Channel
@nitharAlaikhtiar
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
16,058subscribers
+437 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001517760621 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nitharAlaikhtiar |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nitharAlaikhtiar |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 16,058 | +8 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 22:17 | 16,050 | +14 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 21:18 | 16,036 | +8 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:18 | 16,028 | +28 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 04:36 | 16,000 | +105 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 04:59 | 15,895 | +10 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 00:42 | 15,885 | -2 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:06 | 15,887 | +9 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:45 | 15,878 | +14 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:57 | 15,864 | +25 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:42 | 15,839 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 15,840 | +8 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 15,832 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 15,835 | +5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:28 | 15,830 | +25 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 15,805 | +18 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 15,787 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 15,791 | +9 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 15,782 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 15,780 | first reading |
77 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 77 (26 July 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 29,350 |
| Reactions total | 592 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,104 reactions across 73 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,234 | 72.0% | |
| 👍 | 412 | 13.3% | |
| 💔 | 127 | 4.09% | |
| 😭 | 122 | 3.93% | |
| 💯 | 94 | 3.03% | |
| 🥰 | 44 | 1.42% | |
| 👌 | 38 | 1.22% | |
| ❤🔥 | 28 | 0.902% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 0.161% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 77 of the 77 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,368 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 77 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
في شرح حديث "مَثَلُ الْمُؤْمِنِ كَالْخَامَةِ مِنْ الزَّرْعِ تُفَيِّئُهَا الرِّيحُ مَرَّةً وَتَعْدِلُهَا مَرَّةً وَمَثَلُ الْمُنَافِقِ كَالأَرْزَةِ لَا تَزَالُ حَتَّى يَكُونَ انْجِعَافُهَا مَرَّةً وَاحِدَةً" نقل ابن حجر رحمه الله كلامًا عن المهلب رحمه الله، وجاء فيه: "وَالْكَافِرُ لَا يَتَفَقَّدُه اللَّهَ بِاخْتِبارِهِ، بَلْ يَحْصُلُ لَهُ التَّيْسِيرُ فِي الدُّنْيَا لِيَتَعَسَّرَ عَلَيْهِ الْحَالُ فِي الْمَعَادِ، حَت…
❤30😭3
"عِلَاجَ الْأَمْرَاضِ كُلَّهَا بِالدُّعَاءِ وَالِالْتِجَاءِ إِلَى اللَّهِ أَنْجَعُ وَأَنْفَعُ مِنَ الْعِلَاجِ بِالْعَقَاقِيرِ" فتح الباري، لابن حجر ١٠ / ٢٤١
❤29👍8💔3
كثير يربطون بين البلاء وسخط الله؛ فيظنون أنّ الله ابتلاهم لسخطه عليهم؛ ويتساءلون سرًا أو علنًا: لمَ ابتلاني الله، وأنا ملتزم بأوامره مجتنب لنواهيه؟ ثم يقتلهم التفكير في أنفسهم وحياتهم وذنوبهم.. ثم يقارنون حالهم بحال من لم يصب ببلاء وهم أفضل منه.. ولو تمهلوا قليلًا وتفكروا في الشريعة لعلموا أنّ البلاء ليس بالضرورة عقوبة وسخطًا؛ خاصة عندما يصاب به المسلم؛ فقد يكون دفعًا لمكروه أو جلبًا لمحبوب أو كفارة لذنب أو رفعة في ا…
❤20💔4💯4🥰3👍1
(وَالْقَلِيلُ مِنْ الْحَلَالِ يُبَارَكُ فِيهِ، وَالْحَرَامُ الْكَثِيرُ يَذْهَبُ وَيَمْحَقُهُ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى) ابن تيمية رحمه الله، مجموع الفتاوى ٢٨ / ٦٤٦.
❤29❤🔥4
سَهِرَت أَعيِنٌ وَنامَت عُيونُ في أُمورٍ تَكونُ أَو لا تَكونُ إِنَّ رَبّاً كَفاكَ بِالأَمسِ ماكا نَ سَيَكفيكَ في غَدٍ ما يَكونُ
❤36👍5💯3😭1
يقول الصنعاني رحمه الله: "وانظرْ في حكمةِ اللهِ ومحبَّتِه لاجتماعِ القلوب كيفَ حرَّمَ النميمةَ وهيَ صدقٌ لما فيها منْ إفسادِ القلوب، وتوليدِ العداوةِ، والوَحشةِ، وأباحَ الكذبَ وإنْ كانَ حرامًا إذا كانَ لجمعِ القلوبَ، وجلبِ المودةِ، وإذهابِ العداوةِ". سبل السلام (٨ / ٢٦٤).
❤57👍2
(وَقَالَ إِنِّي ذَاهِبٌ إِلَىٰ رَبِّي سَيَهْدِينِ ) هناك ارتباط بين الذهاب إلى الله والهداية.. فكلما ذهبت إليه هداك في أمور دينك ودنياك.. https://t.me/nitharAlaikhtiar
❤54
إن احترت أي الدروب تسلك فقل: إِنِّي ذَاهِبٌ إِلَى رَبِّي سَيَهْدِينِ فإنه أتى بعدها قريبًا فَبَشَّرْنَاهُ https://t.me/nitharAlaikhtiar
❤39👍8
(وَعَسَىٰ أَن تَكْرَهُوا شَيْئًا وَهُوَ خَيْرٌ لَّكُمْ ۖ وَعَسَىٰ أَن تُحِبُّوا شَيْئًا وَهُوَ شَرٌّ لَّكُمْ ۗ وَاللَّهُ يَعْلَمُ وَأَنتُمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَ) لمّا تحدّث الله عن الخير والشر الذي يصيب الإنسان، وحبه لما يظنه خيرًا، وهو شر، وحبه لما يظنه شرًا وهو خير.. ختم الآية بخاتمة عظيمة تجعل المؤمن يقف عندها.. فقال: والله يعلم وأنتم لا تعلمون.. فعندما يوقن الإنسان بعدم علمه فإنه يسكت ولا يقترح ويكل الأمر لمن يعلم، و…
❤41💯4
أبو عبدالله القرشي كان يوصي أصحابه بقوله: "سيروا إلى الله تعالى عرجا ومكاسير؛ فإن انتظار الصحة بطالة". وفيات الأعيان، لابن خلكان (٤ / ٣٠٦).
❤50👍4💯3
يَا أَيُّهَا الْمُزَّمِّلُ قُمِ اللَّيْلَ ... إِنَّا سَنُلْقِي عَلَيْكَ قَوْلًا ثَقِيلًا... إذا ثقلت عليك الحياة، فقيام الليل يعينك على حملها.. https://t.me/nitharAlaikhtiar
❤58
تشكو وعندك السَّحَر؟! جاء في كتاب التوكل للقاضي أبي يعلى الفرّاء: "قال موسى بن عيسى الموصلي: ركبني دينٌ، فأتيت بشرًا، فقلت: قد ركبني دينٌ. قال: عليك بجوف الليل. ومضيت إلى أبي عبد الله أحمد بن حنبل؟ فقلت: ركبني دينٌ. قال: عليك بالسَّحَرِ". https://t.me/nitharAlaikhtiar
❤40😭14💯4
Showing the 12 most recent of 77 posts we hold for @nitharAlaikhtiar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 37 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 60 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة أ. د. مرضي بن مشوح العنزي” (@nitharAlaikhtiar), 16,058 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nitharAlaikhtiar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.