This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
11 measurements spanning 36 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,054–6,070 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Sept 2026, 09:02
6,065
-3
6 Sept 2026, 05:39
6,068
+3
2 Sept 2026, 01:25
6,065
+9
27 Aug 2026, 00:24
6,056
-2
23 Aug 2026, 15:36
6,058
+1
20 Aug 2026, 11:06
6,057
-1
17 Aug 2026, 19:33
6,058
-1
15 Aug 2026, 01:33
6,059
-6
9 Aug 2026, 05:03
6,065
-1
6 Aug 2026, 13:21
6,066
-2
6 Aug 2026, 04:16
6,068
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
136 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
89
65.4%
👍
40
29.4%
💔
4
2.94%
💯
3
2.21%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 143 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
قال صلى الله عليه وسلم :
" أَكثِروا عليَّ منَ الصَّلاةِ يومِ الجمعةِ وليلةِ الجمعةِ فإنَّ صلاتَكم معروضةٌ عليَّ". قالوا : كيفَ تعرضُ صلاتنا عليْكَ وقد أرَّمتَ يعني بليت . قالَ: " إنَّ اللَّهَ حرَّمَ على الأرضِ أن تأْكلَ أجسادَ الأنبياءِ"
ينبغي أن نقرأ هذا الحديث من باب الحياء، فكيف يدعونا صلى الله عليه وسلم للإكثار ونحن مقلين، وكيف يؤكد لنا أنه سيعلم بصلاتنا عليه ونحن غير مبالين، هذا مقام شريف فيه صلة بالنبي صلى ال…
الحمد لله على تيسيره، صدر بحث: نظرية كمال الشريعة - دراسة في المفهوم والاستدلال والاستثمار
A Theory of the Perfection of Sharīʿa (Naẓariyyat Kamāl al-Sharīʿa): A Study in Concept, Demonstration, and Investment
رابط البحث في المجلة:
https://aust.uni.ye/article/181/1483
تحميل البحث (PDF):
https://aust.uni.ye/magazine/sh/2026/13/181/d398e156bbda1b22e46958533dd91acd.pdf
[https://t.me/ttangawi/2056]
اللهم انفع به واغ…
الحمدلله على تيسيره، صدر البحث الثاني ضمن سلسلة أبحاث في نقد الأخلاقيات الطبية وتفعيل الشريعة في المجال الطبي: الأخلاقيات الطبية في الأدبيات الإسلامية المعاصرة - دراسة في الاتجاهات والمنهجيات
View of Medical Ethics in Contemporary Islamic Literature: A Study of Trends and Methodologies https://share.google/Lzc6mfBRpCgFzrQaq
https://t.me/ttangawi/2054
اللهم انفع به واغفر ما فيه من زلل
وصلى الله على نبينا محمد
يقول ابن القيم رحمه الله في زاد المعاد في أسباب شرح الصدر :
ومنها: العلم، فإنه يشرح الصدر، ويُوسِّعه حتى يكون أوسعَ من الدنيا، والجهل يُورِثُه الضِّيقَ والحَصَرَ والحَبْس، فكلَّما اتَّسعَ علم العبد انشرح صدره واتَّسعَ، وليس هذا لكلِّ علمٍ، بل للعلم الموروث عن الرسول - صلى الله عليه وسلم -، وهو العلم النافع، فأهلُه أشرحُ الناس صدورًا، وأوسعهم قلوبًا، وأحسنهم أخلاقًا، وأطيبهم عيشًا
انتهى.
وأظن أن من أسباب شرح الصدر…
هذا الهدوء النفسي وبعد النظر الذي يتغلب على العاطفة صعب جدا، وهو من جوانب العظمة الخلقية في النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم، والتي يصل من تأملها لزيادة اليقين بأنه نبي مهدي مسدد من ربه سبحانه
جاء في الحديث أن عبدُ اللهِ بنُ أُبَيٍّ قال: قد فعَلوها، واللَّهِ لَئِن رَجَعنا إلى المَدينةِ لَيُخرِجَنَّ الأعَزُّ منها الأذَلَّ. قال عُمَرُ: دَعني أضرِبُ عُنُقَ هذا المُنافِقِ، فقال صلى الله عليه وسلم :
دَعْه، لا يَتَحَدَّثُ النَّا…
يحضرنا اليوم واسطة عقد العشر، أضيقها مساحة وأثمنها قيمة..
الحمدلله الذي بلغناها إياه، وأرجوه أن يتقبله بقيول حسن.
وإنني لأميّز دعوات عرفة، وأعرف ملامحها وهي تُطلّ طوال العام والله أكرم وأكبر..
إنه يوم الدعاء، كما جاء عن الترمذي قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم:" خَيْرُ الدُّعَاءِ دُعَاءُ يَوْمِ عَرَفَةَ، وَخَيْرُ مَا قُلْتُ أَنَا وَالنَّبِيُّونَ مِنْ قَبْلِي : لَا إِلَهَ إِلَّا اللَّهُ وَحْدَهُ لَا شَرِيكَ لَهُ، لَ…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ttangawi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
تشويقات قرآنية @tashweeqatquran · 44,525 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
قناة جيل يقرأ @ReadTube · 29,004 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 9 September 2026
مكتبة النفس التواقة @baz_book · 45,706 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 27 August 2026
رواسخ @Rawasekh · 31,672 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 September 2026
قناة تسنيم راجح @TassneemRajehChannel · 41,909 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“رسائل..” (@ttangawi), 6,065 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ttangawi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.