رفعنا نسخة جديدة للتطبيق، في الاندرويد والآيفون. تحديثك للتطبيق سيظهر المميزات الجديدة.
❤75👍39🔥15💯9💔1

Channel
@algran1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
79,865subscribers
+1,645 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001378808718 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @algran1 |
| Description | جمعية تهدف إلى ضبط القرآن وإتقانه، بمراعاة وضوح الخطة وجودة الحفظ. رقم الترخيص: 1000813600 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/algran1 |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 22:36 | 79,865 | -20 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 01:28 | 79,885 | -40 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 04:18 | 79,925 | -23 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 03:58 | 79,948 | -16 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 06:09 | 79,964 | +12 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 08:00 | 79,952 | -7 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 10:16 | 79,959 | -14 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 12:40 | 79,973 | -27 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 13:55 | 80,000 | -44 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 16:00 | 80,044 | -27 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 13:16 | 80,071 | +11 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 14:26 | 80,060 | +6 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 17:41 | 80,054 | +38 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 20:59 | 80,016 | -7 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 15:51 | 80,023 | +78 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 09:44 | 79,945 | +94 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 08:30 | 79,851 | +598 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 09:48 | 79,253 | +730 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 10:38 | 78,523 | +562 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 08:15 | 77,961 | first reading |
49 posts held, back to 7 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 183 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 49 (7 April 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 403,170 |
| Reactions total | 7,393 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 07:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
10,743 reactions across 48 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6,102 | 56.8% | |
| 👍 | 2,888 | 26.9% | |
| 💔 | 887 | 8.26% | |
| 💯 | 452 | 4.21% | |
| 🔥 | 254 | 2.36% | |
| 👌 | 160 | 1.49% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,743 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 31 posts held from the last 30 days (22.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
رفعنا نسخة جديدة للتطبيق، في الاندرويد والآيفون. تحديثك للتطبيق سيظهر المميزات الجديدة.
❤75👍39🔥15💯9💔1
تعليقات في موضوع تسجيل الدخول لحساب الطالب والطالبة: ١. في الأيام الأخيرة، قام المبرمج بتطوير بعض خصائص التطبيق، وهذا تسبّب في تسجيل خروج تلقائي لجميع الحسابات. ٢. عند إعادة تسجيل الدخول في التطبيق، يظهر لبعض الحسابات جملة: (المرجو التأكد من صحة البيانات)، مع أن البيانات صحيحة. السبب: كانت تظهر لمن عنده مشكلة في الشبكة وقت الدخول، والمفترض ألا تظهر الجملة، وستحذف إن شاء الله ٣. وصلتنا رسائل كثيرة لاسترجاع كلمة الس…
❤120👍63💔6🔥6
في رواية ورش عن نافع من طريق الأزرق، أريد قراء يقرأون بقصر البدل، فالقراء الذين كتبتم سابقا يقرأون بالتوسط. في قصر البدل، استمع لهؤلاء القراء: - بلال عيناوي. - حمزة تكارلي. - ياسين الجزائري. ومن طريق الأصبهاني: - توفيق الخزاعي. - محمد عبد الكريم.
❤68👍30💔1
#أسئلة_الدورة_التأهيلية #موضوع_الاجتياز س١: كم يجب على الطلاب والطالبات أن يحفظوا في الدورة التأهيلية؟ ج: يجب الوصول إلى نسبة يومية لا تقل عن (٨٥٪). س٢: ماذا (٨٥)؟! لعلكم تقصدون (٧٥٪)؟ ج: لا، بل نريد خمسا وثمانين. أما خمس وسبعون، فهذا لمن دخل في الحلقات؛ لأن الحلقات زمنها طويل إلى الختم، فنخفف عليكم عند دخولها. أما الدورة التأهيلية، فهي اختبار لجديتكم في مدة قصيرة، فنريد تحقيق هذه النسبة (٨٥٪). س٣: أنا لا أعرف في …
❤119👍68💯12💔5
الحسابات جميعها تعمل، وحُلّت المشكلة ولله الحمد والمنّة.
❤146👍63💔41💯11👌6
هناك مشكلة عامّة تظهر لكثير من الطلاب والطالبات تمنعهم من الدخول لحساباتهم. ستُحل قريبا إن شاء الله
👍123❤49💔17💯14👌11🔥4
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم بدأت الدورة التأهيلية منذ هذه اللحظة (١:١٥ص). لقد ظهرت الخطة اليومية في حساباتكم، وسيبدأ احتساب التفريط من اليوم. وفق الله الجميع.
👍168❤118💔22🔥13💯9👌6
تأكيد للمرة ثانية: الدخول للحساب ضروري؛ لكي لا يستبعد. ومثله أيضا الدخول لرسائل الايميل الذي سجلت به (انظر خانة الوارد، وخانة غير المرغوب فيها)، حتى تقرأ تعليمات برنامج تكرار. تحقق من ايميلك؛ لكي لا يفوتك الالتحاق بالدفعة. 🛑 الملفات وغيرها قد تشتغل في الايميل، ولا تستجيب لك في التطبيق عند النقر عليها.
❤98👍69💔29👌5
تنبيه لطلاب وطالبات الدفعة الجديدة: لقد بدأنا وسترون تعليمات الدورة في حساباتكم. ولذلك نؤكد على أهمية الدخول للحساب ابتداءً من هذه الليلة حتى لا يستبعد.
👍163❤78💔20💯7🔥6👌3
يبدو أن عددا كثيرا ينتظر الجواب. الجواب: أن طريقة (جعل المراجعة على مراحل) التي تعتمدها بعض البرامج هي أكبر سبب لتفاوت الحفظ، ووجود سور حفظها متقن، وسور حفظها فيه ضعف، أو ضعيف. وحتى يتضح الأمر نضرب مثالا: لنفترض أن الحافظ سيبدأ نقطة الانطلاق من اليمين (أي: من البقرة وصولا إلى الناس). حينما كان محفوظه قليلا، يحفظ بضعة أجزاء فقط، كان يراجع سورة البقرة في يومين وثلاثة أيام فقط، ولذلك ستكون سورة البقرة متقنة جدا، فهو يق…
❤250👍74💯31🔥8👌3💔2
لماذا اعتمدتم في برنامج تكرار كون المراجعة في ستة أيام دائما، ولا تتغير بغض النظر عن كمية الحفظ؟ سأوضح سؤالي أكثر: هناك برامج تراعي كمية الحفظ، وتجعل الطالب ينتقل من مرحلة إلى مرحلة. -المرحلة الأولى: إذا كان مجموع الحفظ أقل من عشرة أجزاء فالمطلوب يوميا قراءة جزء واحد، فمن كان يحفظ ثلاثة أجزاء سيختم في ثلاثة أيام، ومن كان يحفظ خمسة أجزاء سيختم في خمسة أيام، وهكذا. - والمرحلة الثانية: إذا تجاوز مجموع الحفظ عشرة أجزاء …
👍455❤40💯8👌5💔2
إلى كلّ طالب وطالبة الْـتَحـقوا حديثا ببرنامج قرآني: هذه تجربة خاتمة في «برنامج تكرار» تخاطب فيها المستجدين، كتبتها بأحرف صادقة، وكلمات من القلب. "من أنا قبل تكرار، ومن أنا بعده" https://t.me/algran1/1137?single
❤89👍11🔥7💯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @algran1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@algran1 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“جمعية تكرار لحفظ القرآن وإتقانه” (@algran1), 79,865 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/algran1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.