Channel
@lara_khaleds
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,166subscribers
+222 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001418838189 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lara_khaleds |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lara_khaleds |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 21:16 | 6,166 | -1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:35 | 6,167 | +24 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 05:38 | 6,143 | +11 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 6,132 | +61 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:42 | 6,071 | +7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 6,064 | +2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 6,062 | +17 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:28 | 6,045 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 6,047 | +76 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:37 | 5,971 | +31 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:31 | 5,940 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:55 | 5,944 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 5,944 | first reading |
28 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 28 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
868 reactions across 28 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 746 | 85.9% | |
| 💘 | 35 | 4.03% | |
| 👍 | 34 | 3.92% | |
| 😢 | 26 | 3.00% | |
| 😭 | 14 | 1.61% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 0.922% | |
| 💔 | 5 | 0.576% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 868 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
"انظر أغيرَ الله يجبرُ كسرنا! وانظر أمثلَ الله من قد عوّضك؟ وتظنّ أنّ الخيرَ في ما تشتهي ولوِ ارتضى ما تشتهيهِ لأهلكك! وتظنّ أنّ الله ردّكَ .. إنّما هو حافظٌ من كلّ شرٍّ سلّمك! اللهُ أرحمُ منكَ فيكَ فثق بهِ وتُضيع نفسكَ إنّما ما ضيّعك! "🤍 #الثلث_الحبيب_من_الليل
❤15😢3💘2
العفة قيمة وهوية جمعية مسار للفتيات د. لارا خالد السبع اليوم: الأربعاء الوقت: ٧ونصف مساء التاريخ: ٢٩/ ٢/ ١٤٤٨ عبر الرابط التالي / https://us06web.zoom.us/j/88177325385?pwd=eSVlojBbUE02AXu0AVQF893F1Y3215.1
❤12💘2👍1😭1
كانَ النَّبيُّ ﷺ لا ينامُ علَى فِراشِه حتَّى يقرأ بَني إسرائيلَ -الإسراء- ، والزُّمَرِ. حديث صحيح
❤23
في العادة عندما أقرأ كتابًا أنهيهِ في جلسة واحدة، إلا أن بعض الكتب من جمالها أشعر أن ثمة معانٍ لا أستطيع المرور عليها سريعًا، فأقرؤها على مهل.. ومن تلك المعاني، ما قرأتُه في كتاب الطاهرات عن حادثة الشِّعب؛ حين اشتد أذى قريش على النبي ﷺ، وكتبوا صحيفةً تعاهدوا وتواثقوا فيها على بني هاشم وبني المطلب: ألا ينكحوا إليهم ولا ينكحوهم. ولا يبيعوهم شيئَا ولا يبتاعوا منهم. حصارٌ اجتماعي اقتصادي قاسٍ، استمر سنوات، حتى جُهد الم…
❤35😭7💘5👍3
مع التقدير للجميع أظن الوقت أصبح مناسبا لمناقشة بعض المسلمات المنتشرة في الوسط العلمي النفسي، من منظور ثقافي. هناك مسلمات متداولة وتدرس للطلاب في الطب النفسي وعلم النفس، منها: لا تخلط الدين بعلم النفس! أنت طبيب أو أخصائي نفسي ولست واعظا! لابد من الحياد القيمي مع المريض! نحن نقول ما يلي: هذه مسلمات ثقافية وليس بالضرورة علمية بحتة. هي مناسبة للمجتمع الذي نشأ فيه الطب النفسي المعاصر وعلم النفس المعاصر، وهي الم…
❤15👍7👏4
وإذا اللطيفُ أرادَ شيئًا قال " كُن " فيكونُ مهما الأمرُ بانَ مُحالا! 🩷
❤32
يا حامل الهمّ ... الله العظيم القدير.. يعطيك قبل أن تسأل.. ويعطيك وأنت تسأل.. ويعطيك دون أن تسأل .. #الثلث_الحبيب_من_الليل
❤38😢3👏1
(العالي يبقى عالي) أقرأ في كتاب (الطاهرات) في سير أمهات المؤمنين رضي الله عنهن.. وتوقفت عند ترجمة أمي خديجة رضي الله عنها متأملةً وصفها.. قال ابن إسحاق: كانت خديجة امرأة حازمة، شريفة، لبيبة، من أوسط نساء قريش نسبًا، وأعظمهن شرفًا، وأكثرهنّ مالًا، كلّ قومها كان حريصًا على ذلك منها لو يقدر عليه.. قال الإمام الذهبي: كانت عاقلة، جليلة، ديّنة، مصونة، كريمة.. قالت نفيسة بنت مُنْيَة - صديقة خديجة-: كانت خديجة بنت خويلد …
❤41👏3👍2
واهمِس لقلبكَ همسًا خفيفًا لا تخشَ شيئًا .. إنّ اللهَ معك 🤍 #الثلث_الحبيب_من_الليل
❤34💔2
File, posted without a caption
❤4
الحمدلله على تيسيره، صدر البحث الثاني ضمن سلسلة أبحاث في نقد الأخلاقيات الطبية وتفعيل الشريعة في المجال الطبي: الأخلاقيات الطبية في الأدبيات الإسلامية المعاصرة - دراسة في الاتجاهات والمنهجيات View of Medical Ethics in Contemporary Islamic Literature: A Study of Trends and Methodologies https://share.google/Lzc6mfBRpCgFzrQaq https://t.me/ttangawi/2054 اللهم انفع به واغفر ما فيه من زلل وصلى الله على نبينا محمد
❤6
سيجعلُ اللهُ بعد العُسرِ مَيْسَرةً ويجبرُ الروحَ بعد الحُزنِ واليأسِ حتّى تقولُ وقد طالَ الزمانُ لها شتان بين شعورِ اليومِ والأمسِ إنَّ البشائرَ في الآفاقِ دانيةٌ يومًا ستهطلُ بالأفراحِ والأُنسِ لا عُسرَ إلا ونورُ اليُسرِ يتبعهُ كالنورِ يولدُ من إشراقةِ الشمسِ وعدٌ من اللهِ في التنزيلِ أثبتَهُ فلتطمئني لوعدِ اللهِ يا نفسي🤍 إنَّ القلوبَ إذا ضاقت فإنَّ لها في سورةِ الشرحِ سلوانًا من البؤسِ #الثلث_الحبيب_من_الل…
❤39😭6😢5
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @lara_khaleds. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“|| د. لارا خالد ||🖋📚” (@lara_khaleds), 6,166 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lara_khaleds.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.