Voice message, posted without a caption
custom 596981057642195085488

Channel
@alkulife
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
49,001subscribers
-1,096 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001091852974 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alkulife |
| Description | القناة الرئيسية: t.me/alkulife قناة الدروس العلمية: t.me/doros_alkulify أسئلة عامة مع عبد الله الخليفي: t.me/swteat_k صوتيات الخليفي: t.me/swteat_alkulife تعزيز القناة : https://t.me/alkulife?boost |
| Created | 10 May 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alkulife |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 00:18 | 49,001 | +3 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 01:51 | 48,998 | -9 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 23:06 | 49,007 | -6 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 20:26 | 49,013 | -16 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 20:59 | 49,029 | -8 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 22:08 | 49,037 | -4 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 00:07 | 49,041 | -12 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 21:27 | 49,053 | -5 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 21:59 | 49,058 | -15 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 18:45 | 49,073 | +12 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 19:06 | 49,061 | -15 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 16:57 | 49,076 | +13 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 14:27 | 49,063 | -10 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 05:47 | 49,073 | -32 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 05:37 | 49,105 | -29 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 04:09 | 49,134 | -10 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 00:44 | 49,144 | -22 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 21:46 | 49,166 | -14 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 21:10 | 49,180 | -39 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 19:09 | 49,219 | first reading |
277 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 181 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 277 (28 July 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 489,700 |
| Reactions total | 13,700 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 12:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
48,392 reactions across 275 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5969810576421950854 | 48,392 | 100.0% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 277 of the 277 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48,713 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 277 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 15 of 82 posts held from the last 30 days (18.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Voice message, posted without a caption
custom 596981057642195085488
Voice message, posted without a caption
custom 596981057642195085491
Voice message, posted without a caption
custom 5969810576421950854100
التدجين باسم الرجولة ! 👇
custom 5969810576421950854109
هذا تعليق لمؤثر مشهور جداً في العالم العربي. وكثيرات صنفن تعليقه ذكورية وتطرفاً، وهو يشير إلى قصة تلك المرأة التي خرجت تتحسر على بيت الأحلام الذي أخذه زوجها مع أنه أعطاها كل حقوقها، وصارت القضية تراها في مكان والكل يشارك فيها، وخرج كثيرون ممن يعيش في أمريكا يقول أن الأصل في البيت نصفان بين الزوج والزوجة، وأن الحال الوحيد الذي يكون فيه الأمر أن يكون على البيت أقساط، وعرضوا عليها الدفع والمشاركة فاختارت أن ينفرد الزوج…
custom 5969810576421950854288
Voice message, posted without a caption
custom 5969810576421950854115
Voice message, posted without a caption
custom 5969810576421950854115
Voice message, posted without a caption
custom 5969810576421950854124
بين داود لمعي وهيثم طلعت واستحقاقية الأقليات 👇
custom 5969810576421950854124
هذه شركة محاماة كندية، كتب فيها محاميان هذا المقال عن ضرر الاتهامات الجنسية الكيدية، وأنها لا يمكن تداركها. جاء في مقالهم: "يمكن أن يكون للادعاءات الكاذبة بالاعتداء الجنسي تداعيات كبيرة في كندا، حيث يمكن أن تؤثر على الأفراد والمجتمع الأوسع. من المهم ملاحظة أن الادعاءات الكاذبة بالاعتداء الجنسي أصبحت شائعة بشكل متزايد، حيث تشير الدراسات إلى أن معدل التقارير الكاذبة مشابه إن لم يكن أعلى من معدل الجرائم الخطيرة الأخرى…
custom 5969810576421950854203
"لقد خذلتني النسوية وخذلت جيلي كله" ماذا تقصد؟ هل وعدتها النسوية بشيء؟ النسوية توهم النساء أن تدجين الرجال ممكن، وأنها بهذه الطريقة ستكسب أكبر قدر ممكن من المكاسب. فهي لا تريد الاستغناء عن الزوج والأطفال، ولكن تريد حياة أسرية بحسب مقاييس خيالية في ذهنها. ولو كانت تعرف أن هذا مجرد خيال لانسحبت وآثرت الواقعية على الخيال. لذا في كل مجتمع ترتبط شراسة النسوية بمستوى تقبل الرجال للتدجين، فكلما قبلوا أكثر طالبت بالمزي…
custom 5969810576421950854313
Voice message, posted without a caption
custom 5969810576421950854121
Showing the 12 most recent of 277 posts we hold for @alkulife. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@alkulife edited 19 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 92 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 38 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 22 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 78 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة | أبي جعفر عبدالله الخليفي” (@alkulife), 49,001 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alkulife.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.