Channel
@omarluqman1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry
19,780subscribers
+979 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001424819020 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @omarluqman1 |
| Description | قناة تُعنى بالتربية والنفس والفكر والدعوة والإصلاح، منطلقةً من الوحي. أقوم عليها أنا (عمر لقمان)، مختص في المجال النفسي والتربوي والفكري. للتواصل من خلال رسائل القناة. |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/omarluqman1 |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 17:26 | 19,780 | +8 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 20:36 | 19,772 | -1 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 20:07 | 19,773 | +24 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 23:06 | 19,749 | +19 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 00:16 | 19,730 | -3 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 02:01 | 19,733 | +6 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 02:18 | 19,727 | +5 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 03:40 | 19,722 | +31 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 06:36 | 19,691 | +14 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 02:54 | 19,677 | +4 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 23:17 | 19,673 | +6 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 22:48 | 19,667 | +63 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 01:29 | 19,604 | +2 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 02:26 | 19,602 | +14 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 23:40 | 19,588 | +12 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 21:11 | 19,576 | +9 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 14:27 | 19,567 | +9 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 17:49 | 19,558 | -6 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 19:38 | 19,564 | -6 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 18:47 | 19,570 | first reading |
94 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 94 (28 July 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 85,454 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 16:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 15 of 27 posts held from the last 30 days (55.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
هذه الفترة تقدم لقاءات لطلاب البناء النفسي بعنوان: فقه الحياة: مهارات وملكات لا بد منها وهي دورة مقدَّمة للطلاب مجانًا. محاور هذه الدورة: • وقفة مع حديث (المؤمن القوي). • كيف تكتسب الملكات؟ وقفة مع حديث (إنما العلم بالتعلم). • ما الذي يمنعني من اكتساب الملكات وبناء ما أحتاجه للتعامل مع الحياة؟ وقفة مع الصوارف والمعوقات والموانع في (جهل). • النية: لماذا أريد اكتساب هذه المهارات والملكات؟ • التبصر والاستبصار: ما الذ…
بادر .. لقد فاتتك الغنائم .. رابط أصل المقطع. *حُذف من المقطع البيت الذي فيه التوسل بالنبي صلى الله عليه وسلم
على هذه السيرة لا أخفيكم لا أقتنع بالإجابات الجاهزة القصيرة المباشرة، ولا بالدورات القصيرة، ولا بالملخصات والمختصرات، ولا بالمقاطع القصيرة، ولا بعبارة: (أعطني الخلاصة في سطرين). خصوصا في هذا الواقع والزمن؛ فصورة المسألة الواحدة والإشكالية الواحدة معقدة متداخلة، تختلط فيها الشبهة بالشهوة، ويتداخل فيها العلمي بالنفسي بالاجتماعي، ويحمل كثير من النفوس إشكالات نفسية متعلقة بهذه الأسئلة، وقد تشكلت تصوراتهم عنها من مصادر…
لا تسأل سؤالًا لستَ مستعدًّا لتحمُّل تكلفة جوابه. سواء باتباع الحق أو في بذل بعض الجهد في الفهم. كمن يسأل عن جواب شبهة، فإن أحيل إلى مادة تجيب عنها = تكاسل عن مطالعتها. وكمن يسأل عن حكم معاملة ربوية في عمله أو بيته، فإذا جاءه الجواب بالتحريم ضاق صدره، وراح يتنقّل بين المفتين حتى يجد من يوافق هواه؛ فهو لم يسأل ليعمل، وإنما سأل ليطمئنّ على ما هو عليه. وكمن يسأل عن علاقة محرّمة، أو مالٍ أصابه بغير حق، وقد عزم في نفسه…
حين يصير المريض هو المعيار .. كما هو ظاهر في الخبر؛ ابتداءً من اليوم (6 نوفمبر 2026) صار حيازة ونشر أنواع معيّنة من مقاطع الفاحشة جريمة في إنجلترا وويلز، يعاقب عليها بالسجن حتى خمس سنوات، بموجب قانون الجريمة والشرطة لعام 2026. لاحظوا لم يمنعوا مشاهد الفاحشة، وإنما منعوا أقبحَ أطرافها، بعد أن صار القبيحُ عندهم مألوفًا، وصار الأقبحُ محتاجًا إلى قانون يردعه. وكأن هذه الانتكاسة الفطرية جاءت من فراغ!! ندرس في #برنامج_ت…
وقفة مع هذا الخبر 👇
Voice message, posted without a caption
🫂فقه التعامل مع الشهوة / التربية الجنسية / قصة سيدنا آدم / قصة سيدنا يوسف #تربية #أزكى_لهم #برنامج_تحرر #إدمان ⬇️⬇️
(حين تكبر ستعرف وتنضج) سمعناها كثيرًا ونحن صغار: (حين تكبر ستعرف)، (حين تكبر تتغيّر قناعاتك)، (حين تكبر ينضج فكرك)! وما كانت تُقال في الغالب حثًّا على أن نتّسع فهمًا ونزداد علمًا، بل تلميحًا إلى أن يقيننا الأول سذاجة، وأن حسمنا للأمور بسؤالٍ واحد: أيُرضي اللهَ هذا أم يُسخطه؟ = طور طفوليّ ستتجاوزه الأيام كما يتجاوز الصبيّ ثيابه. ثم كبرنا، فإذا الذي عرفناه حقًّا أن تلك النظرة (البريئة) كانت أقرب إلى الحق مما ظنّوا؛ …
﴿اهْدِنَا الصِّرَاطَ الْمُسْتَقِيمَ، صِرَاطَ الَّذِينَ أَنْعَمْتَ عَلَيْهِمْ﴾ / الفاتحة: 6-7 ﴿وَلْتَكُنْ مِنْكُمْ أُمَّةٌ يَدْعُونَ إِلَى الْخَيْرِ وَيَأْمُرُونَ بِالْمَعْرُوفِ وَيَنْهَوْنَ عَنِ الْمُنْكَرِ وَأُولَئِكَ هُمُ الْمُفْلِحُونَ﴾ / آل عمران: 104 ﴿أَفَمَنْ أَسَّسَ بُنْيَانَهُ عَلَى تَقْوَى مِنَ اللَّهِ وَرِضْوَانٍ خَيْرٌ أَمْ مَنْ أَسَّسَ بُنْيَانَهُ عَلَى شَفَا جُرُفٍ هَارٍ﴾ / التوبة: 109 ﴿قُلْ هَذِهِ سَ…
قناة بصيرة pinned a photo
. 📌الإعلان سيكون على هذه القناة إن شاء الله.
Showing the 12 most recent of 94 posts we hold for @omarluqman1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@omarluqman1 edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 5 posts on @omarluqman1 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة بصيرة” (@omarluqman1), 19,780 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/omarluqman1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.