مسائل فقهية في الخسوف. 👆

Channel
قناة عبدالرحمن السديس
@assdais
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
23,079subscribers
+507 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001006676129 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @assdais |
| Description | قناة علمية. عبدالرحمن بن صالح السديس الرياض. تويتر https://x.com/assdais?t=bamsawh__YRgDV1YxYVNdQ&s=35 يوتيوب https://youtube.com/@assdais?si=crAripvh6ZLH8bnv |
| Created | 7 November 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 21 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/assdais |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:59 | 23,079 | +7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 23,072 | +20 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 23,052 | +20 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 23,032 | +12 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 23,020 | +30 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 22,990 | +17 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 22,973 | +23 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 22,950 | +18 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 22,932 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 22,931 | +21 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 22,910 | +37 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 22,873 | +58 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 22,815 | +24 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:42 | 22,791 | +21 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:31 | 22,770 | +36 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 22,734 | +46 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:26 | 22,688 | +59 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:07 | 22,629 | +40 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:00 | 22,589 | +17 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 22,572 | first reading |
Engagement
58 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 14.7%
- avg views ÷ 23,079 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,400
- 49 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 49
- of 58 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 58 (25 July 2026 – 27 August 2026) |
| Views total | 166,423 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 09:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 864
- Videos
- 207
- Links
- 139
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 3h 39m
- Average length
- 8m 07s
Measured directly from 27 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
لقاح الشر وعقبى الحلم!
لم أجد الكتاب كما مدحوه!
Photo, posted without a caption
هل البدع أشد من المعاصي بإطلاق؟ وهل المبتدع أشد من العاصي بإطلاق؟ وقد دخل الخلل على بعضهم من عدم فهم كلام الأئمة، الذي كان في بدع اعتقادية كبرى، فحمله هؤلاء على بدع عملية صغرى، ثم جعلوها أكبر من الكبائر! والحجة: البدعة شر من المعصية، والمبتدع شر من العاصي! ودخل على بعض طلبة العلم الصُحفيين خلل قبيح من اعتمادهم على إطلاقات للعلماء لم يفهموها ووضعوها في غير مواضعها.
هل يشرع الدعاء بعد التشهد الأول؟
من أدب الفتيا قال ابن وهب حدثني مالك بن أنس عن عبدالله بن يزيد بن هرمز أنه كان يُسأل عن الشيء، فيقول: «إن في هذا نظرًا وتفكرًا. فيقال: أجل فافعل. فيقول: [إن له] شغلا وتفكرا، وما أحب أن أشغل نفسي في ذلك، متى أصلي؟! متى أذكر؟!». «الجامع» (١٤٣٨). ❁ فـ (لا أدري) تغلق هذا الباب، وتفتح عليك باب الإقبال على ما ينفعك. ❁ وليت مَن يتكلف السؤال عن غيره يلزمها، قل: لا أدري؛ فهو خير لك وأسلم من السؤال له ثم إجابته؛ وكأنك المجي…
من معاني (لا أدري) قال الأثرم: «سمعت أبا عبدالله أحمد بن حنبل يُستفتى؛ فيكثر أن يقول: لا أدري، وذلك فيما قد عَرف الأقاويل فيه. وذلك أنه يُسأل عن اختياره، فيذكر الاختلاف. ومعنى قوله (لا أدري) أي: لا أدري ما أختار من ذلك. وربما سمعته يقول في المسألة: لا أدري، ثم يذكر فيها أقاويل». «الفقيه والمتفقه» ص٧٢٤. وكثير من مسائل الخلاف هذا شأنها، لا يكون لك فيها رأي جازم، وإن كنت قد تميل لرأي، وقد تعمل به. لكن المستفتي ينتظر …
سماع الصوفية ورقصهم! {اتخذوا دينهم لهوا ولعبا} قال ابن القيم: «ولو لم يكن فيه من المفاسد إلا ثقل استماع القرآن على قلوب أهله، واستطالته إذا قرئ بين يدي سماعهم، ومرورهم على آياته صما وعميانا، لم يحصل لهم منه ذوق ولا وجد ولا حلاوة، بل ولا يصغي أكثر الحاضرين أو كثير منهم إليه، ولا يعرفون معانيه، ولا يغضون أصواتهم عند تلاوته. فإذا جاء السماع الشيطاني؛ خشعت منهم الأصوات، وهدأت الحركات، ودارت عليهم كؤوس الطرب والوجد، و…
لماذا يحبس عنك العطاء؟ #إيمان #حكمة #قدر
يا أهل النخيل تصدقوا فعن جابر بن عبد الله أن النبي ﷺ أمر من كُلِّ جَادِّ عَشْرَةِ أَوْسُقٍ من التمر بِقِنْوٍ يُعَلَّقُ في المسجد للمساكين». رواه أحمد وأبو داود، وصححه ابن خزيمة وابن حبان. و١٠ أوسق= ٦٠٠ صاع، وهي تساوي -تقريبا- (١٣٠٠-١٥٠٠) كيلو جرام. وهذا (القنو= العذق) الذي أمر النبي ﷺ بوضعه في المسجد عند جداد النخل عن هذا المقدار؛ هو صدقة غير الزكاة المفروضة في التمر.
وهذا مثال أيضا https://x.com/hafezalfaleh/status/2090156888247697904
Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @assdais. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@assdais edited 6 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 9 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 25 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 8,235 of 1,623,166entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@Al_eilm · 17,4033 postsد. عبدالله بن بلقاسم
@bilgasem · 24,9353 postsالكُنَّاش في الفَوائد
@jimm213 · 2,0443 postsقناة الدعاء المستجاب
@adoo3aelmostadjab · 5932 postsقناة عبدالمجيد الحربي
@Amalharbi_90 · 1,4302 postsفوائد الديوانين
@arrewayahalthkafh · 8,7422 postsقناة الفوائد والفرائد العلمية
@fwaed1447 · 8,9442 postsقيدُ الصَّيد ومُلاعَبته
@mohammeddorgam · 1572 postsقناة أحيمد
@Aheimd19 · 1,8441 postالثُلّة
@althala_A · 1861 postاقوال السلف والخلف
@aqwall_alsalaf · 2831 postبراء (مَـوَاجِـیۡـد)
@baraa97 · 1,5481 postقناة فقهية
@dr_alghfaily · 7,9781 postديجـور.
@forawhil · 71 postحيّ بن يقظان
@haybenyaqzan · 781 postكناش الفوائد والخواطر
@kanash_al · 5201 postأوابـد
@m21S2 · 161 postقناة || معاوية بن إحسان العتيبي
@M_Otaibe · 2,4941 postMassoud Vahedi
@mavahedi · 3401 postمنقاش | العلم وسُبله
@mengash4 · 1361 postناشِئُ الفِتيانِ🔻
@merely_Trustworthy_adviser · 551 postقَنَاة | مُهَنَّد
@mohanndjazich · 2,7371 postفوائد
@MohmedYahiaFawed · 1,2811 postنُورٌ مُــــتَبَلِّج|📖
@Muballaj · 351 postإِتْحَافُ الأَرِيبْ || أَبُو عِكْرِمَة
@mustakeen · 13,1071 postالاستعداد لرمضان
@Ramadan12123 · 1011 postغَيَاهِبُ الكَلِم.🔻
@revo7A · 3041 postعَبَقُ الذِّكْرِ 🌿
@sanaa2013 · 4,0611 postشَذَراتْ
@shatharat31 · 7331 postمُسهّد ..
@tathweerat · 3411 postثمرات شتّى
@thamratt · 1551 postالرواق التيمي
@timih61 · 1,1091 postخواطر شاب
@Waeloo2 · 25,3041 postيونس بن عبد الله السلامة
@y1439 · 3,8891 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@dorarnet_telegram · 108,598
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 August 2026
@Algoayme · 44,140
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
@abntaymia3 · 51,169
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 25 August 2026
@El_minshawy · 109,112
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
@ahmedsalem81 · 60,721
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026
@ktbibnalqaim · 87,168
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
@alosyme · 60,837
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026
@abdulazizatarefe · 59,092
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 August 2026
@drasatolya · 73,157
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
@ayman0789459028 · 114,095
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 August 2026
@mshmsh89 · 51,161
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 25 August 2026
@axxxxa140 · 69,584
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 August 2026
@ahmad_abdelmon3em · 144,969
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
@saudinews50 · 166,910
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
@faharisalkutub · 48,974
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 August 2026
@koutobi · 74,677
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 August 2026
@Ghaith_Al_Wahi · 57,069
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 23 August 2026
@HusseinAhmed1983 · 100,007
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 August 2026
@TamayyuzCenter · 114,242
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 August 2026
@a3malkamila · 86,852
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 18 August 2026
@algran1 · 78,092
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 August 2026
@FighBooks · 44,593
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 August 2026
@HaithamHuwayni · 65,102
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 August 2026
@tdabur1 · 71,967
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 53 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة عبدالرحمن السديس” (@assdais), 23,079 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/assdais.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.