#تشبيه_ الأخ الصالح :) متلقط الصورة : Ernest Porter / Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Channel
Creatures مَخلوقَاتٌ
@Creatures0
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
40,635subscribers
-206 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001285538937 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Creatures0 |
| Created | 17 December 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 43 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Creatures0 |
Topic
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Oct 2026, 21:10 | 40,635 | +8 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 00:20 | 40,627 | -4 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 21:56 | 40,631 | -8 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 19:31 | 40,639 | +18 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 16:30 | 40,621 | -17 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 08:09 | 40,638 | -18 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 01:58 | 40,656 | +19 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 18:20 | 40,637 | +46 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 19:40 | 40,591 | +83 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 13:00 | 40,508 | -19 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 11:59 | 40,527 | -19 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 21:37 | 40,546 | -15 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 07:42 | 40,561 | +3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 03:22 | 40,558 | -21 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 22:37 | 40,579 | -35 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 07:00 | 40,614 | -14 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:16 | 40,628 | -30 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:23 | 40,658 | -7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:42 | 40,665 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:09 | 40,671 | first reading |
Engagement
48 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 138 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 15.7%
- avg views ÷ 40,635 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 6,370
- 13 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 13
- of 48 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 48 (3 July 2026 – 18 October 2026) |
| Views total | 82,810 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Oct 2026, 17:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 21m 07s
- Average length
- 45s
Measured directly from 28 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
#مقالة 8 هذا الفيلم القصير اسمه "Becoming" (التكوّن)، ربح العديد من الجوائز وشاهده الكثير. أخذ معده 6 أشهر. فيلم لنمو حيوان السلمندر من خلية واحدة وانقسامها وتتابع المراحل حتى يصبح مخلوقاً مكتملاً #تصوير_متقطع #Timelapse مدة المقطع الحقيقية: حوالي أربعة أسابيع منذ شاهدته وهناك سؤال يلاحقني، كلما ضعفت وكلما وهنت سؤال في سورة الأنعام يحفر في ذهني وأسمعه كل يوم في أذني عند كل موقف أمر به "كيف أخاف؟" "كيف أخاف؟" "كيف أ…
Video, posted without a caption
سبحان الله، أحاول كتابة هذا المنشور منذ أكثر من 40 يوماً ولا أستطيع وأحذفه، كلما هممت لم يسعفني التعبير عمّا أريد قوله. #بوح_شخصي_ كنت أستمع لمحاضرة لأحد الأفاضل فرج الله كربته فشبه الدنيا بسباق او ماراثون، ولكنها سباق بحواجز وعقبات، فيجب أن نكون مستحضرين لهذا الأمر وصابرين مرابطين عند كل حاجز فالدنيا دار اختبار وفيها الفتن والمحن. وفي لحظة الاختبار قد تضعف عندك الرؤية كهذه الزرافات وسط العاصفة، فلا ترى بوضوح وتظنها…
Video, posted without a caption
#العائلة_ يحتاج الأمر بعض التدريب :) 3 أيام
﴿فَأَمَّا الزَّبَدُ فَيَذهَبُ جُفاءً وَأَمّا ما يَنفَعُ النّاسَ فَيَمكُثُ فِي الأَرضِ﴾ [الرعد: ١٧] شبَّه ما يكون في القلوب من الشهوات والشُّبهات عند وصول الحقِّ إليها بالزَّبد الذي يعلو الماءَ وأنها لا تزال فوق الماء طافيةً مكدِّرةً له حتى تذهب وتضمحلَّ، ويبقى ما ينفع الناس من الماء الصافي، كذلك الشبهاتُ والشَّهوات لا يزال القلب يكرهها ويجاهدها بالبراهين الصادقة والإرادات الجازمة حتى تذهب وتضمحلَّ ويبقى القلبُ خالصً…
ولو كانت خطواتٍ صغيرة :) ملتقط الصورة: Hannie Heere #باقي_5_أيام إن شاء الله
تذكير لنفسي, لأبقى على العهد وتذكير لمن أريد الخير له من إخواني مشروع خفيف جميل بدأت متابعته وسأحاول الاستمرار ما استطعت https://t.me/MajalesAlquraan
عامٌ جديد سأبدأهُ بنيةٍ صادقةٍ ومجهود صادق، أن أتعهدَ وأُحسنَ تعهّدَ القرآنِ في صدري، وِردًا وتدبّرًا. وأسألُ الله أن يجعلَه ربيعَ قلبي، ونورَ صدري، وجلاءَ همّي وحزني بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم ما زاحم القرآن شيئاً (إلا باركه)، و لا ضيقا ( إلاوَسعه )، و لا ظلمة ( إلا آنارها)، ولا وحدة( إلا آنسها ). ﴿ وَهَٰذَا كِتَابٌ أَنْزَلْنَاهُ مُبَارَكٌ فَاتَّبِعُوهُ وَاتَّقُوا لَعَلَّكُمْ تُرْحَمُونَ﴾ ﴿وإنه لكتاب عزيز﴾ فأعطه أعز…
أهم ما يميز مشروع د. نايف بن نهار وفقه الله هو رد المسلمين إلى مركزية القرآن في حياتهم كلها. وهو أهم ما يمكن أن يعمل عليه الدعاة المخلصون. الأخ صاحب لغة سلسة عميقة راقية وتنزيلات للآيات على الواقع بشكل يحبب كتاب الله تعالى إلى الناس ويعظمه في صدورهم. فنسأل الله تعالى أن يبارك في مسعاه ويسدده ويكتب لدعوته القبول ويحفظها من كيد الفجار. أنصح جدا بمشاهدة هذه المحاضرة النفيسة: "أقومية القرآن"، وأنصح ان يكون ذلك اليوم ا…
#تشبيه المؤمن بدون ورده من القرآن وهدايته سمكة ويوم بدون ماء! سمكة "البلّيكو" أو "اللوريكاريا" Pleco Fish. تستطيع البقاء لأكثر من 30 ساعة خارج الماء وعند تعريضها للماء كأنها تعود للحياة! وعند الجفاف؟ تدفن نفسها في الطين وتدخل في حالة سبات مؤقت بدون حركة، تُبطئ فيها تنفّسها حتى تعود المياه! يا ربّ اهدِ وارْوِ قلوبَنا بالقرآن، واجعله ربيع قلوبِنا. قال صلى الله عليه وسلم: "أكثروا الصلاة عليَّ يوم الجمعة وليلة ال…
Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @Creatures0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Creatures0 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 11 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 11 September 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
مقطع ذكاء صنعي؟
- نعم21%
- لا81%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 18 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@shortqisas · 316 postsتفكر
@tfakkar · 2,8785 posts🤍 لأجلِكَ يا بُنَي 🤍
@yabonay · 1,3213 posts˼غَيم˹
@Gasab_al_sokar · 6261 postمدونة مسلمة #اترك_أثر
@Modwanamoslema · 661 postٱكتوبر | 1999.
@Octuber9 · 4851 postفقه النفس / مكاني
@makanyworld · 187,0981 postقناة سَارَّة مُحسِن يُوسُف
@taaheel_shamel · 2501 postرسائل..
@ttangawi · 6,0081 postمُدَوَّنَة يُوسُف
@ysh_alsager · 3,2681 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@makanyworld · 187,098#1
@Ghaith_Al_Wahi · 57,521#2
@aqalmn3 · 10,174#3
@majdonaapp · 1,351#4
@Abullayth · 2,858#5
@MSA8H1 · 30,177#6
@Abonoaf88 · 1,308#7
@ahmad_e_b · 60,914#8
@zbrqn · 6,462#9
@Zaid_Blog · 754#10
@t_hssan · 35,372#11
@itsTheQuraan · 277,924#12
@alanshitaleama1 · 111,110#13
@abimhmdalhanbali · 2,908#14
@aerfanalruooh · 38,768#15
@ahmad_abdelmon3em · 145,464#16
@QusayAlosaily · 125,406#17
@maymanaplatform · 25,568#18
@HninolEman · 2,341#19
@Qataaada · 1,693#20
@dr_alyahya · 2,582#21
@notaf_wadihia · 5,482#22
@so_alobodi · 20,613#23
@swteat_k · 10,614#24
@amerbahjat · 32,768#25
@https3E · 11,751#26
@qhsmp · 1,946#27
@fayz_zhr · 15,314#28
@ig_abdullah · 3,980 (as read 9 September 2026)#29
@tabbrizichannel · 16,004#30
@emran_amer_9944 · 11,196#31
@tmp100 · 316#32
@wa_ontha · 18,433#33
@mohamedhaghbb · 742#34
@watad_5 · 3,501#35
@Kawtharaljumah · 21,508#36
@Gnadel_1 · 11,765#37
@ODAH_Z · 17,848#38
@IFaisal_Turki · 14,346#39
@abdulaziz_alshathri · 13,361#40
@muslimah995 · 7,095#41
@tawheedproject · 3,238#42
@TafakorToEman · 1,574#43
@wadah38 · 18,419#44
@nafs_abiia · 546#45
@Gaidae · 11,301#46
@osaaamaaahhh · 16,145#47
@Erth_n · 10,650#48
@HusseinAhmedChannel · 46,772#49
@alsayed_ah · 513,414#50
@EyadQunaibi · 224,350#51
@ihsan_alotibie · 3,938#52
@alkulife · 49,144#53
@JourneyOfaPsych · 21,900#54
@sawt_alsudan · 26,622#55
@baraagk · 52,239#56
@abdulwahab7m · 9,332#57
@helthAndWellness · 6,140#58
@manhajiyyat · 12,651#59
@hadithiah · 2,182#60
@cabsoulat · 499#61
@a_altememe · 10,281#62
@Dralderes · 36,529#63
@HusseinAhmed1983 · 99,134#64
@bilgasem · 25,293#65
@Ahmadhajry · 21,087#66
@etfhuko · 3,738#67
@firas_ah1 · 1,726#68
@khawatir_alsayed · 69,088#69
@abdullah_khateb · 6,977#70
@abu0hamza · 4,912#71
@Drnasief · 8,038#72
@RajaaAlOla · 1,259#73
@wezarahchannel · 7,241#74
@lllmmmlllllll · 22,596#75
@almoslih · 67,309#76
@sohba_fekhelnafs · 16,433#77
@fadelsi · 3,226#78
@hudhud_0 · 15,469#79
@latnshor · 6,458#80
@alfawayid99 · 35,326#81
@doros_alkulify · 18,243#82
@Nfayis · 7,725#83
@mogr7775 · 20,946#84
@athar_btaqat · 11,398#85
@aalwhebey · 26,719#86
@tsameemalshaye · 6,135#87
@eqtebasaati · 8,607#88
@alnatheerr · 32,559#89
@QuranPediaApp · 29,638#90
@alkhattabirw · 44,482#91
@swteat_alkulife · 8,118#92
@aldffar · 7,234#93
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@hatheehi_sabili_asmaa · 28,622
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Creatures مَخلوقَاتٌ” (@Creatures0), 40,635 subscribers as measured 18 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Creatures0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.