قناة متخصصة في تسليط الضوء على خطر الآلة الإعلامية العالمية ودورها في تشويه عقائد الناس وإضعاف النفوس من منظور نفسي وعقدي
«لا نتبع أي جهة أو حزب أو جماعة أو تنظيم»
رابط القناة على اليوتيوب 👇🏻
https://youtube.com/@aqalmn3
Created
13 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
57 measurements spanning 92 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,090–10,275 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 07:36
10,134
-8
5 Nov 2026, 09:40
10,142
-6
4 Nov 2026, 07:07
10,148
+2
3 Nov 2026, 08:45
10,146
-3
2 Nov 2026, 11:06
10,149
-9
1 Nov 2026, 08:16
10,158
-9
30 Oct 2026, 07:56
10,167
-2
29 Oct 2026, 04:18
10,169
+5
26 Oct 2026, 21:27
10,164
+3
26 Oct 2026, 00:27
10,161
-6
25 Oct 2026, 00:09
10,167
-2
22 Oct 2026, 23:36
10,169
-1
21 Oct 2026, 21:46
10,170
-4
20 Oct 2026, 14:56
10,174
+2
19 Oct 2026, 11:27
10,172
-2
18 Oct 2026, 13:28
10,174
+3
17 Oct 2026, 16:40
10,171
-2
16 Oct 2026, 17:44
10,173
-3
15 Oct 2026, 17:59
10,176
-8
13 Oct 2026, 04:06
10,184
first reading
Engagement
40 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
26.4%
avg views ÷ 10,134 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,680
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
11
of 40 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held
40 (19 July 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total
29,446
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 08:56 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
887
Videos
291
Links
616
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
7m 17s
Average length
40s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 11 posts held from the last 30 days (18.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
السلام عليكم
هذه مناشدة من أخت من مصر وصلتني على الخاص :
تقول الأخت :
((أنا فتاة في العشرينيات من عمري، أعول أسرة مكوّنة من خمسة أفراد، بعد انفصال والديّ منذ سنوات طويلة، ولا أعلم عن أبي شيئًا.
تحمّلت أمي مسؤوليتنا وبذلت من أجلنا الكثير، حتى أثقلها المرض وأصبحت عاجزة عن العمل، فاضطررت إلى العمل في سنّ مبكرة لأعين أسرتي وأتحمّل مسؤولياتها.
ومنذ ثلاث سنوات، تعرّضت أختي الصغرى لحادث أسفر عن كسور في العمود الفقري وال…
تخيل أنك في زيارة إلى بيت صديقك الهندوسي، إذ به يقول:
ها، تشرب الشاي أم القهوة؟
فماذا سيكون اختيارك حينئذ؟
في هذا المثال البسيط، قد مارس صديقك أسلوبا يسمى بالتأطير، إذ جعل الخياراتِ المتاحةَ أمامك محدودةً محصورة، فلن يخطر في بالك العصيرُ أو الحليبُ مثلا، إما أن تختار الشاي، وإما القهوة، لا خيار ثالث، لأن هذه هي الخيارات المتاحة أمامك.
تغدو هذه الحيلة في غاية الخطورة عندما تمارس على نطاق جماهيري واسع، فتتغير العقائ…
(اقتصصنا من مسيحيي الكرك!!)
ما حصل البارحة هو نتيجة حتمية لممارسات التضييق على أهم مكوّن فكري للمجتمع الأردني خلال السنوات الماضية،
إذ لا يمكنك مخاطبة أصحاب الغلو والإفراط بخطابات أصحاب الطناجر ورقاصي الموالد، فهؤلاء لا لغة مشتركة بينهم وبين القوم، بل هم "لا شيء" في أعين أصحاب الغلو.
كما أنك لا يمكنك الكلام معهم بلغة الأحزاب وأصحاب مشاريع الإسلام السياسي التافهة، التي أثبتت فشلها مرة بعد مرة،
فضلا عن لغة غلمان بن…
[شرف لا يليق بكم]
▫️ إنك إن علمت أن إطعام الطعام من خير الأعمال في الإسلام،
عن عبد الله بن عمرو بن العاص رضي الله عنهما أن رجلا سأل رسول الله ﷺ: أي الإسلام خير؟ قال: "تطعم الطعام وتقرأ السلام على من عرفت ومن لم تعرف" (متفق عليه).
▫️ وأنه من أحب الأعمال إلى الله تعالى،
قال ﷺ: "أحب الأعمال إلى الله سرور تدخله على مسلم، أو تكشف عنه كربة، أو تطرد عنه جوعا، أو تقضي عنه دينا" (صحيح الجامع).
▫️ وإذا ما علمت - يا رعاك ا…
❗️ عند الرد على المتبرجة التي تنتقد النقاب، لا يصح القول: "كما أن لك الحرية في تبرجك ونزع ملابسك، فلها الحرية في ارتداء النقاب."
بل يجب أن يُقال:
«تبرجك خطأ بلا شك، والنقاب اختيار صائب بلا شك»
ويُقال أيضا:
«أنت بتبرجك ترتكبين محرّما وكبيرة من الكبائر وتجاهرين بالمعصية وتصرين عليها فأنتِ آثمة بلا شك بل هذا موجب لفسقك، والمنتقبة فاعلة لشعيرة عظيمة تؤجر عليها، وتُرفَع درجتها في الدنيا والآخرة»
💡 لا ينبغي تصوير النقاب…
ابن تيمية يدعو إلى الرجوع لكتب العقائد المُسندة إلى السلف ويحيل عليها.
قال شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية:
"وأما أقوال السلف وعلماء الإسلام في هذا الأصل، وما في ذلك من نصوص الكتاب والسنة فهذا أعظم من أن يسعه هذا الشرح، ومن كتب التفسير المنقولة عن السلف مثل تفسير عبد الرزاق، وعبد بن حميد، وأحمد بن حنبل، وإسحاق بن راهويه ....
وكذلك الكتب المصنفة في السنة والرد على الجهمية وأصول الدين المنقولة عن السلف؛ مثل:
كتاب «الرد على ال…
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @aqalmn3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
ماذا فعلوا حتى وصفهم الله بهذا الوصف؟
(لقَدْ جِئْتُمْ شَيْئًا إِدًّا (89) تَكَادُ السَّمَاوَاتُ يَتَفَطَّرْنَ مِنْهُ وَتَنشَقُّ الْأَرْضُ وَتَخِرُّ الْجِبَالُ هَدًّا)
احتلوا فلسطين وقتلوا أهلها وهدموا بيوتهم1%
اغتصبوا طفلة ثم قتلوها1%
زعموا أن لله -سبحانه- ولد99%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 2 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@aqalmn3 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@drangari named in 7 posts, 8 August 2026 – 24 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
رحلة نفس @JourneyOfaPsych · 21,795 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
Creatures مَخلوقَاتٌ @Creatures0 · 40,754 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
القناة الرسمية الخاصة بالدكتور / عبدالرحمن منصور @Sh3bdelrhmanmnsour · 31,318 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 6 September 2026
مقتطفات فقه النفس | قناة غير رسمية @Archive_Makany_World · 43,530 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
فقه النفس / مكاني @makanyworld · 186,747 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026
فقه النفس - تفريغات وصوتيات @archive_makany · 27,870 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 September 2026
فقه النفس / مكاني - إعلانات @makanyworldads · 36,159 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
د.نور النومان | استشارية تربوية ونفسية. @PsychologistNourNouman · 24,388 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 September 2026
ربَّاتُ الخُدور @rabbatulkhodor · 26,637 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 September 2026
النفس المطمئنة @alnafsalmutmaena · 57,119 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 August 2026
Zad Academy - برنامج أكاديمية زاد @Zad_Academy_p · 47,310 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 August 2026
فِقْهُ الطَّبِيب"ما لا يسَعُ المسلم الطبيب جهله" @fiqh_altabib · 96,415 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 August 2026
الماكثات في البيوت @lmakitat · 30,413 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
ضبطُ الأُنوثة 🌸 @dhadt_alonnoutha · 44,199 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 August 2026
الموسوعة القرآنية @QuranPediaApp · 29,545 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
الدكتور هيثم طلعت @ht90hh · 21,912 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 September 2026
قناة تسنيم راجح @TassneemRajehChannel · 41,866 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 29 August 2026
واعي @uraware2014 · 214,980 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
قناة | أبي جعفر عبدالله الخليفي @alkulife · 48,972 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 25 August 2026
تطبيق نقاهة @naqaha · 46,634 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026
دروس كاست @DroosCast · 92,290 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 August 2026
أناشيد أفراح _دف فقط @a3rasa3ras · 27,188 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 September 2026
قناة الشيخ د. عثمان الخميس ـ الرسمية @othmanalkamees · 80,233 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
بالوحي نُرَبِّي - سمر إبراهيم @Belwhynoraby · 63,188 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 47 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“في أقل من ثلاث” (@aqalmn3), 10,134 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aqalmn3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.