Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
السنة الواضحة
@sunnahwadeha
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,102subscribers
+346 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001325228840 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sunnahwadeha |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 24 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sunnahwadeha |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 15:18 | 9,102 | +57 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 06:18 | 9,045 | +36 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 00:19 | 9,009 | +53 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 01:59 | 8,956 | +70 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:29 | 8,886 | +78 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:22 | 8,808 | +4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 8,804 | no change |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 8,804 | +21 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:18 | 8,783 | +14 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:07 | 8,769 | +7 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:13 | 8,762 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 8,760 | +9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 8,751 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:38 | 8,756 | first reading |
Engagement
48 posts held, back to 16 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.81%
- avg views ÷ 9,102 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 711
- 34 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 43
- of 48 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 48 (16 August 2026 – 27 August 2026) |
| Views total | 24,167 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
السنة الواضحة pinned a photo
مسند الإمام أحمد (53) الدرس الثالث والخمسون مسانيد المكثرين مسند أنس بن مالك (١٢٢٠١ ـ ١٢٤١٢) الأحاديث{12201 ـ 12412}
عن حنبل قال سمعت ابا عبد الله يقول واكره السواد لان النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم يقول وجنبوه السواد " الوقوف والترجل 138
سنن الدارمي - 2810 حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ الْفَضْلِ ، وَسُلَيْمَانُ بْنُ حَرْبٍ , قَالَا : حَدَّثَنَا حَمَّادٌ هُوَ : ابْنُ زَيْدٍ ، قَالَ : حَدَّثَنَا أَيُّوبُ ، عَنْ حُمَيْدِ بْنِ هِلَالٍ ، عَنْ عُبَادَةَ بْنِ قُرْطٍ ، قَالَ : " إِنَّكُمْ لَتَأْتُونَ أُمُورًا هِيَ أَدَقُّ فِي أَعْيُنِكُمْ مِنَ الشَّعْرِ ، كُنَّا نَعُدُّهَا عَلَى عَهْدِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ مِنْ الْمُوبِقَاتِ " …
التلجرام ما زال فيه مشكله؛ لذا يقطع كثير من يستطيع فلينضم عبر قوقل ميت الصوت بحمد الله واضح
File, posted without a caption
الحديث ١٢٢٠١ ( طبعة دار التأصيل)
Sticker, posted without a caption
🎙البث ذاته على المنصتين حياكم الله 💬 لا تغفلوا عن الصلاة على النبي ﷺ
https://meet.google.com/nhe-wywz-awh
https://t.me/sunnahwadeha?livestream
Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @sunnahwadeha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@sunnahwadeha edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 26 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 28 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
بداية الدرس
- الساعة 935%
- الساعة 9:3066%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 16 August 2026 to 27 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@mahedsunnah · 7,8238 postsقطوف [ السنة الواضحة ]
@Al_asmii · 8964 postsقناة|| أبـي خـالد الهـاشـمي
@Enemy_of_Asharis · 3093 postsأَبُو خُزَيْمَةَ مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ ضِيَاءِ الدِّينِ
@m14m1 · 4173 postsتفسير مقاتل بن سليمان
@tafseer_mg · 9843 postsبَصَائِر.
@Insights_09 · 1691 postكَفى بالمَوتِ واعِظًا
@QOcqgFAoG281YmY8 · 271 postكناشة || أحمد
@ahmed0x · 91 postقمْ معي لله نمضي
@bsm_allah9 · 671 postقناة | ابو إيّاد
@eiad79 · 931 postالتأطير العام
@ettar_aam · 1321 postقناة أبي عبدالله حمد المهوّس
@hamed_almohawes · 2371 postرَحِيــقُ التَّأصِــيل
@rahegtaseel · 6221 postالغَيْرَةُ والحِرْصُ عَلَىٰ النِّسَاء
@rujola515 · 1,2701 postمُلتقى السُّنيّـات للنساء
@salaffsalehhh · 1,2471 postعلى نهج السلف بإذن الله
@sshjjkkjji · 181 postالجواب السدید للشبهات حول التوحید
@towhi_d · 5901 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@salaftime · 30,563
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
@shweier1 · 28,575
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
@MShmsDin · 23,358
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 September 2026
@alosimichannel · 24,302
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 September 2026
@AbuNibrase_and_Namuse · 53,868
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 September 2026
@qasas2 · 29,562
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 8 September 2026
@Ruqyah011 · 23,879
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 September 2026
@alkulife · 49,568
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 25 August 2026
@TheIslamicProphet · 55,453
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
@lmakitat · 30,756
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
@aqleeatpages · 53,748
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 September 2026
@rabbatulkhodor · 26,935
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 September 2026
@Archive_Makany_World · 43,790
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
@dross_dross · 26,739
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 September 2026
@archive_makany · 28,099
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 September 2026
@makanyworld · 188,208
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026
@Dralshwiar12 · 33,638
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“السنة الواضحة” (@sunnahwadeha), 9,102 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sunnahwadeha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.