Channel
@assdais
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
23,753subscribers
+1,181 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001006676129 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @assdais |
| Description | قناة علمية. عبدالرحمن بن صالح السديس الرياض. تويتر https://x.com/assdais?t=bamsawh__YRgDV1YxYVNdQ&s=35 يوتيوب https://youtube.com/@assdais?si=crAripvh6ZLH8bnv |
| Created | 7 November 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 37 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/assdais |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 01:22 | 23,753 | +61 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 09:15 | 23,692 | +62 |
| 2 Oct 2026, 14:39 | 23,630 | +243 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 15:18 | 23,387 | +47 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 04:02 | 23,340 | +29 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 07:40 | 23,311 | +24 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 15:17 | 23,287 | +66 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 12:59 | 23,221 | +31 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 23,190 | +28 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 18:58 | 23,162 | +18 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:05 | 23,144 | +22 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:56 | 23,122 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:27 | 23,123 | +3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:42 | 23,120 | +15 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 23,105 | +13 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 23,092 | +13 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:59 | 23,079 | +7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 23,072 | +20 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 23,052 | +20 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 23,032 | first reading |
107 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 91 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 107 (25 July 2026 – 12 October 2026) |
| Views total | 119,301 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Oct 2026, 04:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 39 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
التوبة قال شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية: «ومن تدبر أصول الشرع علم أنه يتلطف بالناس في التوبة بكل طريق». «تفسير آيات أشكلت» ٥٩٥/٢. ذكره في كلامه على آيات الربا، وهو فصل في هذا الكتاب من ٢/ ٥٧٤-٧٠٣. والكتاب حقق في رسالة ماجستير، ونوقشت عام ١٤١٥هـ، وطبع عام ١٤٢٤هـ. وقد طبع هذا الفصل أيضا في «جامع المسائل» ٨/ ٢٧١-٣٣٠، وهذا المجلد طبع عام ١٤٣٢هـ بتحقيق الشيخ محمد عزير شمس رحمه الله، ولم يذكر أنه سبق نشره، والظاهر أنه لم يعلم …
تأليف لطيف: إكمال الإعلام بتثليث الكلام.
هل يجيب المؤذن نفسه؟
. قال ابن تيمية: «ولا ريب أن لذة العلم أعظم اللذات. واللذة التي تبقى بعد الموت وتنفع في الآخرة؛ هي لذة العلم بالله، والعمل له، وهو الإيمان به.. وأعظم لذات الآخرة لذة النظر إلى الله سبحانه، كما في الحديث الصحيح: «فما أعطاهم شيئا أحب إليهم من النظر إليه»، وهو ثمرة معرفته وعبادته في الدنيا. فأطيب ما في الدنيا معرفته، وأطيب ما في الآخرة النظر إليه سبحانه». «مجموع الفتاوى» ١٦٢/١٤-١٦٣.
Photo, posted without a caption
النهي عن الحلف بغير الله عز وجل
. حوار في حكم لبث الحائض في المسجد. من أرشيف مشاركاتي في «ملتقى أهل الحديث». كنت أتصفح ما جُمع، فقلت لعل هذا مناسب للنشر، فنظرت في تاريخ أول مشاركة؛ فإذا هو نفس تاريخ اليوم، ١٠/٦ قبل عشرين عاما (بالميلادي)! وليست عشيات الحِمى برواجع .. إليك، ولكن خَلِّ عينيك تدمعا!
وقال ابن تيمية -بعد كلام حسن في آيات التحدي-: «وكون القرآن آية معجزة ليس هو من جهة فصاحته وبلاغته فقط، أو نظمه وأسلوبه فقط، ولا من جهة إخباره بالغيب فقط، ولا من جهة صرف الدواعي عن معارضته فقط، ولا من جهة سلب قدرتهم على معارضته فقط، بل هو آية بينة معجزة من وجوه متعددة: من جهة اللفظ، ومن جهة النظم، ومن جهة البلاغة في دلالة اللفظ على المعنى، ومن جهة معانيه التي أمر بها، ومعانيه التي أخبر بها عن الله تعالى، وأسمائه وصفا…
نبه الإمام ابن تيمية في على قضية مهمة، هي: اقتصار بعضهم في قضية «إعجاز القرآن» على لفظه وأسلوبه، وإغفال الجانب الأعظم للإعجاز وهو ما فيه من المعاني الجليلة.. فقال: «ولهذا ذمَّ العلماء الراسخون والمؤمنون الصادقون مَن اقتصر في إعجاز القرآن على ما فيه من الإعجاز من جهة لفظه أو تأليفه أو أسلوبه. وقالوا: هذا وإن كان معجزًا؛ فنسبته إلى ما في معانيه من الإعجاز نسبة الجسد إلى الروح، ومحاسن الخَلْق إلى محاسنِ الخُلُق. وهو…
سوء الظن وحسنه!
«الحمدلله، اكتمل جمع وترتيب كل ما في القناة وما وجد من ملتقى أهل الحديث، وقد جاوز مجموع ما في الملتقى والقناة الأربعة آلاف صفحة، ومجموع القناة جاوز الألفين ومئتي صفحة بحمدالله. وقد كنت -أدام الله فضلك- في زمن طويل أتتبع ما كتبتم ونشرتم من العلم، أقلب فيه النظر وأتمّلى بما فيه من صنوف العلم والحكم، وأحتفي به، وأُعرّف به من أرجو فيه سدادًا وخيرًا ثم جمعت أول ما جمعت مما كان مكتوبًا في فن أصول الفقه لنفسي، أُقرِّب فيه…
المتفرقات. من قناة عبدالرحمن السديس pdg.
Showing the 12 most recent of 107 posts we hold for @assdais. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@assdais edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 175 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة عبدالرحمن السديس” (@assdais), 23,753 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/assdais.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.