Channel
@zadaltareq
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
30,463subscribers
-482 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001004601146 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zadaltareq |
| Description | قناة تُعنى باقتباسات مميزة من دروس أ. أناهيد السميري، وبعض الدروس المفرغة، مع العلم أن هذه الدروس والاقتباسات لم تعرض على الأستاذة حفظها الله ، لكنها مراجعة ومدققة من أستاذات فاضلات. |
| Created | 8 October 2015 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 5 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zadaltareq |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 01:40 | 30,463 | -5 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 22:39 | 30,468 | -3 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 21:17 | 30,471 | -3 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 21:30 | 30,474 | +1 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 21:01 | 30,473 | +11 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 19:28 | 30,462 | +5 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 16:56 | 30,457 | -2 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 17:26 | 30,459 | -5 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 18:31 | 30,464 | -11 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 20:55 | 30,475 | -6 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 17:57 | 30,481 | -9 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 20:26 | 30,490 | -3 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 21:27 | 30,493 | -8 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 00:57 | 30,501 | -8 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 23:09 | 30,509 | -13 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 02:06 | 30,522 | -11 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 23:57 | 30,533 | -2 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 19:28 | 30,535 | -3 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:29 | 30,538 | -5 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 19:29 | 30,543 | first reading |
2,088 posts held, back to 8 October 2015 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 345 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 2,088 (8 October 2015 – 1 November 2026) |
| Views total | 14,600 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 23:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 4 posts held from the last 30 days (25.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
على ثغر واحد ثلاث رسائل من سورة الصف للعاملين في ميادين الدعوة ١. صدق الرسالة ﴿لِمَ تَقُولُونَ مَا لَا تَفْعَلُونَ﴾ [الصف: ٢] لا يكتمل أثر الدعوة بحسن البيان وحده، بل لا بد أن يشهد سلوك الداعية لصدق ما يدعو إليه؛ فاستقامة العمل من أعظم ما يعزز مصداقية الرسالة. ٢. تماسك الصف ﴿كَأَنَّهُمْ بُنْيَانٌ مَرْصُوصٌ﴾ [الصف: ٤] صورة قرآنية في سياق الجهاد، نستلهم منها قيمة التماسك والتناصر؛ فاختلاف الأدوار لا ينبغي أن يفرق ا…
﴿وَيُهَيِّئْ لَكُمْ مِنْ أَمْرِكُمْ مِرْفَقًا﴾ الكهف: ١٦. ﴿بِئْسَ الشَّرَابُ وَسَاءَتْ مُرْتَفَقًا﴾ الكهف: ٢٩. ﴿نِعْمَ الثَّوَابُ وَحَسُنَتْ مُرْتَفَقًا﴾ الكهف: ٣١ « مِرفقًا» ما ينتفع به الإنسان ويتيسّر به أمره، و«مُرتفقًا» موضع الاتكاء والاستقرار والراحة. ومن لطائف التدبّر: أن الفتية حين تركوا ديارهم فرارًا بدينهم، وثقوا أن الله سيهيّئ لهم في الكهف ما يرتفقون به؛ فليست الراحة بسعة المكان وحدها، وإنما بما ينشره ا…
قيام الليل الفردوس المعجل للمؤمن.
قال تعالى : ﴿وَنَفْسٍ وَمَا سَوَّاهَا ٧ فَأَلْهَمَهَا فُجُورَهَا وَتَقْوَاهَا ٨ قَدْ أَفْلَحَ مَن زَكَّاهَا ٩ وَقَدْ خَابَ مَن دَسَّاهَا ١٠﴾ [الشمس ٧-١٠] من تكريم الإنسان أن الله أقسم بالنفس الإنسانية، وجعل جواب القسم متعلقًا بتزكيتها. فالنفس كريمة في أصل خلقها، غير أن بقاءها على هذه الكرامة مرتبط بتزكيتها؛ فمن زكاها أفلح، ومن دساها خاب. وهذا يبين معنى قوله تعالى في سورة التين: {ثُمَّ رَدَدْنَاهُ أَسْفَلَ سَافِ…
🌿 سؤال وردني: كيف أُرضي قلبي بحقيقة الموت وأجعله يتقبلها؟ أنا ألزم الدعاء، لكن أشعر أن هناك شيئًا ناقصًا أحتاج أن أعرفه أو أسمعه؛ شيئًا يصحح عندي المفاهيم الوجودية المتعلقة بالموت والحياة. الجواب: نحتاج أولًا أن نبني تصورًا صحيحًا عن الموت نفسه. أحيانًا نخاف الموت لأن صورته في داخلنا هي: انقطاع، وفقد، ونهاية، وظلمة. بينما الوحي يعيد بناء هذه الصورة؛ فالموت انتقال من دار إلى دار، ولقاء بالله، وبداية للحياة التي ل…
🌟 جديد مدونة علمٌ ينتفع به فقه الدعوة فقه النفْس فقه المشاعر
الإيمان الذي ينجي الإنسان ويدخله الجنان، مصدره معرفة الرحمن
🍃﴿إِنّا أَخلَصناهُم بِخالِصَةٍ ذِكرَى الدّارِ﴾ ﴿ذِكۡرَى ٱلدَّارِ﴾ تُسبّب الاستقرار. ذكرى الدار الآخرة تجعل العبد في غاية من الاستقرار النفسي والفكري ما لا يُتصوَّر! مقتبس من دروس (حال السلف مع القرآن) https://t.me/zadaltareq/2618
🔺 كيف تتعبد الله باسمه الصمد؟ إذا علمت أنه هو وحده كامل الصفات، وأنه وحده مالك الملك، وأنه وحده القريب المجيب المطلع الذي يعلم خائنة الأعين وما تخفي الصدور، فاعلم أن عليك أن تفزع إليه في كل حال، وأن لا ترى غيره مفزعًا لك. إذا علمت أنه الجبار الذي كمل في جبروته؛ فاعلم أنه وحده الذي يجبر قلبك، أي: إذا وقع في قلبك ألم فلا يجبره إلا لجوءك إلى الله، تصمد إليه فيجبر قلبك. إذا وقع في رزقك نقص فاعلم أنه لا رزاق إلا هو …
🔺 من يبقى خائفا من النقص لن ينفع نفسه ولا أمته، ولن يحرك ساكنا.
🔺 أسماء الله وصفاته المذكورة لنا نحتاج أن نعرفها، وأن نعيش تحت ظلها لأنها مناسبة لما خلقنا عليه من طباع.
🔺يكفينا في معرفة أهمية الطباع أن جزءا كبيرا من اختبارنا هو في الطباع.
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,088 posts we hold for @zadaltareq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@zadaltareq named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 6 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“زاد الطريق” (@zadaltareq), 30,463 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zadaltareq.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.