Channel
@Alelm_waldawah
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,549subscribers
+80 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001171153088 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Alelm_waldawah |
| Created | 6 March 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Alelm_waldawah |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 07:18 | 8,549 | +2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 22:39 | 8,547 | -1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:19 | 8,548 | +12 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 09:40 | 8,536 | +19 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:40 | 8,517 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 8,520 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 8,521 | +19 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:14 | 8,502 | +8 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 8,494 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:56 | 8,499 | +10 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:23 | 8,489 | +6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 8,483 | +15 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:12 | 8,468 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:41 | 8,470 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 8,469 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 8,469 | first reading |
51 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 51 (25 July 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,682 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
[اختر موقعك والْزم ثغرك] يا طالب العلم، يا من علّمك الله ما لم تكن تعلم: إن كنت متحيرًا في كيفية تزكية علمك فها أنا أدلك على وسائل يسيرة نافعة، تبرأ بها الذمة، وتنصر بها الملّة، وتبلّغ بها الرسالة، فمن ذلك: أولا: تواصَل مع طلاب العلم والدعاة إلى الله الذين نفع الله بهم، واعرض عليهم مساعدتهم فيما هم فيه من الخير والعلم والدعوة إلى الله، فستجد عندهم بابًا ينتظرون موَفقًا مثلك يفتحه، ويكون في فتحه فتحُ خيرٍ عظيم، ونفع ك…
📝 |وجوب الالتزام بالأنظمة المرورية 🗓 15 / 3 / 1448 هـ 🎙 | أحمد بن ناصر الطيار 📻 | https://youtu.be/6oAu4zzAApA?si=4uhebnjyyO1-UqSM
تنْبيه وإعذار: من منهجي أني لا أردّ على أحد تكلّم عليّ، أو نسبني إلى جماعةٍ ضالة زورًا وبهتانا.. وإني قد حلّلت كل مسلم إلا من طعن في ديني, وحذّر الناس منّي, وكذَب عليّ, واتّهمني أنني أنتمي لأيّ جماعة, ولا أحلّل من نقَل كلام هؤلاء الطعّانين ونشَره أو صدّقه. وسأقف يومًا – إن شاء الله - خصمًا لهم أمام الله الجبار القهار, إلا من تاب وكفّ عن ذلك، وصرّح بخطئه في كلامه عنّي. وأنا بريء من كل انتماءات وجماعات, وليس لي انتماء …
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
آداب إرسال الرسائل الصوتية: مما استجدّ في هذا الزمان: إرسال رسالة صوتية عبر مواقع التواصل، ونحتاج إلى معرفة بعض الآداب المتعلقة بها، ومنها: أولا: البدء بالسلام، ثم التحية المناسبة لمن تُرسل له، فتحية الوالد ليست مثل تحية الصديق، وتحية الصغير ليست مثل تحية الكبير، وتحية العالم ليست مثل تحية غيره، فلكل مقام مقال. ثانيا: ألا تكون مسْتعجلا أو مشوشَ الفكر، بل ينبغي عليك الصبر حتى يصفو ذهنك، فقد ترسل رسالةً حال تشوش الفكر …
ترجمة الجواب باللغة الإندونيسية
سأل أحد الإخوة هذا السؤال فقال : شيخنا حفظكم الله، ماهي أفضل طريقة في ترتيب الطعام والنوم لطالب العلم من استيقاظه إلى نومه...؟! فأقول وبالله التوفيق : من أعظم أسباب علو الهمّة، والمحافظة على الصحة النفسية والبدنية، وصلاح القلب، وصفاء الذهن، الذي له الأثر الكبير على استقرار النفس، وزيادة الإيمان: العناية بالنوم والأكل. وسأذكر الطريقة الصحيحة في ذلك، وهي التي وفقني الله للسير عليها، وقد وجدت أنا وغيري الأثر الكبير في…
Photo, posted without a caption
من قلة مروءة بعض الناس وضعف عقله ودينه: نسيانه معروف صاحبه، وجمال أفعاله وطول عشرته بسبب ذنب وقع منه، أو زلة بدرت منه . "أيذهب يومٌ واحدٌ إن أسأته بصالح أيامي وحسن بلائيًا؟" ونفسك لا تخلو من عيوب وأخطاء، فكذلك الخلق كلهم. [ فن التعامل واكتساب الأخلاق، ص٣٧٧
تنطلق يوم الأحد أولىٰ أورادنا 📅، ولما كان البرنامج قرائيًّا لزم أن نتعلّم كيف نقرأ ونكتسب هذه العادة التي ميّزت العلماء عن غيرهم من الناس... 📚✨ ولهذا برفقة وردنا الأوّل لقاء مع شخص متميز عُني بالقراءة وشؤونها ، وهو الأستاذ الفاضل معاذ القنون بعنوان: "كيف تقرأ كتابًا" 📖 التوقيت: من الساعة ٤:٣٠ إلىٰ ٥:٣٠ عصرًا بتوقيت مكّة المكرّمة ⏰ الأحد ١٠ ربيع الأوّل ١٤٤٨ الموافق ٢٣ أغسطس ٢٠٢٦ كونوا علىٰ الموعد يا كِرام. 🤝
📝 | أتدري ما أفضلُ وأوسع ما أُعطيتَ؟ 🗓 8 / 3 / 1448 هـ 🎙 | أحمد بن ناصر الطيار 📻 | https://youtu.be/iHn7J79TK38?si=sOfHUzcULUOlB-MY
Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @Alelm_waldawah. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 49 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“العلم والدعوة أحمد بن ناصر الطيار” (@Alelm_waldawah), 8,549 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Alelm_waldawah.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.