Video, posted without a caption

Channel
شذا المحابر
@abo_hoorl
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,681subscribers
+61 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001417348963 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @abo_hoorl |
| Created | 31 March 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 56 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/abo_hoorl |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 06:09 | 13,681 | -1 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 03:34 | 13,682 | -1 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 02:19 | 13,683 | -5 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 03:59 | 13,688 | +8 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 00:50 | 13,680 | -6 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 02:56 | 13,686 | +1 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 05:57 | 13,685 | -4 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 04:58 | 13,689 | -3 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 06:46 | 13,692 | -3 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 09:37 | 13,695 | -6 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 06:00 | 13,701 | -1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 04:08 | 13,702 | -3 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 05:06 | 13,705 | +1 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 01:29 | 13,704 | -4 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 01:48 | 13,708 | -3 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 00:46 | 13,711 | -7 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 19:57 | 13,718 | -7 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 16:41 | 13,725 | -8 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 15:57 | 13,733 | +1 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 14:10 | 13,732 | first reading |
Engagement
169 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.50%
- avg views ÷ 13,681 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 889
- 37 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 44
- of 169 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 169 (29 July 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 32,901 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 18:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈4,850
- Videos
- ≈1,010
- Links
- ≈3,340
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 49m 57s
- Average length
- 1m 34s
Measured directly from 32 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 44 posts held from the last 30 days (4.55%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
وفاءُ المرء أدلُّ شيءٍ على كريم معدنه، وطيب أصله، وشرف نفسه، وأرفعُ درجات الوفاء الوفاءُ عند انقطاع أسباب الوصل التامّ. ذكر ابن حزم في طوق الحمامة ثلاث مراتب للوفاء، جعل أعلاها: «ثم مرتبة ثالثة، وهي الوفاء مع اليأس الباتّ، وبعد حلول المنايا وفجاءات المنون، وإنَّ الوفاء في هذه الحالة لأجلُّ وأحسنُ منه في الحياة ومع رجاء اللقاء». ومن جميل ما يُروى في الوفاء وحُسن العهد، قول أم المؤمنين عائشة رضي الله عنها: «جاءت عج…
﴿إِنَّا فَتَحۡنَا لَكَ فَتۡحࣰا مُّبِینࣰا﴾ قال ابن عباس: كنت أقرؤها، فلا أدري ما هي، حتى تزوجتُ بنت مسرج، فقالت: فتح الله بيني وبينك. تقول: قضى الله بيني وبينك. فهذا ابن عباس حبر الأمة خفي عليه معناها وهو ترجمان القرآن. فهذا يدلك على أن خفاء بعض العلم لا يعني التوقف فلا يشترط في قراءة العلوم أن تفهم كل جملة ومسألة يكفي أن تخرج بـ ٦٠ أو ٧٠ بالمئة فما خفي سنجد حل مشكله في قابل الأيام. ولا تنقطع عن كتاب لأجل مسألة أو …
قال الأصمعي: رأيت بدوية من أحسن الناس وجها لها زوج قبيح، فقلت: يا هذه أترضين أن تكوني تحت هذا؟ فقالت: يا هذا لعله أحسن فيما بينه وبين ربه فجعلني ثوابه، وأسأت فيما بيني وبين ربي فجعله عقوبتي، أفلا أرضى بما رضي الله؟! ربيع الأبرار للزمخشري
File, posted without a caption
Signed .
Live stream finished (40 minutes)
بدأنا صفحة 27 من متن كتاب التوحيد
Signed .
File, posted without a caption
Signed .
Live stream started
بإذن الله تعالى سنشرع بعد الفجر في تمام الساعة ٦:١٠ص في شرح كتاب التوحيد باب من تبرك بشجرةٍ أو حجر ونحوهما. نسأل الله الإعانة والتوفيق والسداد، آمين.
Signed .
الدرس اليوم بعد المغرب إن شاء الله
File, posted without a caption
Signed .
Showing the 12 most recent of 169 posts we hold for @abo_hoorl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@sha_x01 · 12 postsخَدِيــجَة.
@Kh1714_1417 · 311 postجَنيُّ الثَمَر
@Qotoof09 · 4121 postهَمَسَاتٌ وَرُؤَىٰ
@alalmaei1998 · 2761 postالأمل 🌿
@alaml23 · 41 post📚إعلانات الدورات الدينية📚
@course_announcements · 10,7951 postقناة : الدورات العلمية 📑
@droos_k · 6681 postمكتبة المكتبات
@maktbatalmaktabat · 4821 postمحراب القراءة
@me1hrab · 3881 postمتفرقات📚
@motafareqat · 11 post「أبُو البَرَاءِ الكِنَانِيُّ」
@shams_elddin · 6141 postقناة طلال الحسّان.
@t_hssan · 35,6681 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@sha_x01 · 12 postsهَمَسَاتٌ وَرُؤَىٰ
@alalmaei1998 · 2761 postالأمل 🌿
@alaml23 · 41 postغيث
@Gaitt12 · 351 postقناة الرقية الشرعية _خالد الحربي
@kale_b_b146 · 1,3681 postخَدِيــجَة.
@Kh1714_1417 · 311 postقناة أعظم أفكار الأمهات
@Niceideas2 · 3,3711 postجَنيُّ الثَمَر
@Qotoof09 · 4121 postرحلة إلى السماء السابعة
@Roro12345889 · 1,4221 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@eqtipasat · 22,756
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 17 September 2026
@Alrahmn · 80,355
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 18 August 2026
@shffaaaaa · 25,017
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 30 September 2026
@axxxxa140 · 67,304
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 August 2026
@k_therebel · 39,280
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 September 2026
@bilgasem · 25,391
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 September 2026
@yasser_alhozimey · 44,035
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 August 2026
@ybh_100 · 94,143
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 August 2026
@Abd3llhhh · 30,636
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 September 2026
@ammalysr · 70,271
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 August 2026
@fawzeyah · 48,111
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 August 2026
@Ruqyah011 · 24,270
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 September 2026
@Ali_Hawwa · 27,057
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 11 September 2026
@zad_100 · 31,594
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 5 September 2026
@almeethaq · 22,637
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 September 2026
@assdais · 24,052
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
@Thirty_s30 · 27,793
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 September 2026
@Rafed111 · 92,950
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 August 2026
@i_Sarab4 · 21,609
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 September 2026
@t_hssan · 35,668
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 3 September 2026
@em3sarah · 19,022
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 October 2026
@kfayef · 35,048
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 2 September 2026
@hayaalsabah · 21,499
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 September 2026
@Dr_1awan · 21,538
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 September 2026
This channel appears in 40 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شذا المحابر” (@abo_hoorl), 13,681 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/abo_hoorl.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.