَّرَةٌ لا مُخَيَّرَةٌ، لا تخرُجُ عن إِرادَةِ الله وحدَهُ، وليس لها مشيئةٌ ولا كسبٌ ولا اختِيَارٌ، ولا تُؤْمَرُ إلا بأمرٍ كوني، وليس لها الخروجُ عنهُ. فسَبُّها تعد على مُسيرها وآمِرِها سبحانَهُ، واعتِرَاضٌ على حِكْمَتِهِ وإرادَتِهِ فيها. ومن أجل هذا جَعَلَ الله تعالى سَبَّ الدَّهرِ سَبًا لَهُ بطريقِ اللزومِ! ولم يَجْعَلِ الله تعالى سَبَّ الإنسان…
•• منذ بدأت البشرية والإنسان كل يوم يتعلم جديدا يغتر بمساحة علمه لأنه يراه ولا يتواضع لمساحة جهله الذي لا ينتهي {وَمَا أُوتِيتُم مِّنَ الْعِلْمِ إِلَّا قَلِيلًا} 85 الإسراء. •• ••┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈•• ✦ T.me/Altarefedrr
Photo, posted without a caption
•• سَبُّ الله تعالى على نوعين: - الأَوَّلُ: سَبٌّ مباشِرٌ: كلعْنِهِ، وذَمِّهِ، والاستهزاء به، وتنقصه بذاتهِ سبحانه؛ فهذا يأْخُذُ الأحكام السابقَة جميعها، وهو المقصود عند إطلاق العلماء لأحكامِ سَبِّ الله تعالى. - الثاني: سَب غير مباشر: كسب ما يَتصَرَّفُ اللهُ به من آياته ومخلوقاته التي لا اختيار لها ولا كَسْبَ كاختيار الإنسان وكَسْبِهِ، وذلك كسَب الدهْرِ، والأيام، والسَّاعاتِ، واللحَظَات، والشُّهورِ، والأعوام، وال…
•• ما من علم يصله عقل الإنسان إلا وجعل الله البهائم تسبقه بذلك، وهي بلا عقل ليثبت ضعفه وأن كرامته عنهم بالدين، وإلا فطيور الرخم تطير قبل الطائرة. •• ••┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈•• ✦ T.me/Altarefedrr
•• هل يوجد في الدين بدعة حسنة؟ ••
•• من سَبَّ اللهَ -تبارك وتعالى- وَجَبَ قَتْلُهُ ولا يُستتابُ، وتوبَتُهُ إلى اللهِ يَلْقَاهُ بباطنِهِ، ويُعَاملُهُ اللهُ بعَدْلِهِ، أو عَفْوِهِ. ومن سَبَّ الله وتابَ وأظهَرَ توبَتَهُ قبل طَلَبِهِ والقُدْرَةِ عليهِ؛ قُبِلَتْ توبَتُهُ لظهورِ صدْقِهِ، فحُكْمُهُ كحُكْمِ الكُفَّارِ الذين دَخَلُوا الإسلامَ طواعِيَةً، ولو كانوا يُقِرُّونَ بسَبِّهِم للهِ قبل إسلامِهم. - تعظيم الله تعالى وحكم شاتمه (صـ٣٤) •• ••┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈…
•• الإنسان أخذ كثيرا من حضارته من مواهب البهائم كالطيران وغيره، وعدم الفصل بين علم الإيمان وعلم المادة يوجب تعظيم الغراب، فقد جعله الله معلما للبشر دفن الميت ومع ذلك سماه الله فويسقا بل أمر بقتله، قد يكون الإنسان بصيراً بالمادة أعمي في حق الله. •• ••┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈•• ✦ T.me/Altarefedrr
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @Altarefedrr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 42 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“درر الشيخ الطريفي” (@Altarefedrr), 45,660 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Altarefedrr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.